What problem did Russia face after the1905 Revolution? How effective was Nicholas II in dealing with these problems?



Download 24 Kb.
Date19.03.2021
Size24 Kb.



What problem did Russia face after the1905 Revolution? How effective was Nicholas II in dealing with these problems? (S6A Yip Ka Yan)

In January 1905, there was a revolutionary tide in Russia. We called this revolution as 1905 Revolution mainly caused by the defeat of Russo-Japanese War in September and the Bloody Sunday Incident in January. In the country, workers, peasants and merchants were holding demonstrations in order to express their discontent to the Czarist government. Although Nicholas II issued the October Manifesto to pacify the discontent of people temporarily, he still had to face some problems after the 1905 Revolution. To regain the support from people, he needed to carry out the reforms in the October Manifesto. His reform included different aspect, such as political aspect, social aspect and economic aspect. He also appointed Peter Stolypin as the prime minister to stabilize the country. Nicholas II had tried his best to regain people’s support and stop the revolution tide through the reforms after the 1905 Revolution.

Poor livelihood, no franchise of general Russians and the insult of Russo-Japanese War all these were reasons to cause the 1905 Revolution. The Bloody Sunday Incident was an immediately cause to lead the outbreak of 1905 Revolution. After the 1905 Revolution, the Czar still had to face the above problems. IN order to prolong his rule, he was forced to reform Russia. At first, he agreed to set up parliament, Duma. It made Russia became a constitution country like Britain. Between the periods from 1906 to 1917, there were four Dumas in Russia. However, people were still discontent with the government. It’s because the Czar was not sincere in sharing power with people. The Car had dissolved the First and Second Duma because the elected representatives were liberators and opposed him. Moreover, the Czar only gave the upper-middle classes and workers had right to vote, but not everyone. This showed the insincerity of the Czar in political reform. This annoyed the Russians, especially the educated class. Therefore, the revolutionary tide had not died down in the post 1905 period. The discontent of people did not reduce and the political right of general Russians did not improve, it marked the ineffective of Czar’s political reform.

In social aspect, people had to pay a huge land payment, it added to the burden of people. Czar Nicholas II agreed to abolish the land payment to peasant. He also lent loan to farmers and gave subsides to farmers in order to lead them improve farm method by using machine instead of cow and man. This succeeded to create a class of Kulaks, rich people. The land reform had created a rich class at first, and then it would improve the general Russians. This land reform was a long-term scheme to improve the livelihood of general Russians, although it couldn’t their life right now. As a result, the land reform still succeeded in long-term period. To win people over to the side of the government, the Czar allowed Stolypin to build schools to provide Russians with elementary education. He also introduced free education with the aim to achieve compulsory free education. This education reform was successful to increase the rate of literacy of Russians. In other word, the education reform had regained the support from people and reduced the discontent. However, the Czar still ignored the problems about workers. He didn’t do anything to improve their working conditions. The workers still faced the problem of long working hour, low wages, poor working conditions and child labour. The discontent of workers did not reduce, even had a great increase when compared with the situation before 1905 Revolution. In social reform, we could not say it was successful at all, but succeeded in partly in education and land reform. It failed in improving the working conditions of workers.



In economic aspect, Nicholas II encouraged the industrial development, especially in coal and steel. He also encouraged railway developments to improve transport. The production of iron and coal increased greatly and the volume of trade grew. Moreover, Russia borrowed large fund from her allies, France and Belgium. This gave a great help in developing industry in Russia. As a result, Russia had a great improvement in industrial development. It also succeeded to reduce the discontent of people and improved the livelihood. The revolutionary tide even seemed to be died down. Therefore, the industrial reform in Russia was effective.

Although the Czar had adopted reforms, it could not reduce the discontent of Russians at all. Russians still felt discontented with the Czar, especially the intellectuals. Intellectuals felt discontent with the Czar because they thought the Czar was an unrepresentative nature of the government. Moreover, they had no right to vote in Duma. The general people had no voice in Duma, except the nobles and rich people. The peasants were also discontent with the Czarist government. The peasant still cultivated with a small piece of plot, their livelihood didn’t have much improve. The workers also had no improvement about their poor working condition. The discontent of those Russians had not reduced by Czar’s reforms. On the other hand, The Czar had achieved the aims in some reforms, such as education reform, industrial reform and land reform. However, when compared with the whole national reform, these reforms only represented partly success. The discontent of people had not reduced so much, even nearly remain unchanged or increased. In conclusion, Nicholas II was not effective in dealing with problems after 1905 Revolution.


Share with your friends:




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page