United states district court northern district of alabama



Download 2.48 Mb.
Page1/33
Date03.05.2016
Size2.48 Mb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   33

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Southern Division
In re: SILICONE GEL BREAST ) Master File CV 92-P-10000-S

IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY )

LITIGATION (MDL-926) ) (Applies to cases listed in Appendix)

ORDER No. 44A

(Show Cause Why Listed Cases Should Not Be Dismissed or Administratively Closed)
1. Thousands of cases are still pending in this court which, because of settlements, bankruptcy, summary judgment, or other reasons, are essentially dormant and could be dismissed or administratively closed. Elimination of such cases from the active docket will enable this court (and potential remand courts), parties, and counsel to focus their energies on the "active" cases.

(a) As a first step in this process, the undersigned on April 6, 1998, entered a "show cause" order (Order No. 44) listing in an appendix several thousand cases that had been transferred to this court under § 1407 prior to 1997 in which, according to the records maintained by the undersigned, no request for remand (to federal or state court) was pending and there were no special motions, etc., indicating that the case was active. Plaintiffs (or their counsel) were directed to indicate by July 17, 1998, which of these cases had "active" claims, i.e., claims that could and would be pursued without need to obtain leave of a bankruptcy court.

(b) As was indicated, the court then, based on those responses, published on its webpage (in August 1998) a revised listing of cases still potentially subject to dismissal or administrative closing under the terms specified in Order 44, and indicated that corrections to this listing could be informally suggested by September 18, 1998.

(c) The court has reviewed the various responses to the initial show cause order of Order 44, the further responses submitted during the period for informal responses, and changes in parties as a result of voluntary dismissals during this several month period, and, based on that review, determined which cases still appear to be appropriately potentially subject to dismissal or administrative closing under the terms of Order 44.

2. With this background, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(a) All parties (whether acting pro se or through counsel) are directed to indicate in writing to this court by October 23, 1998, filed with the Clerk, which of the cases listed in the appendix to this order should not be dismissed/administratively closed under the conditions of this order. The court does not request and does not want "negative" responses (i.e., an indication that a party does not object to dismissal/closing under the conditions of this order).

(b) Absent a timely and satisfactory response, these cases will be dismissed and/or administratively closed under the following conditions:

(1) Any pending claims against Dow Corning Corp. and Dow Corning Wright in these cases will be severed and administratively closed in this court without prejudice to the pursuit of such claims in the United States District and Bankruptcy Courts for the Eastern District of Michigan in accordance with procedures established in those courts and without impairing in any way the potential rights of such plaintiffs under any plan of reorganization (such persons to be treated under such a plan as if they still had a pending lawsuit against Dow Corning or Dow Corning Wright). This court will, moreover, retain jurisdiction to vacate such closings and reopen such claims against Dow Corning on written motion if filed within 30 days after reorganization proceedings of Dow Corning are dismissed or within 30 days after the Eastern District of Michigan determines that reopening of such cases against Dow Corning is the procedure to be followed in liquidating such claims.

(2) Any pending claims against The Dow Chemical Company or Dow Holdings, Inc. have been severed and transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Counsel should informally notify this court if, through oversight, it has failed to advise the Eastern District of Michigan of some claim against those defendants.

(3) Any pending claims against McGhan Medical Corp., INAMED Corp., CUI Corp., and their subsidiaries and principals will be severed and administratively closed, without prejudice to the pursuit of such claims in a pending class settlement of such claims (and with the same rights under any such settlement as if they still had a pending lawsuit against such companies and individuals). Moreover, this court will retain jurisdiction to vacate such closings and reopen such claims on request if that pending class settlement should not be approved.

(4) The plaintiff(s) in such cases will have the right to vacate the dismissal and reinstate in this court any previously pending claims against any of the other defendants by written motion filed in this court within 1 year after the date of the order dismissing the case. Unless and until vacated, the dismissal will be considered as with prejudice to the extent of precluding breast implant claims by the plaintiff (individually or as a class member) against such defendants in other cases in federal or state courts (except to the extent permitted under the terms of the Revised Settlement Program should a participating defendant default in meeting its financial obligations under that settlement).

(5) Each party will bear its own costs.

(c) Parties who object to dismissal/closing of a listed case under the above conditions should in their written responses indicate (1) the short caption of the case with its ALN case number and the transferor court and case number; (2) the defendant(s) named in the lawsuit against whom the plaintiff has an active claim to be pursued; and (3) the plaintiff's name (with her social security number if she wants to proceed against Bristol, Baxter, 3M, or Union Carbide). If a law firm is objecting to dismissal/closing in more than one case, the court prefers a single response that provides this information in an appendix to the response (rather than by separate filings in each such case).

DO NOT FURNISH THE CLERK WITH AN EXTRA COPY OF A RESPONSE AND DO NOT PROVIDE THE JUDGE WITH A "COURTESY" COPY OF A RESPONSE; THESE ARE ANYTHING BUT A "COURTESY" AND FREQUENTLY RESULT IN REDUNDANT CHECKS OF RECORDS.

The court has noted that some objections to dismissal have occurred because parties were named (initially or through an amendment) as defendants that were never reported to this court by the transferor court (or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation). Where counsel have reason to believe that this may be the reason for a case still showing as potentially subject to dismissal/closing (as by comparing the list of pending defendants shown on the appendix to Order 44 with the list of companies/persons named as defendants in the pleadings), they are encouraged to send an extract of the pleadings in which such companies/persons are shown in the caption as defendants; there is no reason, however, to send a copy of the entire complaint in such circumstances..

3. A copy of this order and the appendix will be filed and docketed in CV 92-P-10000-S and will also be placed on the court's Webpage for viewing, printing, and downloading. After expiration of the time for response and after considering the responses, the court will prepare a separate order listing the cases being dismissed/closed and reflecting the conditions of such dismissals/closing. A docket entry will then be made in each of the cases so dismissed or closed.

This the 21st day of September, 1998.
/s/ Sam C. Pointer, Jr.

Chief Judge

Serve: Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel

Defendants’ Liaison Counsel


Post also on

Appendix to Order 44A
AK 3:92-00639 CV92-11150 CORY_ERN JACOBS v. DOW CORNING

AK 3:93-00447 CV94-10278 TOMBERLIN v. DOW CORNING

AK 3:94-00054 CV94-11559 DEYOUN_M DEYOUNG v. DOW CORNING

AK 3:94-00142 CV94-12373 JEFFER_J HAMMACK v. DOW CORNING

AK 3:94-00471 CV95-10105 PETER_LA ROSENBERG v. DEPALATIS

AK 4:95-00025 CV96-10313 HENSLE_D PAMELA CULBREATH v. DOW CORNING

ALM 1:92-00391 CV92-10085 HORNSB_E TRAVIS v. DOW CORNING

ALM 1:92-00751 CV92-10349 SMITH_RU APPLEGATE v. MENTOR

ALM 1:93-00464 CV93-11440 DOWLIN_L BRACKIN v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE

ALM 1:93-00574 CV93-11581 ALLEN_J. BECK v. SURGITEK

ALM 2:91-01517 CV92-10086 REA_JAME ELEBASH v. DOW CHEMICAL

ALM 2:91-01535 CV92-10087 CORY_ERN PURDY v. SURGITEK

ALM 2:92-00506 CV92-10088 HENIG_JO HENIG v. DOW CORNING

ALM 2:92-00724 CV92-10671 ALLEN_J. VICKERS v. DOW CORNING

ALM 2:92-00725 CV92-10409 BEASL_JE MOOK v. DOW CORNING

ALM 2:92-00726 CV92-10410 HOBBS_TR JOHNSON v. DOW CORNING

ALM 2:92-01178 CV92-11286 HOBBS_TR LAWTON v. SUKRGITEK

ALM 2:92-01337 CV92-11151 ALLEN_J. ADAIR v. DOW CORNING

ALM 2:93-00127 CV93-10706 ALLEN_J. TOLER v. DOW CHEMICAL

ALM 2:93-00181 CV93-10831 ALLEN_J. WILLIAMS v. DOW CHEMICAL

ALM 2:93-00495 CV93-11582 HORNSB_E BOWMAN v. MENTOR

ALM 2:93-00558 CV93-11583 ALLEN_J. PEEK v. DOW CHEMICAL

ALM 2:93-00568 CV93-11584 ALLEN_J. LEAVITT v. SURGITEK

ALM 2:93-00571 CV93-11585 ALLEN_J. THRASHER v. DOW CHEMICAL

ALM 2:93-00572 CV93-11586 ALLEN_J. HUGHES v. SURGITEK

ALM 2:93-00573 CV93-11587 ALLEN_J. LEZOS v. SURGITEK

ALM 2:93-00826 CV93-12597 ALLEN_J. WILLIAMS v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ALM 2:94-00874 CV94-13725 LOWERY_P BELLURY v. DOW CORNING

ALM 3:93-00128 CV93-10707 ALLEN_J. KNOWLES v. DOW CHEMICAL

ALS 1:93-00037 CV93-11169 CARR_DAV SCROGGINS v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE

ALS 1:93-00377 CV93-11733 CARR_DAV LIVINGSTON v. DOW CORNING

ALS 1:93-00613 CV93-13206 GILL_WIL MCKENNA v. INAMED

ALS 1:93-00781 CV94-10685 CARR_DAV WEBSTER v. BRISTOL-MYERS

ALS 1:93-00783 CV94-10687 TIPTON_H ABBEY v. CORNING

ALS 1:93-00784 CV94-10688 CARR_DAV BARNES v. CORNING

ALS 1:94-00015 CV94-12682 MCCRARY v. MEC

ALS 1:94-00047 CV94-11350 GILL_WIL TILLMAN v. DOW CORNING

ALS 1:94-00079 CV94-13726 ATCHIS_J MANNING v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

ALS 1:94-00145 CV94-13727 ZOGHBY_A BROOKS v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ALS 1:94-00381 CV94-13728 BEDSOL_B ROOT v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE

ALS 1:96-01072 CV96-12522 CRUMP_RI TAYLOR v. MEC

ALS 2:94-00058 CV94-11351 GILL_WIL FELKER V DOW CORNING v. ALS

ARE 1:93-00012 CV93-11315 ADCOCK_L DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 1:94-00011 CV94-12374 GRIDER_M MAHAFFEY v. AESTHETECH

ARE 2:92-00114 CV92-11152 HUTTON_M DAVIS v. AESTHETECH

ARE 3:92-00068 CV92-10090 HENRY_JO BALSER v. DOW CORNING

ARE 3:92-00253 CV92-11038 BRIDEW_R DOYLE v. BAXTER HEALTH

ARE 3:94-00087 CV94-12127 BRIDEW_R CLAY v. DOW CORNING

ARE 3:94-00294 CV94-14266 GRIDER_M WATSON v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:92-00391 CV92-10350 LEE_T_M_ JONES v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:92-00427 CV92-10411 HEALY_FL GLENN v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:92-00591 CV92-11153 KITTER_G MATTHEWS v. MEC

ARE 4:92-00689 CV92-11154 CROCKE_M ODOM v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00071 CV93-10708 BAKER_DA O'NEAL v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00086 CV93-10709 BAKER_DA HARRIS v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00127 CV93-11002 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00128 CV93-11003 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00129 CV93-11004 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00130 CV93-11005 HICKS_CH DOE v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

ARE 4:93-00131 CV93-11006 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00132 CV93-11007 HICKS_CH DOE v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ARE 4:93-00133 CV93-11008 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00134 CV93-11009 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00135 CV93-11010 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00136 CV93-11011 HICKS_CH DOE v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

ARE 4:93-00137 CV93-11012 HICKS_CH DOE v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ARE 4:93-00138 CV93-11013 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00139 CV93-11014 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00140 CV93-11015 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00279 CV93-11589 BAKER_DA HARMON v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00281 CV93-11591 BAKER_DA FREEMAN v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00282 CV93-11592 BAKER_DA GRADY v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00283 CV93-11593 BAKER_DA COOPER v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE

ARE 4:93-00284 CV93-11594 BAKER_DA JONES v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00314 CV93-11734 BAKER_DA BECHTEL v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00473 CV93-12598 BAKER_DA DEROSSITT v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00534 CV93-12936 BAKER_DA WILKES v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00651 CV94-10001 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00652 CV94-10002 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00653 CV93-14135 HICKS_CH DOE v. CUI

ARE 4:93-00654 CV93-14136 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00656 CV93-13430 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00657 CV93-13431 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00658 CV93-13432 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00659 CV93-13433 HICKS_CH DOE v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

ARE 4:93-00660 CV93-13434 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00661 CV93-13435 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00662 CV93-13436 HICKS_CH DOE v. BRISTOL-MYERS

ARE 4:93-00663 CV93-13437 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00664 CV93-13438 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00665 CV93-13439 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00667 CV93-13441 HICKS_CH DOE v. AESTHETECH

ARE 4:93-00725 CV93-13934 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00726 CV94-11147 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00727 CV94-11148 HICKS_CH DOE v. MEC

ARE 4:93-00737 CV93-13935 HICKS_CH DOE #21 v. BRISTOL-MYERS

ARE 4:93-00738 CV93-13936 HICKS_CH DOE #24 v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00741 CV93-13938 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00751 CV93-14138 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00752 CV93-14139 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00753 CV93-14140 HICKS_CH DOE v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

ARE 4:93-00754 CV93-14141 HICKS_CH DOE v. CUI

ARE 4:93-00755 CV93-14142 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00769 CV93-14143 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00770 CV93-14144 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00771 CV93-14145 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00772 CV93-14146 HICKS_CH DOE v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00777 CV94-10689 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:93-00780 CV93-14147 LEE_T_M_ ASHLEY v. MEC

ARE 4:93-00781 CV93-14148 LEE_T_M_ WHATLEY v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00782 CV93-14149 BAKER_DA CLARK v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00916 CV94-10607 HEALY_FL THOMAS v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:93-00917 CV94-10608 HEALY_FL KORDSMEIER v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:94-00039 CV94-10690 BRIDEW_R VON FRICK v. MEC

ARE 4:94-00119 CV94-11738 HODGE_DA VANDEGRIFT v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:94-00186 CV94-12377 HODGE_DA TAYLOR v. SURGITEK/MEC

ARE 4:94-00187 CV94-12378 HODGE_DA HERRIN v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:94-00202 CV94-12683 BARRON_T CREECH v. CORNING

ARE 4:94-00236 CV94-12967 RICHAR_G SNYDER v. DOW CORNING

ARE 4:94-00306 CV94-13304 DABBS_WI HALBERT v. MEC

ARE 4:94-00447 CV94-13909 HICKS_CH DOE v. CORNING

ARE 4:95-00410 CV95-13130 BOSWEL_T HOLMES v. DOW CORNING

ARW 1:93-01048 CV93-11441 LIGHTF_J TURNER v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE

ARW 1:93-01068 CV93-12599 GRIGGS_R MCWILLIAMS v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ARW 1:93-01117 CV93-13939 BRIDEW_R BEASLEY v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE

ARW 1:94-01026 CV94-13560 DRAPER_G BURCHELL v. DOW CORNING

ARW 1:94-01048 CV94-13561 GRIGGS_R WRIGHT v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHLUTE

ARW 1:94-01049 CV94-13911 GRIGGS_R RABB v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ARW 1:94-01050 CV94-13562 GRIGGS_R SNEED v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ARW 1:94-01051 CV94-13563 GRIGGS_R YATES v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ARW 1:95-01023 CV96-12485 DRAPER_G JOHNSON v. DOW CORNING

ARW 1:95-01038 CV95-19107 DRAPER_G COLEMAN v. MEC

ARW 2:93-02002 CV93-10323 HUTTON_M KARSTENS v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ARW 2:93-02054 CV93-11442 HUTTON_M PEARCY v. AESTHETECH

ARW 4:93-04132 CV94-10280 MILES_WI FOSTER v. MEC

ARW 5:92-05178 CV93-10506 BRIDEW_R FULLERTON v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

ARW 5:92-05183 CV93-10507 BRIDEW_R ADRIAN v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

ARW 5:93-05033 CV93-11596 BRIDEW_R KRUG v. CUI

ARW 6:93-06009 CV93-10508 MILES_WI SPAINHOUR v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

ARW 6:94-06027 CV94-12379 HODGE_DA BEGGS v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-00499 CV93-10162 BRANDE_R DOE v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE

AZ 2:92-00592 CV92-10093 DECKER_R DOWNS v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-00593 CV92-10094 SCOTT_MI MCCANN v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-00966 CV92-10673 SCOTT_MI DEFAZIO v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

AZ 2:92-01000 CV92-10416 MORRIS_J B. LASSEN v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-01145 CV92-10417 SCOTT_MI R. ANGUILAR v. MEC

AZ 2:92-01299 CV92-10418 LEAL_JOS SHARON LUGO v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-01300 CV92-10419 LESSEL_F C. HUMAN v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-01302 CV92-10421 LESSEL_F C. SHRUM v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-01975 CV93-10001 FORSHE_T ARGUELLO v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-01976 CV93-10002 FORSHE_T WICKER v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-01977 CV93-10003 FORSHE_T ZIEGLER v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-02079 CV93-10004 CYPERT_N CYPERT v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

AZ 2:92-02101 CV93-10005 MARKS_ST POST v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

AZ 2:92-02234 CV93-10163 FORSHE_T AMBROSE v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:92-02302 CV93-10164 MARKS_ST PAYNE v. CORNING

AZ 2:92-02303 CV93-10165 MARKS_ST WOODS v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-00248 CV93-11597 SCOTT_MI RUSSELL v. COX-UPHOFF INT'L

AZ 2:93-00249 CV93-11598 SCOTT_MI EDWARDS v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

AZ 2:93-00334 CV93-11170 HOVELL_W HAMRICK v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

AZ 2:93-00376 CV93-11443 HUTTON_M CADWALLADER-SCHULZ v. AESTHETECH

AZ 2:93-00397 CV93-11445 MARKS_ST GRAVES v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-00461 CV93-11446 MCDONA_K WARREN v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-00603 CV93-12018 MARKS_ST HANCOCK v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-00669 CV93-11447 HUTTON_M WALKER-MILLER v. AESTHETECH

AZ 2:93-00689 CV93-11600 MCGROD_P SANDOZ v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-00690 CV93-11601 MCGROD_P HILL v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-00773 CV93-11602 SHILLING v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-00867 CV93-12183 MARKS_ST SCHEBLER v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01028 CV93-12184 LEE_CARR LEE v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-01029 CV93-12185 MARKS_ST HAMONDS v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01030 CV93-12186 MARKS_ST LATUNSKI v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01031 CV93-12187 MARKS_ST WOODS v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01032 CV93-12188 MARKS_ST SIGEL v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01034 CV93-12189 MARKS_ST WILSON v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01041 CV93-12190 MARKS_ST ANDERSON v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01179 CV93-12191 SCOTT_MI MATTHEWS v. DOW CORNING WRIGHT

AZ 2:93-01201 CV93-12600 KNAPP_CR CLAYTEN v. AESTHETECH

AZ 2:93-01273 CV93-12602 MARKS_ST PERALLI v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01276 CV93-12605 MARKS_ST RASMUSSEN v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01277 CV93-12606 MARKS_ST REDDIN v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01278 CV93-12607 MARKS_ST MILLS v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01283 CV93-12608 MONAHA_W HARLAN v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-01285 CV93-12610 MONAHA_W LEENY v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

AZ 2:93-01286 CV93-12611 MONAHA_W BUCHTA v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-01287 CV93-12612 MONAHA_W GEIWITZ v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-01289 CV93-12614 MONAHA_W EARLEY v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE

AZ 2:93-01384 CV93-12937 TABER_J. CAMPBELL-SAYLOR v. CUI

AZ 2:93-01385 CV93-12938 TABER_J. CRISMAN v. MEC

AZ 2:93-01386 CV93-12939 TABER_J. RODRIGUEZ v. CUI

AZ 2:93-01387 CV93-12940 LEAL_JOS HECKENS v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

AZ 2:93-01388 CV93-12941 KLEINS_R LEWIS v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

AZ 2:93-01400 CV93-12942 TABER_J. ABBATE v. CUI

AZ 2:93-01411 CV93-12943 MORRIS_J JOHNSON v. AESTHETECH

AZ 2:93-01443 CV93-12947 TIMBAN_J ROMINE v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-01444 CV93-12948 TIMBAN_J COHEN v. BRISTOL-MYERS

AZ 2:93-01455 CV93-12949 TIMBAN_J MEYERS-OZANNE v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

AZ 2:93-01461 CV93-12950 MCGROD_P MEWS v. AESTHETECH

AZ 2:93-01489 CV93-12951 MARKS_ST GOLD v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01490 CV93-12952 MARKS_ST DIXON v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01491 CV93-12953 MARKS_ST HAUPT v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01615 CV93-13709 MCGROD_P LEE v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01698 CV93-13710 SCOTT_MI STUART v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-01711 CV93-13711 MARKS_ST BLOMBERG v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01712 CV93-13712 MARKS_ST TROISI v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01713 CV93-13713 MARKS_ST TEDROW v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01714 CV93-13714 MARKS_ST CHOCKEY v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01715 CV93-13715 MARKS_ST FARNUM v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01716 CV93-13716 MARKS_ST PONEGALEK v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01729 CV93-13717 MARKS_ST VALENZUELA v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01885 CV93-13718 MARKS_ST MILLER v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01887 CV93-13720 KNAPP_CR ELIAS v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-01888 CV93-13721 HARR_JOH ESTRADA v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

AZ 2:93-01889 CV93-13722 MARKS_ST BROCK v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01890 CV93-13723 MARKS_ST HAMMAN v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-01893 CV94-10004 JOFFE_DA JOHNSON v. JENNINGS

AZ 2:93-01926 CV94-10005 JOFFE_DA LAURENS-EBERSON v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

AZ 2:93-01946 CV94-10006 HAR_JAME BERRY v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02095 CV94-10007 MARKS_ST VITTORIA v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02096 CV94-10008 MARKS_ST SHOTEY v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02098 CV94-10010 MARKS_ST DOOLITTLE v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02099 CV94-10011 MARKS_ST HENDRICKSON v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02100 CV94-10012 MARKS_ST WINNINGHAM v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02103 CV94-10013 PRIEST_M UNKEFER v. BAXTER INT'L

AZ 2:93-02147 CV94-10014 MARKS_ST DRESSLER v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02187 CV94-10015 SCOTT_MI BELCHER v. COX-UPHOFF INT'L

AZ 2:93-02207 CV94-10281 HARR_JOH HERTNECK v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

AZ 2:93-02211 CV94-10282 TIMBAN_J FOSTER v. MCGHAN MEDICAL

AZ 2:93-02212 CV94-11149 TIMBAN_J COOK v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02218 CV94-10283 TIMBAN_J SIMMS v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02219 CV94-10284 TIMBAN_J HARRISON v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02226 CV94-10285 MCGROD_P MIGNELLA v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02227 CV94-10286 MCGROD_P KORTE v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02230 CV94-10287 FRIEDM_S MARTIN v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02259 CV94-10288 MARKS_ST HOSAC v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02260 CV94-10289 MARKS_ST CUSELLA v. CORNING

AZ 2:93-02335 CV94-10290 MARKS_ST VASQUEZ v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02409 CV94-11352 MARKS_ST RADER v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02410 CV94-11353 MARKS_ST ECKER v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02411 CV94-11354 MARKS_ST BERRETT v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02412 CV94-11355 MARKS_ST MULLOY v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:93-02414 CV94-11356 HAR_JAME CARPENTER v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00048 CV94-11357 KLEINS_R TRAIL v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00090 CV94-11358 TIMBAN_J CAPPELLO v. MEC

AZ 2:94-00119 CV94-11359 HOVELL_W GUIDO v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE

AZ 2:94-00120 CV94-11360 HOVELL_W CONNELLY v. AMERICAN HEYER-SCHULTE

AZ 2:94-00121 CV94-11361 HOVELL_W LANE v. BRISTOL-MYERS

AZ 2:94-00122 CV94-11362 HOVELL_W KELLEY v. BRISTOL-MYERS

AZ 2:94-00158 CV94-11363 GILCHR_D RAMIREZ v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00215 CV94-11364 HAR_JAME GRIER v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00238 CV94-11365 MARKS_ST JONES v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00239 CV94-11366 MARKS_ST ELLISON v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00240 CV94-11367 MARKS_ST BUTZ v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00241 CV94-11368 MARKS_ST DOINE v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00242 CV94-11369 MARKS_ST STEVENS v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00243 CV94-11370 MARKS_ST WHITLOCK v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00244 CV94-11371 MARKS_ST BROWNING v. DOW CORNING

AZ 2:94-00377 CV94-12128 LEAL_JOS WATTS v. DOW CORNING




Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   33




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page