With the intent to defraud— (1) draws, prints, processes, produces, publishes, or otherwise makes, or attempts or causes the same, within the United States; (2) passes, utters

Download 17.71 Kb.
Size17.71 Kb.
Point 010 B. Affiant has no record or evidence that Affiant is guilty of creating fictitious obligations, but that Affiant does not admit that fictitious obligations do exist, to the hurt and injury of Affiant, as made more explicit in EXHIBIT 010 B - NOTICE OF FICTITIOUS OBLIGATIONS.

ADMIT - Libellees listed in this document admit to the truth and guilt of administering, processing, and promoting the use of fictitious obligations, created by fictional corporations, and enforced by fictional, legal entities and de facto governments.


TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 25, § 514. Fictitious obligations

Release date: 2005-08-03

(a) Whoever, with the intent to defraud

(1) draws, prints, processes, produces, publishes, or otherwise makes, or attempts or causes the same, within the United States;

(2) passes, utters [SEE Points 103, 104], presents, offers, brokers, issues, sells, or attempts or causes the same, or with like intent possesses, within the United States; or

(3) utilizes interstate or foreign commerce, including the use of the mails or wire, radio, or other electronic communication, to transmit, transport, ship, move, transfer, or attempts or causes the same, to, from, or through the United States,

any false or fictitious instrument, document, or other item appearing, representing, purporting, or contriving through scheme or artifice, to be an actual security or other financial instrument issued under the authority of the United States, a foreign government, a State or other political subdivision of the United States, or an organization, shall be guilty of a class B felony.

(b) For purposes of this section, any term used in this section that is defined in section 513 (c) has the same meaning given such term in section 513 (c).

(c) The United States Secret Service, in addition to any other agency having such authority, shall have authority to investigate offenses under this section.


The UNITED STATES CODE (USC) applies to all corporations of THE UNITED STATES, including ANYBANK USA, etc. Therefore, 18 USC Section 8 entitled "CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - CRIMES - Obligation or other security of the United States defined" specifically states:

"The term "obligation or other security of the United States" includes all bonds, certificates of indebtedness, national bank currency, Federal Reserve notes, federal Reserve bank notes, coupons..."

The "Dictionary of Banking" by Jerry M. Rosenberg defines the following terms:

obligation - the legal responsibility and duty of the debtor (the obligor) to pay a debt when due, and the legal right of the creditor (the obligee) to enforce payment in the event of default (page 246).

note - an instrument, such as a promissory note, which is the recognized legal evidence of a debt (page 243).
This implies that Federal Reserve Notes are simply "evidence of debt", "liability instruments", "negative money" and legal obligations of THE UNITED STATES.
In the case "Lewis v. U.S., 680 F.2d 1238 at 1241", the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK is established to be a private corporation which is engaged in commercial activity by law of merchants.
The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (presumably referred to in 18 USC Section 8 as the "creditor") is a private corporation in the business of "lending" private script "money" (akin to DISNEY CORPORATION'S "Disney Dollars") to THE UNITED STATES (presumably referred to in 18 USC Section 8 as the "debtor") by the authority of "The Federal Reserve Act of 1913".
Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code sets forth the requisite form of negotiable instruments. In short, UCC, Section 3-104 entitled "NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT" states: "Any writing to be a negotiable instrument within this article must: (a) be signed by the maker or drawer; and ; (b) contain an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in money and no other promise, order, obligation or power given by the maker or drawer except as authorized by this Article; and (c) be payable on demand or at a definite time; and (d) be payable to order or to bearer."
Therefore, "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES" violate your own laws and therefore do NOT meet the requirements of a note as required by Article 3 and in fact and law is NOT a "note", thereby making it an impossibility to "pay" the alleged debt "at law" using FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES. Since the sum of two negative numbers can never be zero, the account(s) can never be settled and closed. It further follows that Federal Reserve Notes are not payments. (See Don E. Williams Co. v. Comm. Int. Rev., 51 L. Ed. 2d 48 (1977)).
It stands to reason that if THE UNITED STATES is the debtor to FEDERAL RESERVE BANK and the "money" being used is actually "evidence of debt" then the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES must be bankrupt and currently operating in a state of chapter 11 bankruptcy. It is rational to conclude that ALL corporations in the U.S. are sub-corporations of THE UNITED STATES and are also operating in bankruptcy. Thus ANYBANK USA [replace with your info], etc., also must be operating in bankruptcy. If ANYBANK USA is bankrupt then how can ANYBANK USA "lend" credit to anybody since bankrupt corporations have no credit to lend? What "money of value" or asset instrument do any of the UNITED STATES corporations have to lend, including ANYBANK USA?
If Federal Reserve Notes are bankruptcy money or liability instruments, then how can ANYBANK USA, a FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM member, declare them to be "income" to YOUR CAP NAME HERE on the Form 1099C "Cancellation of Debt" (OMB No. 1514-1424) submitted to the Internal Revenue Service? It appears that all ANYBANK USA did was lend YOUR CAP NAME HERE debt.
Was there INTENT TO DEFRAUD BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS, THE COMMERCIAL BANKS, OR THE UNITED STATES? Affiant has no record or evidence that there was not!!
Affiant has no record or evidence that Libellees/Plaintiffs are not accusing Affiant of the very CRIME THAT THEY, THEMSELVES, COMMIT ROUTINELY, DAY BY DAY!

If a contract or agreement is void for fraud or voidable for fraud, and the opposing party ignores (does not respond to/rebut) one's affidavit of rescindment for fraud, a dishonor has occurred (UCC 3-505) for nonacceptance of refusal for cause (of unconscionable instrument UCC 2-302).

UCC 1-103.6 mandates all parties to construe the statute in harmony with the common law, within statutorily created legislative agency, forcing recognition of common law rights.

Download 17.71 Kb.

Share with your friends:

The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2022
send message

    Main page