Process-Specific Constraints in Optimality Theory



Download 178.73 Kb.
Page7/7
Date02.06.2016
Size178.73 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7

References
Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 1994. Featural alignment. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J.

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 1995. Kalabari vowel harmony. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J.

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. To appear. Featural affixation. Journal of Linguistics.

Archangeli, Diana. 1984. Underspecification in Yawelmani phonology and morphology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. [New York: Garland Press, 1988.]

Archangeli, Diana, and Douglas Pulleyblank. 1987. Maximal and minimal rules: Effects of tier scansion. In Proceedings of NELS 17, 16–35. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Archangeli, Diana, and Douglas Pulleyblank. 1994. Grounded Phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Beckman, Jill. 1994. Fill 'er up: An Optimality Theory analysis of Shona height harmony. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America annual meeting, Boston.

Beckman, Jill. 1995. Shona height harmony: Markedness and positional identity. In Beckman et al., eds., 1995, 53–75.

Beckman, Jill, Laura Walsh Dickey, and Suzanne Urbanczyk, eds. 1995. University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Benua, Laura. 1995. Identity effects in morphological truncation. In Jill Beckman et al., eds. 1995, 77–136.

Benua, Laura. Forthcoming. Phonological relations between words. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Broselow, Ellen. 1982. On predicting the interaction of stress and epenthesis. Glossa 16: 115–132.

Broselow, Ellen. 1984. Default consonants in Amharic morphology. In MIT working papers in linguistics 7, 15–32. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

Chomsky, Noam. 1994. Bare phrase structure. In MIT occasional papers in linguistics 5. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Cohn, Abigail C. 1995. Non-derivational phonetics and its relation to phonology. Colloquium, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 28 April, 1995.

Cole, Jennifer S. and Charles W. Kisseberth. 1994. An Optimal Domains theory of harmony. Cognitive Science Technical Report UIUC-BI-CS-94-02 (Language Series). The Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana. [Rutgers Optimality Archive #22.]

Davis, Stuart. 1995. Emphasis spread in Arabic and Grounded Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 465–498.

Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

Herzallah, Rukayyah. 1990. Aspects of Palestinian Arabic phonology: A non-linear approach. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

Hewitt, Mark and Megan Crowhurst. 1995. Conjunctive constraints and templates. Talk presented at NELS 26, Cambridge, MA.

Itô, Junko. 1986. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [New York: Garland Press, 1988.]

Itô, Junko. 1989. A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 217–259.

Itô, Junko, Armin Mester, and Jaye Padgett. 1995. NC: Licensing and underspecification in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry xxx: xxx–xxx.

Kaun, Abigail. 1995. The typology of rounding harmony: An Optimality Theoretic approach. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1981. Vowel harmony. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Kirchner, Robert. 1993. Turkish vowel disharmony in Optimality Theory. Talk presented at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1, New Brunswick, N.J., October.

Kirchner, Robert. 1995. Contrastiveness is an epiphenomenon of constraint ranking. Forthcoming in Berkeley Linguistics Society Proceedings.

Leben, Will. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

Levergood, Barbara. 1984. Rule governed vowel harmony and the strict cycle. In Proceedings of NELS 14, 275–293. GSLA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Lowenstamm, Jean and Jonathan Kaye. 1986. Compensatory lengthening in Tiberian Hebrew. In Studies in Compensatory Lengthening, ed. Leo Wetzels and Engin Sezer, 97–146. Dordrecht: Foris.

McCarthy, John. 1986. OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 207–263.

McCarthy, John. 1993. The parallel advantage: containment, consistency, and alignment. Handout of talk presented at ROW-1, October 22–24, 1993.

McCarthy, John. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology III: Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form, ed. Patricia Keating, 191–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1993a. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J. [To appear, MIT Press.]

McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1993b. Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, ed. Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1994. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. In Proceedings of NELS 24, 333–79. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

McCarthy, John J., and Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Jill Beckman et al., eds., 1995, 249–384.

Myers, Scott. 1987. Tone and the structure of words in Shona. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Myers, Scott. 1995. OCP effects in Optimality Theory. Ms., University of Texas, Austin [Rutgers Optimality Archive #6.]

Paradis, Carole and Jean-François Prunet, eds. 1991. The Special Status of Coronals: Internal and External Evidence. San Diego: Academic Press.

Piggott, Glyne and Rajendra Singh. 1985. The phonology of epenthetic segments. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 30: 415–453.

Poser, William. 1982. Phonological representations and action at a distance. In The Structure of Phonological Representations, ed. Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith, vol. 2, 121–158. Dordrecht: Foris.

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1991. Linguistics 247: Notes on connectionism and harmony theory in linguistics. In Technical Report CU CS 533 91. Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.

Prince, Alan, and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J. and University of Colorado, Boulder. [To appear, MIT Press.]

Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1993. Vowel harmony and Optimality Theory. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Phonology, 1–18. Associção Portuguesa de Linguística, University of Coimbra, Portugal.

Pulleyblank, Douglas. 1994. Neutral vowels in Optimality Theory: A comparison of Yoruba and Wolof. Ms., University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

Ringen, Catherine, and Robert Vago. 1995. Hungarian vowel harmony in Optimality Theory. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America annual meeting, New Orleans.

Ringen, Catherine, and Robert Vago. To appear. A constraint based analysis of Hungarian vowel harmony. In Approaches to Hungarian 5, ed. István Kenesei.

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1981. Epenthesis and degenerate syllables in Cairene Arabic. In MIT working papers in linguistics 3, 111–140. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Harmony, markedness, and phonological activity. Revised handout of a paper presented at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1, New Brunswick, N.J. [Rutgers Optimality Archive #37.]

Spring, Cari. 1994. The Axininca future reflexive — resolved. Paper presented at the 23rd Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL XXIII), October 22–24, 1993, University of Washington, Seattle.

Stampe, David 1972. How I spent my summer vacation [A dissertation on natural phonology]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago. [1981. New York: Garland.]

Younes, Munther. 1982. Problems in the segmental phonology of Palestinian Arabic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.



Younes, Munther. 1993. Emphasis spread in two Arabic dialects. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics V, ed. Mushira Eid and Clive Holes, 119–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dept. of Linguistics

Box 37130, South College

University of Massachusetts

Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
jmccarthy@linguist.umass.edu

Notes
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant SBR-9420424. I am indebted to John Alderete, Jill Beckman, Laura Benua, Stuart Davis, Linda Lombardi, and two anonymous referees for Linguistic Inquiry. I am particularly grateful to Alan Prince, whose suggestions have significantly reshaped this article.


1 It is by no means clear that RTR is the right distinctive feature for emphasis in Arabic (see Herzallah 1990 and McCarthy 1994 for alternatives), but since this issue is not relevant to my remarks here, I adopt Davis’s assumption to simplify comparison with his original article.

2 Under the opposite ranking, F >> M, the structural constraint does not affect the underlying surface map. Nonetheless, it may still be active when the dominating constraint F is irrelevant. This situation, dubbed “emergence of the unmarked” in McCarthy and Prince (1994), derives from the OT claim that constraints are universal but their ranking differs from grammar to grammar (Prince and Smolensky 1993).

3 In Correspondence Theory (McCarthy and Prince 1995), Stay-ATR is called Ident(ATR) and is formalized as in (i). (The string S1 is the input; S2 refers to the output.)

4 For an alternative, see Beckman (1995).

5 See Prince and Smolensky 1993: Chapter 4 and Myers 1995 for detailed discussion of such blocking configurations.

6 The details of RTR contrast in Palestinian Arabic are quite complex — see Younes 1982 and Herzallah 1990 for data and analysis. Davis does not address most of the particulars, and neither will I, but I will call attention to an issue that comes up in this connection.

7 The ranking RTR-Left >> RTR-Right, required in both Palestinian dialects, is perhaps to be related to the well-known bias for anticipatory over perseverative coarticulation.

8 An anonymous reviewer avers that this restrictive prediction of OT holds true only in a monostratal implementation but not in a multistratal one. If a single language contains several serially-connected OT grammars, each with its own constraint hierarchy, it might be possible to get the descriptive effect of Davis’s hypothetical dialect in the ultimate output, even though no individual stratum can support the mutually incompatible rankings in () .

9

Davis (1995: (10)) proposes that the feature RTR is feature-geometrically dependent on Lower-VT. Accordingly, when rules like () spread RTR onto segments that lack a Lower-VT node, one is generated automatically to maintain consistency of feature-geometric structure. This operation of Node Generation is a standard assumption in the framework Davis adopts (Archangeli and Pulleyblank 1994: 23).



10 Explicit discussions of this general problem include Poser 1982, Archangeli and Pulleyblank 1987, 1994, Myers 1987, 1995, and Itô, Mester, and Padgett 1995.

11 This attraction of RTR to a can perhaps be connected with Cohn’s 1995 idea that phonological specifications must be saliently realized, with ideas about perceptual salience in Optimal Domains Theory (Cole and Kisseberth 1994), and with Kaun’s 1995 proposal that a function of harmony is to maximize the perceptual salience of otherwise hard-to-hear contrasts.

12 When the string of Lower-VT segments ends in a guttural consonant, rather than a, RTR-to-a will prevail over lower-ranked RTR-Right, selecting Ta nak rather than Ta nak. This transcriptional nuance is inconsequential, since impressionistic phonetic evidence cannot tell us whether or not the pharyngeal consonant is RTR. If instrumental phonetic evidence should confirm that Ta nak is a more accurate transcription, then RTR-to-a could be replaced by a constraint demanding that the RTR span end on a Lower-VT segment, subsuming a and the gutturals.

13 Spring 1994 presents a similar argument about the nature of epenthetic consonants: in Axininca Campa, epenthetic t behaves no differently from underlying t in undergoing palatalization.

14 Since epenthetic segments are typically unmarked, this assumption is necessary in any theory that equates unmarkedness with underspecification.



Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page