Bibliogrpahy
1. Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Submission on CLERP 9 Corporate disclosure: strengthening the financial reporting framework, November 2002
2. Australian Stock Exchange, 2002, Draft Business Rule Guidance Note : Independence of Research, Disclosure of Conflict & Dealing Before Research Recommendations
3. Bollen, R, 2003, Research Analysts and the Australian Market Misconduct Regime,
Murdoch Univeristy Electronic Journal of Law, Vol 10, No. 2
4. Boni, L. and Womack, K. L., 2002, Solving the Sell-Side Research Problem: Insights from Buy-Side Professionals. Working Paper
5. Bruce, B., 2002, Stock Analysts: Experts on Whose Behalf?, The Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, Vol. 3, No.4, 198-201
6. Choi, S. and Fisch, J., How to Fix Wall Street: A Voucher Financing Proposal (Working Paper)
7. Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, (2001) Analyzing the Analysts, Serial No. 107-25
8. Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, Consumer Action, and U.S. Public Interest Research Group, 2001, Wall Street Research Conflicts of Interest: An assessment of Industry Proposals and Recommendations for Reform
9. Hains, M., 2002, Are analysts really independent?, Aust Corp Law – Bulletin No. 21 – 25 October 2002
10. Fisch, J. and Sale, H. A.., 2003, The Securities Analyst as Agent: Rethinking the Regulation of Analysts, 88 Iowa L. Rev. 1035
Mitchell, L. E., (2003), The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Reinvention of Corporate Governance?, http://ssrn.com/abstract=474761
11. Securities and Exchange Commission, Final Rule: Regulation Analysts Certification, 17 CFR PART 242, April 14, 2003, www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8193.htm (accessed 4 February 2005)
12. Sirri, E., 2004, Investment Banks, Scope, and Unavoidable Conflicts of Interest, Working Paper prepared for the Financial Markets Conference, Wall Street against the Wall: Transparency and Conflicts of Interest
Share with your friends: |