It is fair to say, then, that the liberty they professed was only for
themselvesfor the European community who might come here, the Caucasian
racenot the Negro, not the Indians, perhaps not the Asiatic or Chinese, but
for the white. Everything else professed is a falsehood, a sham . . . .
It may be asked why the framers of the Constitution did not carry out the
views enunciated by the declarers of independence, in regard to the
inalienable rights of man?... Simply because they had not the moral courage,
or power, to enforce principles that to their understanding were "selfevident
truths." Were I their apologist, I might say that, just emerging from
despotism, composed of different nationalities and a diversity of interests,
finding it impossible to agree on every principle, they thought it better, as
a compromise, to sacrifice this one and retain so many that were good, than to
lose the whole, break up in confusion and lose their national unity. But this
sacrifice has cost the nation dearly, for . . . slavery for nearly a century
has been a subject of bitterness, acrimony, heartburning and hatred, . . .
until it culminated in one of the most bloody, revengeful, fratricidal wars
recorded in history, thus exhibiting a terrible retribution for the violation
of natural law and inalienable rights.
It may be asked, if this instrument was imperfect, why do you sustain it?
Simply that, with this one fault, it was the best instrument in existence, and
it was all and more than the nation has ever lived up to. . . .
 Laboring under accumulated acts of tyranny, groaning under oppression
and wrong, smarting under the taunts of imported minions, the American people
presented the sublime spectacle of a whole continent determined to be free!
They issued the Declaration of Independence, wrenched the manacles from their
limbs and threw them as a guage at the feet of the forgers, entered into
articles of confederation, framed a Constitution, erected their liberty poles,
flung to the breeze the Stars and Stripes.... That king of birds, the eagle, .
. . was selected as their emblem. They resurrected the twin goddesses of
justice and liberty, and chimed a bell that . . . "Proclaimed liberty
throughout the land." The fire of freedom burned in every patriotic heart; and
in that instrument they were determined to perpetuate to their posterity and
succeeding generations that freedom and liberty they had wrenched from the
hand of tyranny. . . .
Here we may pause and inquire, if indeed the above is a correct
exposition of our rights and privileges as American citizens, how is it that
such infamies can transpire as have lately been exhibited in our courts? I may
here be met with the statement that we are only a Territory. True, we are only
a Territory, but we are American citizens, and have never abjured our
citizenship nor relinquished our Constitutional guarantees. . . . If the above
be trite, and the axiom of the Declarers of Independence be correct, that the
governments "derive their just powers from the consent of the governed," what
then becomes of Our Federal officers? for not one of our citizens invited
them here, or had any vote in their coming, nor was consent asked . . . .
Do men gather grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles?" Who are the
instigators of our present difficulties? Every schoolboy knows. Who have been
seeking to introduce anarchy, sedition and strife? Let our federal officers
answer. Are they not here simply as plotters of mischief, as conspirators
against the peace of  the people? Professing to administer law, have they
not been the first to break it? . . .
In fact, the Territorial government finds in the persons of Federal
officers "another government," not of the people and in violation of
Constitutional guarantees and authority, . . and asks by what authority it
presumes to set itself against the legitimate constituted authority of the
people of the Territory or State; by what authority it ignores its laws; by
what authority it overrides and tears down the safeguards of society, and
fosters in our midst drunkenness, gambling and whoredomsthose infamous
adjuncts and institutions of professed civilization; by what authority it
repudiates its officers; by what authority it interferes with the . . .
social, religious, political and moral rights .
In his fourth letter, Taylor advised that it was "very important
. . . As we are legislating on first principles and forming precedents
for unborn millions that may tread our footsteps, it is well for us to "ponder
well the path of our feet," and be careful that we introduce no principles,
advocate no system, establish no precedent or antecedent that is questionable,
unequal, unjust or oppressive; . . . and that we guard, jealously and safely,
our political rights and immunities.
It has been the opinion of many statesmen, and is a favorite dogma of
monarchists, that democracy or republicanism is only adapted for small
communities . . . . It is further urged that peoples are not capable of
selfgovernment. I might ask who, then, are? Are kings, emperors, autocrats,
presidents, judges and others more competent? History does not so instruct us.
Who are these magnates? Are they not people? Is their intelligence more
profound? Are their principles more correct, their lives more virtuous, their
blood more pure than other peoples? Let history answer.
 We are told, however, that "eternal vigilance is the price of liberty;"
and as we possess the best Constitution and the best government in the world,
let us preserve it, and transmit it intact, pure and unadulterated to our
"A Territorial government is a very peculiar organization," Taylor
pointed out. "It presents the anomalous position of monarchial rule in a
It is with very great delicacy that I would question the acts of our
legislators and statesmen. I look upon them as leading, representative men of
the greatest nation on earth. Yet, withal, they are but men, and in the heat
of debate, under partisan influences. . . . policy, political necessities,
conflicting interests and a desire to promote the public weal, they sometimes
make grave mistakes. I think that the organization of territories is one of
these, which I now proceed to examine; and will state that as there is no
Constitutional authority for such an organization, it is simply an
unauthorized jurisdiction; for the constitution is as binding upon Congress as
upon the people, and anything not authorized in that instrument is assumed.
Congress has indeed the power to admit new states into the Union . . .
but nowhere does it possess the Constitutional power to organize Territorial
governments. It possesses . . . power to dispose of and make all needful rules
and regulations respecting the "territory and other property of the United
States," but not to legislate for the inhabitants of territories, who are not
property . . . .
reference to this subject: first, that Congress, under the Constitution, has
no right to establish governments for the Territories; secondly, that under no
circumstances have they the right to pass any law to regulate the internal
affairs of the people inhabiting them." (American Statesman)
 . . . Governor Walker of Kansas, in a State paper, declares that popular
sovereignty is a power that cannot be delegated, but rests exclusively with
the people. Mr. Calhoun is also very definite on this point. . . . From the
above it is evident that the Constitution nowhere authorizes the formation of
Territorial governments, . . . and that this also is the opinion of some of
our most prominent statesmen. . . .
The Territorial question is a subject that has caused Congress
considerable trouble ever since its first organization. It is true that . . .
into the Union without Territorial tutelage.
But as party lines began to be more clearly defined, and the slavery question
pushed itself into a greater prominence before the nation, a jealousy sprang
up between the North and the South in regard to the acquisition of new States,
. . . neither party being willing to admit a Southern or Northern State
without a corresponding equivalent, so as to preserve the balance of power . .
great size had the potential of being divided into several states, all
proslavery. "There was in prospect a terrible struggle between the
proslavery and antislavery parties," Roberts states in his Life of John
Taylor. "It was thought that if a large state extending from the Pacific
Ocean eastward to Salt Lake, with slavery prohibited by its constitution,
was admitted into the Union, it would offset the late accession of Texas,
and calm the rising storm over that question."
This situation resulted in what probably was the most remarkable
irony of LDS historythat by reason of a snowstorm, Utah was to be
denied statehood for a period of 45 years. Taylor explained the
 General Wilson, as the delegate to Utah, came here in 1849 with a
request for us to unite with California and form a state, that the Territorial
question then agitating the nation might be removed from Congress. I was one
of a committee who communicated with him on that subject, being interested in
this question. (10) He informed us that if we felt unwilling to form this
union, he was requested to appeal to our patriotism to aid him in avoiding
apprehended difficulties. We acceeded to his request, . . . on the condition
that we were each, within two years, to form a separate state. . . . (11)
The other delegate, , was sent by
water to California for the same purpose. General Wilson left late in
the fall, with a part of his family and an escort. He was detained for a
length of time by a severe snowstorm, which prevented his arrival in
California at the time specified. The other delegate, not being able to wait
for him, made other arrangements with the people of California, and his
mission was thus frustrated.
Had it not been for a snowstorm, we should have been a free people. As it
is, we have been living under the worst species of despotisma satrapyfrom
that time to the present. Does freedom depend upon such adventitious
circumstances? Are the liberties of men depending upon such contingencies?
"I propose now to show," Taylor declared, "that the Territorial
governments are in violation of the people's rights, subversive of
liberty, and pernicious in their results."
A Territorial government is a relic of a monarchy, and is simply a
satrapy. In a republican state government, which Congress is authorized to
establish, the people elect their own governors, state officers, and
judiciary, and control all their internal affairs. In the government of a
 Territory it is quite the reverse: neither the government, secretary,
marshal, attorney or judge is appointed by the people; they have no more to do
with their selection or appointment than the inhabitants of Timbuctoo.
They have, it is true, a local legislature; but in Utah this is simply a
farce. The governor, with or without cause, can veto all they do, and thus the
will or vote of one hundred thousand inhabitants, represented by a
legislature, amounts to nothing, while one man, a stranger, having no
sympathies with the people, can annul all that one hundred thousand have done.
But should he not veto a bill, Congress can do so . . . . Further, should it
escape both of these tests, it is still liable to be disturbed by the
judiciary, who, with some kind of authoritycertainly not that of the
peoplereject laws at pleasure. . . .
The people are entirely ignored in the whole operation, just as much as
the serfs of Russia, or the slaves of the South previous to their freedom . .
. . It is true we have an Organic Act, and a form of government which ought to
be held sacred; but that makes no difference. are simply
playthings for children, to be given and taken at pleasure, just as mamma
says, like little boys who don't play marbles "for keeps." Our laws are
ignored, our Territorial officers are ignored, our courts are ignored, and
then our juries are worse than a farce. . . . That, however, may be accounted
for on the assertion of his honor, the Chief Justice, who, it is evident, did
informed us, to make war on a "system in the person of Brigham Young." Such is
our Territorial government.
It only remains to ask, is this what we have bargained for? Is this the
freedom that the declarers of independence and the framers of the constitution
contemplated? Is this a democratic government, republican in form?
 His honor, Chief Justice McKean, in his naturalization programme,
informed an applicant a short time ago that he was now admitted to all the
rights of an American citizen. He could now hold any office under the
government except that of President of the United States.
What are these inestimable rights with which his honor favors his
neophyte? The right to be tried by a packed juryhis sworn enemies. The right
to have his wife judicially declared a strumpet, and his children judicially
bastardized. The right to the sympathy of the judge while passing sentence of
three years hard labor in the penitentiary for living with his own wife. The
right to have his religion assailed. The right to be driven from his home
without redress. The right to vote for a legislature to make laws which any
political despot can annul at pleasure. The right to pay taxes without
representation. The right to be maligned, slandered and abused. The right to
have pimps, whorehouses, gambling saloons and debauchery forced upon him by
judicial exertion. The right to live in a satrapy. The right to die and be
vaunted republic today. Certainly the citizens of Great Britain,
France, Germany and Scandinavia ought to be glad to repudiate such infamous
tyrannies as they came from, and shout hosannah for the glorious privileges
that American citizenship gives. O, ye benighted foreigners, how you must long
for naturalization, in order that you may share with us these inestimable
privileges and blessings. (12)
In the fifth and concluding letter of the series, the Champion of
Rights recapitulated his catalogue of carpetbag oppression, then added,
"Having said so much on this subject, let me now address a few words to
You made the roads, killed the snakes, built the bridges, redeemed the
sterile desert country and made it  "blossom as the rose." And where poor
Digger Indians shivered and the wolf prowled, now exist productive farms,
pleasant orchards, beautiful gardens; and you exhibit an example of thrift,
industry, virtue, honesty and integrity that others would do well to imitate.
Your factories, your railroads, your cities and villages, erected and redeemed
your social enjoyments, your theaters, your ballrooms, your social parties,
your excellent music, your jubilant songs, and your shouts of hosannah make it
an Eden to the pure and virtuous.
But these very beauties and excellencies are your danger. Corrupt men
look upon your possessions with greedy eyes, and, like vultures, are ready to
pounce upon their prey. They want your houses and lands, your orchards,
gardens and farms, your mills, factories and mines; and these parties profess
to be shocked at your lasciviousness and would rob you by the grace of God.
Faced with this threat, Taylor counseled the people to follow a
policy of endurance and nonresistance, to refuse to be provoked to
retaliation which would constitute an excuse for conquest and pillage.
The lamb is drinking below; the wolf is fouling the water above. The big
boy is strutting about with a chip on his shoulder, daring you to knock it
off. Some pretext is needed. Don't give it to them. They want a pretext to
plunder you; their programme is to pillage, rob, ravage, lay waste and
destroy. They want your farms, and, although very virtuous, would like to
ravish your wives and daughters. Don't give them an opportunity. Let the same
wisdom that has governed your acts hitherto still be continued. They want a
cause to quarrel, that they may rob and pillage according to law. Don't give
it to them. They would like to provoke riot, bloodshed, sedition and revolt,
that they may have a pretext to destroy you. Don't work into their hands.
 Let them pack their juries from houses of ill fame to try you on virtue.
Never mind; it is their virtue that suffers, not yours. Let them try you for
living with and protecting your wives and providing for your children.
Fidelity and virtue are not crimes in the eyes of the Almighty, only in
theirs. Rotten and corrupt themselves, this clique would like to reduce you to
their level. Their aim is to strangle virtue, purity and sobriety, introduce
gambling halls, drunkenness and dens of prostitution, infamy and vice. No
matter; still be quiet.
"But they are accusing some of our best and most honorable men of
murder!" What of that? Who have they suborned as their accusers? They
themselves call them by the mild name of assassins. These are their fellow
pirates, with whom they hobnob and associate. (13) Be quiet! "But other
aggressions are contemplated. They are bent on provoking a quarrel and
mischief." No matter; it takes two to make a quarrel. Don't you be one of
them. "They offer themselves to be kicked." Don't do it; have some respect for
your boots. "But they insult us on every hand." What? They insult you? . . .
Now, who could consider himself insulted by the hissing of a snake, the attack
of a wasp, or the odor of a skunk? You would simply avoid them; it is not in
The mules in the stable below may bray in response to the clamor above;
let them manage the exhibition in the menagerie in their own way in that
delectable stable; still let them alone. (14)
But don't let us be dull and dumpish and careless. Watch every point,
note every action, keep a record of every event, exhibit every falsehood,
expose every wrong, watch and avoid them as you would the leprosy. Be vigilant
in everything and everywhere. Watch their morality and their manipulation of
mines. Follow them to their secret dens. Keep a true record of all their acts,
and the time is coming when their stench will sicken the nations.
 They and their paramours may be protected for awhile, but the covering
will fall, their pretentious purity be exposed, and their acts be bruited
through the land. Keep quiet and don't be caught napping. "Fear God and keep
your powder dry. . . ."
If they take you to the stable, close your nostrils to the stench. If
they can stand it always, you can for a short time. If your ears are offended
at their ribald exordiums, put cotton in them. If they send you to prison,
rejoice. Let them have their full swing, and they will hang themselves. Keep
quiet; but let every man in Israel make a common cause. . . . of right and
justice, against wrong and oppression. It is our cause, the cause of liberty,
the cause of humanity, the cause of God . . . .
Our Heavenly Father has committed to our trust everlasting, eternal
truths. Maintain them inviolate. Let the living fire burn in your bosom and
guard vigilantly the sacred truths that the great Elohim has committed to your
trust. Utter not their shibboleth, nor bow to their rotten, contemptible
they may put more of our friends in prison." Let them do it. . . . It will
take a big prison to hold them all. We shall have lots of company. Keep quiet!
"But they may place us under military rule." All the better. The military
are much more honorable than the judiciary. There is no law which they can
place us under that we cannot obey. We must live above all law, and nothing
can harm us "if we be followers of that which is good." So keep quiet! "But it
interferes with our material prosperity, our trade and commerce, our mines and
industries." No matter. If others can stand it, we can. Keep quiet!
There is something heroic in being able to view with firm nerves and
unblanched cheek the acts of your petty  tormentors. In former ages a
Even our Indians boast of this quality, and when a captive brave is tied to a
tree, and they are plucking off his nails, breaking his bones, and tearing his
flesh by piecemeal, he laughs at his tormentors, and tells them they don't
know how to do it. But you stand in another position. Filled with the light of
eternal truth, rejoicing in the possession of the favor of God, "having the
promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come," standing on a
more exalted platform, you can smile with complacency on their feeble attacks,
"Like Moses' bush ascend the higher,
But independent of all this, it is our very best policy to keep quiet.
The court can proceed, yet the sun will rise and set, the earth will roll on
its axis, potatoes and corn will grow irrespective of the decrees of courts.
Hitherto you have been subject to the misrepresentations and manufactured lies
from the small fry of this coterie, little whelps who lick the hands of their
master, and vomit their lies by wholesale to pervert public opinion. But they