Statement of the hypothesis: The data will show a direct impact on students grades moving from a 100-point system where an A = 90 – 100, B = 80 – 89, C = 70 – 79, D = 60 – 69 and F = 0 – 59 to a 12 point grading system where A = 12, B = 9, C = 6, D = 3, F = 0.
References Bellanca, J. (1992). How to grade (if you must). In A. L. Costa, J. Bellanca, & R. Fogarty (Eds.), If minds matter: A foreward to the future (Vol. 2, pp. 297-311). Palatine, IL: Skylight.
Brualdi, A. (1998). Implementing performance assessment in the classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(2). Retrieved January 13, 2001 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=2
Brookhart, S. M. (1994) Teacher’s grading: Theory and practice. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(4), 279-301.
Butler, C. (2004). Are students getting a free ride? New York Teacher June 2, 2004. Retrieved on February 7, 2011 from http://nysut.org/newyorkteacher/2003-2004/040602grading.html
Guskey, T.R. (2009). Practical solutions for serious problems in standards-based grading. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Marzano, R. J. (2000) Transforming Classroom Grading.Alexandria, VA 22311-1714: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
McClincy, W. D. (2002). Chapter 10, evaluation tools. In Prentice Hall (2nd edition), Instructional Methods in Emergency Services (pp.153-187). Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458: Pearson Education, Inc. McMillan, J. H., (2000). Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(8). Retrieved January 13, 2011 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=8
Millet, I. (2010) Improving grading consistency through grade lift reporting. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 15(4). Retrieved January 14, 2011 from http:/pareonline.net/pdf/v15n4.pdf
Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance assessment and scoring rubrics. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 8(14). Retrieved January 14, 2011 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=14
O’Conner, K. (2009). How to grade for learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Reedy, R. (1995). Formative and summative assessment: A possible alternative to the grading-reporting dilemma. NASSP Bulletin, 79(572), 47-51.
Reeves, D. B. (2004). The case against the zero. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(4). 324-325.
Simon, M., & Renee forgetter-Giroux (2001). A rubric for scoring postsecondary academic skills. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(18). Retrieved January 13, 2011 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=18
Stiggins, R. J. (1990). Developing sound grading practices (classroom assessment training).Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
William, D. (2007). Content then process: Teacher learning communities in the service of formative assessment. In D. Reeves (Ed.), Ahead of the curve: The power of assessment to transform teaching and learning (pp. 183-204). Bloomington. IN: solution Tree.
Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (2005). How to get your students to pass their tests. In H. Wong Publications (3rd edition), How to Be an Effective Teacher: The First Days of School (pp. 229-243). Mountain View, CA 94043: Harry K. Wong Publications, Inc.
Wormeli, R. (2006). Accountability: Teaching though assessment and feedback, not grading. American Secondary Education 34(3),14-27.