non statutory Asseveration/Affidavit of Criminal complaint
) Subscribed, Sworn, Sealed
Parkland County )
I, Me, My, or Myself, also known as minister Edward-Jay-Robin : house of Belanger, having been duly sworn, depose and say to be true as far as I am capable of knowing and expressing.
1 All the Facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, are not hearsay, are not
misleading, but are admissible as evidence, if not rebutted and proven inaccurate, and if
testifying, I shall so state, and further,
2. I have standing in God’s law in capacity as God’s minister to act and profess as a watchman as to all the lawful matters herein, and further,
3. I have personal, executive and documented knowledge of the Facts stated herein, and
4 I am a living on the land known as Alberta, and further,
5 I am a sovereign living soul, a minister of Yahushua/Jesus the Christ, and further,
6 I am not in the military, nor defined in all capitals as a nom de gerre and further,
7 I am not a Canadian citizen or US citizen, (so-called) 14th Amendment citizen, or other fictitious entity, as found in the Edmonton Vital statistics registry of live births as a legal fiction registry of an event recorded as EDWARD JAY ROBIN BELANGER and the mention of US case law is per the 11th amendment to the US Constitution and the registry in 1934 of the corporation called CANADA ceded into the US securities registry as a subordinate corporation of the United States and the provisions of Ezekiel 33:6-10 wherein I act as the watchman making no use .of the dead law of corporations.
"Therefore, the U.S. citizens [citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an "individual entity."
Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.
“A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)
8 Even though I am not a Canadian citizen , I am a man born upon, living and ministering on the geographical land mass known as Canada, and further,
9 Neither the men or woman listed herein and acting as the judge in Stony Plain on August 4th 2010 named Caffaro, The man acting as the Judge Ayotte in Stony Plain,The man acting as the Judge Fuller in Stony Plain The man acting as the federal crown prosecutor for CANADA named Adam Halliday The man acting as the federal minister of Justice for CANADA Robert Nicholson, the woman acting as the minister of health for CANADA Leona Aglukkaq with authority over the civil legislation The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act Ultra Vires of the Biblical gift of Genesis 1:29, The man acting as the, Minister of Public Safety for Canada in charge of the RCMP Vic Toews, The minister of Justice and Attorney General for THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA Alison Redford, and the chief prosecutor for the PROVINCE OF ALBERTA Steven Bilodeau, and Malina Rawluk prosecutor for THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA Stony Plain nor the Superintendent of Canada Border Protection Services Agency, , nor any other government entity, nor any BAR member, nor any “person” anywhere is competent in any of My affairs, and further,
It is my belief with witnesses affidavits confirmation the afore mentioned did criminally conspire without authority of law and did intend tointimidate thereby breached their trust as Allegiants of the Christian Defender of the faith to save my faith harmless from reproach. I asked the man named Caffaro on August 4th 2010in Stoney Plain Alberta at 10:00 AM if he was aware I could not violate my sincerely held faith of not associating my name with a dead entity in law a legal fiction all capital letter version of my name used as a pledge to trade as value on the stock exchange. My diligent efforts have been rewarded with intimidation, insults, discrimination, assault kidnapping and unlawful confinement. I have by the herein so included excerpts of letters cases etc. do provide so as to provide clarity to effect clear cause for my complaint.
so as to provide clarity to effect clear cause for my complaint.
Government Of The Province Of Alberta
1A Sir Winston Churchill Sq NW Suite A, Edmonton, AB, CA
Government Of The Province Of Alberta Also Traded as Provincial Archives of Alberta
8555 Roper Rd NW, Edmonton, AB, CA
Government Of The Province Of Alberta Also Traded as Provincial Court of Alberta
237 Jasper St W, Hinton, AB, CA
Government Of The Province Of Alberta Also Traded as Provincial Court of Alberta
Government of the Province of Alberta Also Traded as Provincial Courts
5210 49 Ave, Camrose, AB, CA
Government Of The Province Of Alberta Also Traded as Provincial Court
190 Chippewa Rd, Sherwood Park, AB, CA
Government Of The Province Of Alberta Also Traded as Provincial Court
4711 44 Ave, Stony Plain, AB, CA
Government Of The Province Of Alberta Also Traded as Provincial Court Alberta Criminal Div
SeMonitor My Business Credit |
Product List | D&B Data Quality | Glossary | FAQs | Refund Policy
The Crimes of The man acting as judge named Caffaro as is evident by his actions on the 4th of August 2010 wherein it was observed by witnesses undersigned that I as God’s minister attended the Court room 01 in Stony Plain Alberta to fulfill a promise to appear on that date that was obtained on June 21st at Fort Saskatchewan Correctional Centre obtained by intimidating me that if I told the truth on that document and signed that appearance notice with a false version of my name on it under protest of threat duress and intimidation they would not let me out of incarceration at the Ft. Saskatchewan Correctional Centre.
(Please think for a moment…Who has any authority to form my name other than what I dictate?)
I did put my name to those fraudulently formed documents with the letters U.D.I. of notation at the end of everyplace I was intimidated to put my name in ink.. U.D.I. means under Duress and Intimidation. Section 55 and 57 of the Canadian Bills of Exchange act
Holder in Due Course
Holder in due course
55. (1) A holder in due course is a holder who has taken a bill, complete and regular on the face of it, under the following conditions, namely,
(a) that he became the holder of it before it was overdue and without notice that it had been previously dishonoured, if such was the fact; and
(b) that he took the bill in good faith and for value, and that at the time the bill was negotiated to him he had no notice of any defect in the title of the person who negotiated it.
(2) In particular, the title of a person who negotiates a bill is defective within the meaning of this Act when he obtained the bill, or the acceptance thereof, by fraud, duress or force and fear, or other unlawful means, or for an illegal consideration, or when he negotiates it in breach of faith, or under such circumstances as amount to a fraud.
R.S., c. B-5, s. 56.
Right of subsequent holder
56. A holder, whether for value or not, who derives his title to a bill through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting it, has all the rights of that holder in due course as regards the acceptor and all parties to the bill prior to that holder.
R.S., c. B-5, s. 57.
Presumption of value
57. (1) Every party whose signature appears on a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to have become a party thereto for value.
Presumed holder in due course
(2) Every holder of a bill is, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, deemed to be a holder in due course, but if, in an action on a bill, it is admitted or proved that the acceptance, issue or subsequent negotiation of the bill is affected with fraud, duress or force and fear, or illegality, the burden of proof that he is the holder in due course is on him, unless and until he proves that, subsequent to the alleged fraud or illegality, value has in good faith been given for the bill by some other holder in due course.
R.S., c. B-5, s. 58.
10 I as God’s minister am not a bankrupt entity like the debtor criminal corporations UNITED STATES, or CANADA, and I
have in My possession, much more than one hundred dollars in lawful money (twenty each,
one ounce silver maple leaf coins with a face value of five dollars each), and further,
11 I have recently converted some silver to land with all of the rights and privileges of the
original land patent, therefore I have absolute ownership in land, and further,
12 I am not a beneficiary of your trust as per the definitions of the Canadian Ownership Control and Determination Act ,an Act of the Canadian parliament, I have always waived and continue to waive all alleged benefits and DEMAND that My servants honor their oath of office by protecting My
unalienable rights, and further,
13 My name so all here so noticed can never be confused or under any assumption otherwise,is private and the property of Yahushua/Jesus Christ, My Christian given name is Edward-Jay-Robin: house of Belanger and
My proper address is;
with a postal address of;
C/O 10620-112St #2,
No code non commercial
and for anyone who wishes to communicate with Me, my name shall in respect for my sincerely and deeply held faith and beliefs shall be shown in exact form with no alterations whatsoever as my name is ecclesiastically Copy written as per the |Notice in the 2004 Quesnel Observer, unless they want to be guilty of mail fraud, conversion and coercion and further become consenting and contractually bound debtors to the Church.
Private copyright notice to all private parties acting as private commercial enterprise and all public officials, regarding the religious beliefs of defending the ancient right of name’s and physical place’s, spiritual or temporal, or corporations sole, being:
having indicated the names as indicated, all take notice, they may not be used, altered in whole or in part, edited, revised, reversed uppercase capitalized or copied
Violation penalties range from $5,000.00-$25,000.00 (fivethousand to twenty five thousand)Canadian Dollars in Goldmaple leaf coin for each private abuse and $25,000.00 to$1,000,000.00 (twenty five thousand to one million )Canadian Dollars in Gold maple leaf coin for each and every corporate commercial abuse.
14 It is my intent, Never to act as surety, or in any be the guarantor,,a pledge.or an
accommodation party for the fictitious entities created by government officials through
Fraud, Coercion, Intimidation, and Perjury of oath, and I am not responsible for
anything that the fraudulently created unincorporated corporation BELANGER Robin Jay does, and further, I Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger am not associated with BELANGER Robin Jay as an AKA or otherwise.
15 Because of unlawful and criminal conversion of My name and the names of My family members, I have ecclesiastically copyrighted and claimed the name(s) Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger, or any derivative(s) thereof and others as found in the Judicial Notice of April 9thst 2001 recorded in the record of the Court of Queen’s Bench.
number 00030494AC which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and further,
00030494AC Judicial notice of intent April9th2001A.D.
Hello fellow brothers and sisters in the gift of life. I write to you with intent to make you privately aware of who I am and what I believe. It is under threat duress and intimidation by unlawful authority that causes me to offer this notice of the present and future good faith and intent of the man or woman that maybe unlawfully kidnapped,detained and forced against his or her faith to comes before the defacto Canadian courts whether provincial and federal. I as God’s creation and under his law being of sound mind and of an expert capacity in matters such as unlawfully being forced to appear before the de facto court and this man under God as his savior and creator is in truth declared to be known by his fraudulently obtained birth record name in correct English grammatical form and no other than such form as Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger and relating to no other record of the name other than that which is live birth record verifiable via the vital statistics record under the authority of Barry Haugrud in Edmonton, director of records for vital statistics being recorded in a grammatically incorrect form, a violation 366 of the Canadian Criminal code and being recorded as born on the 29th day of September in the year of our Lord 1952, in the province of Alberta in its capital city of Edmonton as of this date the deponent herein proclaims and is stated for the courts notice that at this moment he is performing a function of his calling as an officiating minister of God of the Church of the Ecumenical Redemption International, living in the geographical local of the State of Awareness within my skin.. No one is offered permission to alter any record, inclusive of my name, in any form or fashion without my hand authorized written consent. I offer the allegiant and non allegiant agents of her majesty and the courts inclusive no consent or permission to assume or presume my intent is of a negative purpose as my intent is hereby declared in truth and is of good will as follows and is displayed by such words of intent . . .
The intent of the character and nature of style of Queens and Kings and the power of their oath is sacred; their persons are inviolable; they are the anointed of the Lord, and vested of powers by virtue of their office. Their power is broad based upon the Will of God, and not on the shifting whims of the people's will . . . They are to be spoken of with exulting reverence, instead of being abused by official public disdain, and by the very allegiants sworn to them. It becomes a sacrilege to violate their persons, dignity and style, and every indignity offered to them, be it in denial of allegiance, a word or act, becomes an indignity offered to God Himself. It is this view of Royal rule and style, sanctioned via a coronation, that alone can keep alive, in a scoffing and licentious age, the spirit of ancient loyalty to justice. It is that spirit begotten of faith, combining in itself in obedience, reverence, and love for the majesty of Queens and Kings which was at once a bond of social union, an incentive too noble daring, and salt to purify the heart from its grosser tendencies, preserving it from all that is mean, selfish and contemptible.Our present Queen, like all other British Monarchs over many centuries, has also sworn these Oaths. The Statute for Settling the Coronation Oath was passed by Parliament at the beginning of the reign of William and Mary, over three hundred years ago. The Coronation Oath Act of 1688 made it law the Westminster Confession of Faith of 1646, an act of the British Parliament, defines it’s meaning in section 22.
King George III set the standard for the value, solemnity and lasting application of all Oaths, when he said:
"Where is the power on earth to absolve me from the observance of every sentence of that Oath, particularly the one requiring me to maintain the Protestant Reformed Religion”.
"Was not my family seated on the Throne for that express purpose, and shall I be the first to suffer it to be undermined, perhaps overturned? No, No, I had rather beg my bread from door to door throughout Europe, than consent to any such measure.”
"I can give up my crown and retire from power. I can quit my palace and live in a cottage. I can lay my head on a block and lose my life, but I cannot break my oath. "If I violate that oath I am no longer legal sovereign in this country."
In the same way, if a Parliamentarian violates his sworn Oath, he is no longer a legal member of Parliament. We owe it to our Queen and to ourselves and our children and grandchildren to hold our members of Parliament, judiciary and all agents of the crown to their Oaths of true Allegiance. Otherwise, their true allegiance is no longer to the Queen , Canada, nor to the people of Canada, but to some powerful foreign commercial masters in the United Nations who demand illicit allegiance with threats of Treaties and International Law.
Such disloyal Parliamentarians and judiciary are happy to take us from under the Common Law protection of the Christian Monarchy, and put us into slavery under the non-Christian United Nations.
The unwritten rule of the court in separating itself as truly allegiant to the Queen and from God as Supreme is like saying true justice flies with only one wing and it has the self ordained right to sever her majesty in two! The Biblical priest Melchizadek, the arch type, demonstratedthat true justice imparts both aspects of rule, Church and state.
The court in attempting to use the quote “Give unto Caesar that which is Caesars” would by intent, compare a Roman pagan God to the Christian defender of the faith, this again is sac religious, blasphemic and contemptuous of her majesty’s court. Roman’s 13 is of the fact that Gods judges were ministers of God. Any minister of God when asked if they recognized the supremacy of God would loudly and proudly proclaim yes! .
All receiving this notice, are to take note of the prime reasons and my intent as a minister of God in asking the private men and women acting as agents of the crown, being lawyers judges justices and masters etc. of this province, or elsewhere I may come before them, is to demand their acknowledgment of their allegiance to the Queen as defender of the faith when asked, with intent of proud defense of the royal law that is in every court room in Canada by royal letters patent, and in acting out my faith in God as supreme. My intent is to ensure true justice transpires to be fair and integral as in God’s law. This also being written recorded and accepted as true service by the clerk of parliament and recorded as being the intent of the parliament via the preamble to the Canadian Constitution Acts of 1981 and two and supported by section 32 of that act stating that the charter of rights and freedoms as the supreme law of Canada only applies to the government as defined in section 118 of the criminal code and the interpretation act . All those that wish to classify themselves as government, federal and provincial or members of the Canadian body corporate and debt, in all of their authority of man’s law may do so. As the Queen was given advise and consent by the Lords spiritual and she cannot commit blasphemy in stating mans law is superior to God’s. The preamble and the royal law is the law for the people not of the classification as government or members of the body corporate known as Canada. The Canadian federal and provincial governments law is section 1-60.
The coronation oath of 1953 established for all men and women of a competent capacity becoming or already members of the Bar, that the Queen is a Christian monarch bound to uphold the laws of God and that all who become allegiant to her are in recognition of the royal law as supreme and of it’s author’s supremacy. The court or any agent of her majesty when failing to acknowledge it has an oath of allegiance to the defender of the faith and recognition of the supremacy of God relieves itself from sworn duty and reverts itself to a private man or woman with no more judicial authority than the sovereign inheritance of birth.
Unfortunately for those truthful brave souls that confront the appearance of a court with these ultimatum queries, the appearance of court is still in a position of usurped, unauthorized by the Queen, power, to commit further treason by partaking in a conspiracy to overthrow her majesty’s government under God and offering threats of violence enforced with guns to any who ask the questions of the court as to it’s capacity and true authority to convene and establish jurisdiction.
My intent is to verbally and spiritually convey to the semblance of a court in Canada or abroad, and establish in front of witnesses of good record, the purpose of the judicial system is to impart justice under the guard and watchful eye in defense of the faith, of her majesty Queen Elizabeth the second of England. It is necessary and sanctioned by my faith and duty as a minister of God to display my intent is, as her majesty’s style, to preserve the judicial good name of God and the continued convention of his integrity, whose hallowed halls of justice must maintain to keep the reputation and validity of the of the Canadian courts Authority in check.
Please, in a display of good faith and understanding of true allegiance , by way of reply, acknowledge understanding and receipt of this notice and any rebuttal by affidavit to a failure on my part to establish the truth and primarily my intent before the court! I am not a member entity or person of the body corporate known as Canada. I am a man under Gods rule and no other. I cannot, of faith and duty to God, recognize the de facto fiction person of a court attempting to operate without acknowledging their allegiance to the Queen and the recognition of it’s the corporate supreme law. Gods royal rule of law is as proclaimed in her majesty’s royal law the King James Bible..
I proclaim this without any reservation or contempt forher Majesty’s court, convened under God, as I am a minister of God of declared faith being Christian.Since her majesty is the anointed Christian monarch standing in defense of the faith and her majesty proudly administers such defense being the foundation of the court, a court bonafide bearing sanctioned jurisdiction sanctioned by her own oath, clearly does not exist unless it has an understood oath!!!.
Asking Questions of the court is religiously and lawfully mandatory to establish in official performance of a function of my calling in my faith to ensure that competent Authorised jurisdiction of the court exists. Contempt is committed by the man or woman acting as the court or an officer of the court in failing to provide in signature or verbal an oath of true allegiance or recognition of God and his law as being Supreme.
It is in the intent of my declaration and authoritative questions put to the court to make clear to all, by the courts answers, or lack of them, a knowledge and comprehension of the structure of the courts authority. As it has been witnessed, that the semblance of her majesty’s courts, presided over by these gentlemen imposters, has consistently without reason or explanation refused to acknowledge the courts royal allegiance by their lack of a positive response to the question “Does this court bear an oath of allegiance to her majesty the Queen defender of the faith?” In complication of it’s own error the court further fails to acknowledge and recognize the supremacy of God. In an arrogant display and denial of royal true allegiance to defender of the faith and the supremacy of God, that established, implemented, and oversee’s the Canadian courts authority, both justices have tacitly declared they have no allegiance to her majesty and possess no jurisdiction in the matter and all such orders or decisions rendered by them are void ab initio.
When a non allegiant man or woman, to the Monarch of Canada of Christian heritage, posing as a justice, judge, master, or officer of the court, in form of court of her majesty’s authority, proceeds against you when there is no damaged party ,without your permission, with force, guns, and punitive measures, that is treason!!! The unauthorized court has declared war upon the people using the Queen as their Champion. The release of a positive answer by the court to the test of integrity ,offered by the appellants would establish jurisdiction and the court would relieve all parties of confusion caused by the action of perceived treason on the part of the court against the people.
I intend no contempt for court as I as a minister hold God as supreme and as I in defense of the faith and belief hold God as supreme and having and holding faith in my spiritual father as God and as the founder of the court I cannot be in contempt. Those that choose to flagrantly disregard their oaths of true allegiance vesting authority of the court established under her majesty with God as supreme are the ones in contempt. Treason is to threaten with violent force in attempting to usurp the royal power using the appearance of the Queens authority when it is not in the possession of the one using the force of violent nature. It is my intent to convey that threatening the people or those who asks such legitimate questions of the courts jurisdiction, authority or legitimacy in a matter, with contempt of court for asking those questions as I , the deponent was, with being a guest of her majesty in jail is wrong. Justice McClung committed this observed act of treason upon myself in court room 515 April 4th 2001 A.D. at 9:35A.M.in response to asking the questions of allegiance and recognition of the Supreme law . In receiving no reply in acknowledgment of jurisdiction I then correctly assumed the court had no jurisdiction, was a private party attempting to contract with me, which I in defense of the faith and the people I stand for declined to accept in front of witnesses who have filed affidavits of testimony and witness to this action of treason.
I thank you for your sincerity in acknowledging and recognizing my faith, is in God as supreme
Minister of God Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
16 Any violation of My ecclesiastical copyright(s), or making a legal determination for Me, representing Me,
or communicating with Me in any manner not "under penalty of perjury" would constitute an agreement to the fee of;
a) Twenty Five thousand dollars ($25,000.00), minimum; or
b) one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) if violated for the purpose of profit/gain; or
c) ten million dollars ($10,000,000.00) if violated for the purpose of profit or gain more than three (3) times within a year,
for each and every violation, payable only in lawful money, and further,
17 I am the ecclesiastically authorized holder of the name Edward-Jay-Robin: Belanger
in its entirety, and further,
18 Any violation as described in paragraph 16 above, constitutes an agreement that I shall
seek relief from all of the private men and women acting as corporate officers and directors as well as any parent corporation(s), and
its officers and directors, jointly, severally, and personally, and further,
19 According to the law, there is no such thing as a drivers license required to execute duties as proclaimed in 176 of the criminal code, as an ecclesiastic officially performing his functions of calling is not bound by civil law unless registered and submitted into the commercial registry with knowledge of the effect of such registry.. Supreme Court of Canada