Not to be published in the official reports

I. Sufficiency of the Evidence

Download 72.26 Kb.
Size72.26 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   20
I. Sufficiency of the Evidence

Appellant asserts that the restitution award ordered by the court was not supported by sufficient evidence because: (1) the evidence presented at the hearing failed to establish the value of the jewelry taken in the First Burglary; (2) the court awarded restitution for a piece of jewelry—the emerald necklace—that had been returned to Newmar; and (3) insufficient evidence supported the award of incidental expenses, and that award of the expenses was not limited to those losses suffered in the First Burglary.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   20

The database is protected by copyright © 2020
send message

    Main page