Pharisees, who called Jesus an imposter; that he cast out devils
through Beelzebub, the prince of devils; declared that he was born of
fornication, and accused him of blasphemy.
So the same kind of persons, in these days, in the absence of truth, seek
to undermine the character of a good, honourable, and virtuous man. Hence, we
hear the hueandcry of false prophet, imposter, deceiver, blasphemer,
adulterer, etc. . . . Ministers in America join with  the drunkard,
profligate, and murderer, to hatch up stories against the Saints . . . .
Gentlemen, men of our calling ought to use other weapons. . . . The
eternal truths of God are still the same; and whether Joseph Smith was a good
man or a bad man, the truths we preach are scriptural, and you cannot gainsay
them; and if they are, what avails your attack upon character? . . .
Mr. Robertson: . . . General Bennett and Professor Caswall . . . had
testified that Joseph Smith kept up a seraglio of "Sisters of the White Veil,"
and "Sisters of the Green Veil;" and that Sidney Rigdon, who had at one time
been almost as great a man among the Mormonites as Joe Smith, had quarrelled
with Joe for the latter's attempt to introduce his, Rigdon's, daughter into
Was there not a body of men amongst the Mormonites called "Danites," or
"Destroying Angels," who were banded together to assassinate such as were
supposed to be enemies of the body? And had not Governor Boggs been
assassinated by this body? . . .
Now he (Mr. Robertson) demanded distinctly of Mr. Taylor what was the
nature of the sisterhood of the White and Green Veilswhat was the nature of
the dispute between Sydney Rigdon and Joseph Smithand what was the nature of
the society called "Danites" or "Destroying Angels?"
Elder Taylor: It would seem from the remarks of Mr. Robertson that he
C. Bennettof course for want of better testimony . . . . We have had a
terrible account of the murder of Governor Boggs, I suppose given by the Rev.
Mr. Caswall. ExGovernor Boggs is now living in California at the gold mines.
The audience burst into laughter at this information. "But I suppose
I must say that men of the profession and calling of my opponents would
have displayed a little more taste if they had possessed a little more
delicacy of feeling . . . . We are accused here of polygamy, and actions the
most indelicate, obscene, and disgusting, such that none but a corrupt and
depraved heart could have contrived. These things are too outrageous to admit
of belief; therefore, leaving the sisters of the "White Veil," the "Black
Veil," and all the other veils, with these gentlemen to dispose oftogether
with their authorsas they think best, I shall content myself by reading our
views of chastity and marriage, from a work published by us, containing some
of the articles of our Faith: Doctrine and Covenants, page 330.
Although Taylor was fully aware of the practice of plural
marriagehe himself having at least ten wives at this timeit was not
yet time to proclaim such matters to the outside world. He read Section
101 (which subsequently was deleted), which said that all church
marriages should be solemnized in public meeting, and that "Inasmuch as
this Church has been reproached with the crime of fornication and
polygamy, we declare that we believe that one man should have one wife,
and one wife but one husband, except in case of death, when either is at
liberty to marry again."
We are again soberly told about "Danites" and "Destroying Angels." I
never happened to be acquainted with any of these among the Latterday Saints.
But I can give you an account of some that I met with . . . . I was going with
my family to Far West, in the State of Missouri, and  while staying at a
place called De Witt, on the banks of the Missouri River, a mob of about 150
persons came, led on by two ministers; . . . the name of one was Sashiel
Woods, the other, Abbot Hancock. . . . They came there with swords by their
sides; . . . and with other ministers, one a Methodist of the name of Bogard,
engaged with a mob in driving about 15,000 men, women and children from their
homes in the depth of winter, after robbing and killing many in the most
barbarous manner . . . .
These deeds were principally instigated by ministers. These, gentlemen
are the destroying angels if you wish to know about them. (4)
plates. Joe pretended that an angel directed him to a certain mound to dig for
sacred plates on which a revelation was engraved . . . . These plates, said to
be buried 1400 years, were fastened together with rings, in the form of a
book, though everyone knows that in that age writings were formed into the
shape of scrolls. These plates were few in number, about six inches long, and
yet onehalf of them contained as much as the whole of the Old Testament. They
profess to refer to Jewish history, and yet they are written in Egyptian
hieroglyphics . . . .
But where the Book of Mormon came from was not long a mystery, for the
brother of one Solomon Spaulding, going to one of the meetings, recognized his
late brother's work, a romance of ancient America, which had never been
published, but of which the Mss. was lost. The widow of Solomon Spaulding
testified to the same effect, and that charge has never been replied to, to
this hour. But the great consideration is, that these persons pretend to add
to and supersede the Word of God. Now, the Bible is the sheetanchor of
Christians, and it neither needs the Book of Mormon nor any other book, nor
the assistance of Joe Smith nor any other Joe. The awful  voice of
prophecy has spoken for the last time, and the cause of inspiration is closed.
Whatever is needed by the Christian for his guidance is there, and Mr. Cater
could remind his opponents of the curse denounced by the Spirit of God against
all who added to, or subtracted from, that volume.
Elder TaylorI am prepared to answer all of these statements, and any
charges that these gentlemen can bring. We have certainly heard a strange
declaration . . . . He tells us the canon of scripture is closed, and that we
have all of the word of God that ever was written. I wonder where he studied
his Bible; for certainly we most assuredly have not got all by a great deal.
Taylor listed various books referred to in the Bible which were not
incorporated into the King James edition.
Here are sixteen books mentioned. . . . written by prophets, seers, and
revelators, under the immediate inspiration of the Almighty, and yet we have
them not. Where are they, Mr. Cater? Yet this gentleman calls us imposters
because we do not stick to the Bible . . . .
As for the charge that the Book of Mormon was a plagiarism, Taylor
submitted a clipping from the Quincy, Illinois, Whig, 17 July 1842,
containing a letter from John Haven of Holliston, Mass., to his daughter
Elizabeth at Quincy.
Your brother Jesse passed through Monson, (where the widow of Spaulding
resided) where he was in company with Mrs. Davieson (widow Spaulding), her
daughter, Mrs. McKinestry, and Dr. Ely, for many hours, during which he put to
presence of Dr. Ely.
 QuestionDid you, Mrs. Davieson, write a letter to Mr. John Storrs,
containing an account of the commencement of Mormonism? Answer: No, I did not!
And I never saw the letter until I saw it in the Boston Recorder with my name
on it. The letter was never brought to me to be signed . . . .
QuestionHave you read the Book of Mormon? Answer: I have read a little
Mormon? Answer: NOT ANY, with the exception of some names, something similar
the one to the other . . . .
QuestionWhere is the manuscript? Answer: Mr. Hurlbut came
here and took it away, promising to publish it, and said that I should have
half the proceeds.
QuestionDid Hurlbut publish the manuscript? Answer: No! He informed me
by letter that the manuscript after having been examined did not read as they
expected, and that they WOULD NOT publish it. (5)
Mr. RobertsonWhat made you believe in the Book of Mormon?
Elder TaylorFirst, its agreement with the scriptures; secondly, the
testimony in the scriptures concerning it; and thirdly, the testimony of other
Mr. Robertson demanded of Mr. Taylor . . . to prove their prophet spoke
the truth, and "that he had seen angels as he declared he had . . . . Did he
ever see any miracles performed by Joseph Smith? . . .
Elder Taylor . . . I do not believe that the truth of a prophet's
testimony depends upon miracles. Jesus says there never was a greater prophet
than John, yet John did  no miracles. . . . What miracles did Isaiah,
Jeremiah, Hosea, Habakul or Ezekiel do? Yet they were prophets.
Robertson pressed Taylor for evidence of miracles. Taylor said he
had thousands of testimonies, and he Bolton read a letter from the
Millennial Star, dated Bristol, 25 November 1849.
Dear President PrattAs you were so kind as to publish the letter I
sent, dated July 9, 1849, containing an account of the miraculous power of God
displayed in the healing of Elizabeth Ann Bounsell, which made quite a stir
and say that the above circumstances caused many to call at the house to see
if it were true; and upon seeing, many rejoiced. Others mocked, saying, "She
would have got well if the elders had not laid their hands upon her." Amongst
the latter was one wouldbe great man, by the name of Charles Smith (who has
written a flimsy tract against the Latterday Saints), who said it was not
enough to satisfy him. So the mother took another of her daughters, and put
her upon his knee and said, "Sir, is that child blind?" And after he had
examined her eyes, he said, "She is." "Well," said the mother, "she was born
blind, and she is now four years old; and I am going to take her to the elders
of the Church, for them to anoint her eyes with oil, and lay hands upon her;
and you can call again when you have time, and see her with her eyes opened;
for I know the Lord will heal her, and she will see." "Well," said he, "if she
does ever see, it will be a great proof." Accordingly the mother brought the
child to the elders, and Elder J. Jackwell anointed her eyes, and laid hands
upon her only once; and the Lord heard his prayer, so that the child can see
now with both of her eyes as well as any other person, for which we all feel
thankful to our Heavenly Father, and are willing to bear testimony of it to
all the world . . . .
 P.S. We, the father and mother of the child, do here sign our names to
the above, as being true.
Elder TaylorHere is the address of the parents of the child; anyone who
is dissatisfied can write to them and obtain the information.
Mr. Taylor then continuedWhen I commenced searching after truth, I did
not pursue the same course that you have doneseek to impugn the motives and
destroy the characters of individuals. I did not believe the truth was to be
obtained by opposing it. I examined the doctrines and compared them with the
Word of God . . . .
If these men have the truth, it is certainly very easy to detect error by
comparison. A man acquainted with coins can easily detect a counterfeit; it is
not necessary for him to find out the character of the man who made it . . . .
I can very soon detect any false system by comparing it with the scriptures;
but these gentlemen, having so bungling a counterfeit themselves, of course
are not proper to judge, and do not understand the true test. They are afraid
of the scriptures, because they destroy their own systems.
Despite publicity attached to the debate, there was little interest
at Boulogne in Mormonism. However, out of the experience Taylor prepared
a missionary tract, Three Nights' Public Discussion . . . at
productive of good."
He sent copies to his family, noting that "I published two editions,
making 16,000," which indicates its immediate popularity.
 (1) JD 1:16.
(2) Letter to Orson Hyde for the Frontier Guardian; reprinted MS 15
(3) The opinions of the clergymen were based on three strongly
unfriendly books: Henry Caswall's The City of the Mormons, J. B. Turner's
Mormonism in All Ages, and John C. Bennett's History of the Saints.
(4) Once again, Taylor is following the prophet's admonition never
to betray his brethren. Existence of the Danites as a Mormon guerilla
organization during the war in Missouri is a matter of sworn court
testimony, not only by apostates but by such men as Orson Hyde and W. W.
Phelps. Hyde and Phelps repented at having revealed military secrets by
giving testimony, but never said it was untrue.
(5) The Spaulding manuscript had vanished. A number of years after
this debate at Boulogne, it was discovered, and was published by the
church to establish that there was no similarity between it and the Book
 Chapter 11
THE SOUR SUGAR BEET STORY
Taylor "proceeded immediately after the discussion to Paris in
company with Br. Bolton, and Br. Pack remained at Boulogne."
I have organized a church in Paris to whom I have frequently spoken in
French, though I must say my French is not very perfect. I have baptized
several learned men; one had been a Jesuit priest, another an assistant editor
to a newspaper, and other learned men; all of them have been educated at
college and understand several languages. One of these, a young man, has
commenced preaching and baptizing in the country and hundreds are coming to
hear him. (1)
It is very difficult however on account of the laws, they
are so very rigid . . . . I had an interview with some of the government
authorities who treated me with the greatest courtesy and I expected to get
from them permission to preach the gospel throughout France; but instead of
this, they have utterly prohibited us from preaching anywhere throughout the
country. I presume they are afraid of excitement, for just about the time that
that tore down the Saints' meeting house and very much abused many of the
Saints . . . .
I have published a pamphlet on the first principles of the gospel. It is
not lawful to circulate them, but I contrive to do it and evade the law.
Large meetings also were prohibited, but he managed to hold
conference in Paris, and to establish a monthly paper, L'Etoile du
He was not sufficiently acquainted with French to prepare it for the press.
However, we have brethren that are as competent as any in France. The revision
is now going on. With one of our brethren we read over together Bro. Bolton's
translation. Our translator regulates the grammar and I the doctrinal points,
and among us all we shall, I believe, have a good translation. (2)
Later, Taylor wrote the family that the Book of Mormon was being
printed. "You will have some little idea of the trouble when I tell you
it has been written three times over." However, he finally was satisfied.
We have got a translation of the Book of Mormon, as good a one as it is
possible for anybody to make. I fear no contradiction to this statement . . .
. I had it examined and tested by some of the best educated men in France....
The translation is good, the printing, is good, and the paper is good.
I have made some little alterations; that is, I have marked the
paragraphs, and numbered them; . . . and in some instances where the
paragraphs are very long, I have divided them. The original simplicity of the
book is retained, and it is as literal as the genius and idiom of the French
language would admit. (3)
Taylor's sleep was broken one night by "a dream that troubled me
very much." Three times he saw his wife, Leonora, "lying sick at the
point of death."
On the following morning I . . . a Protestant minister, and he
observed that my countenance looked sorrowful, and enquired the cause. I told
him that my wife was lying at the point of death, and he asked if I had
received a letter. I told him no; but related to him how it had been shown to
me. But, I said, I got up and prayed the  Lord to spare her life, and I
feel consoled in knowing that she will be healed . . . .
He heard my prayer. I took note of the circumstances at the time, and
be united again with his family after two years. However, an Epistle
from the First Presidency counseled that he, together with other
members of the Twelve who were in the mission field, should stay
I start in about a week for Germany. I have got a tract or pamphlet now
translated into German and am making arrangements about the Book of Mormon. I
don't know but that I shall have to go alone into that land, for there is no
one in England that I can find that will be of any use to me . . . . however,
it makes but very little difference to me. The Lord can control affairs in one
place the same as in another, and all will be well.
I go to that land as I go elsewhere, in the name of Israel's God; if He
goes with me, all is well.
However, Taylor did find help in the translation. He corresponded
with George Viett, a German teaching in France, concerning it.
You in your letter speak about the Book of Mormon. I will give you my
views about it . . . . It is extremely difficult for any person without me
being present, to translate it, and in fact there are some points that could
not be translated correctly without meor someone else as well acquainted
with the doctrinal pointsbeing present.
 I found this to be particularly the case in the French translation. You
are aware that it requires more than a knowledge of words to translate the
Book of Mormon, Bible, or any other inspired record; we must know the ideas
intended to be conveyed before we can represent them correctly in another
language. And thus no matter how learned or well qualified a man might be as a
translator, he would need assistance . . . to make a perfect work and prepare
it for the press. (5)
"I wished to be perfectly satisfied that the translation was right,"
Brother Richards and I heard some of it read at Boulogne, and
we thought it was very good; but still it had to be altered. I, therefore, got
some of the best professors in the city of Hamburg to look over it. Some few
alterations were necessary, but not many . . . .
I have often heard men in, this country sputter a great deal about the
the spirit and intention of the language that are to be looked at, and if the
translator does not know this, it is impossible for him to translate
correctly; and this is the reason why there are so many blunders in the Bible.
In addition to his missionary labors, Taylor was busy in arranging
industries in Deseret. He wrote Brigham Young:
You in your epistle speak about manufacturing sugar, etc. Since then I
have organized a company to manufacture sugar at home instead of having the
merchants carry it to the valley; but it will need a little of your counsel
and assistance in the matter.
The company will bring out apparatus and machinery to manufacture from
150 to 300 tons of sugar in the fall  of 1852, providing the beets can be
raised and prepared. I have selected and forwarded upwards of twelve
hundredweight of the best French beet seed for this purpose. . . . The
average crop in France is 35,000 lbs. of beets to the acre. What you can raise
in the valley, of course, I do not know. It is a crop, however, that will pay
better than any other kind . . . .
I would here state that there is also another company organized for the
purpose of establishing a large woolen manufactory. The best machinery will be
brought that can be purchased in England, and men brought to work it. If fine
merino wool can be obtained, as good cloth can be manufactured as in the west
of England . . . . The company will probably bring one or two thousand sheep,
merinos, if . . . possible, as fine wool is absolutely necessary for
broadcloth and fine women's wear. This company are all brethren, and I believe
wish to do right. (7)
At conference, held in Carpenters' Hall, Manchester, October 1850,
Taylor called for "the emigration of mechanics to the Valley, that we may
manufacture our own materials."
This is absolutely necessary for every people to attend to, if they wish
to prosper . . . . We have a rich soil, and a good climate, but there are many
inconveniences we have to suffer for want of home manufactures. We have to
transport from a distant country many things that are necessary to meet our
wants . . . .
Some people are anxious to obtain money, but it is labour that is true
wealth . . . . What is wealth? If a man has food, and clothing, and horses,
and carriages, and houses, and lands, he is generally considered a wealthy man