Hyper-inflation and exchange inflexibility will collapse global growth.
Allen 7/15 (Patrick Allen, CNBC Senior News Editor, July 15, 2010, “World at Risk of Folding in on Itself: Deputy Doom”, http://www.cnbc.com/id/38255206, LS)
The global economy is at risk of folding in on itself unless policy makers face up to the threat of inflation and exchange rate inflexibility, according to Arun Motianey, director of fixed income strategy at Roubini Global Economics. A Japan-like outcome is a big risk for the developed world with deflation a big danger, he said. Recent figures show that the recovery is sputtering in the US while China's booming growth has slowed down slightly, as Beijing unwinds stimulus measures. The Bank of Japan revised upwards is economic forecast but reiterated it will maintain its easy money policy. In his new book "SuperCycles" Motianey says the world has managed to recover from a number of shocks since the Latin American debt crisis, but getting over the financial crisis will be much harder. "The global rebalancing mechanism through flexible exchange rates is not working as well as it should," Motianey said. "Many emerging markets are resisting changes in nominal exchange rates. Higher inflation is causing some correction in real terms but it is too little and may turn out to be too late," he added.
Low – deflation
Depression coming. Declining production risks deflation.
The Philadelphia Inquirer Business 7/16 (The Philadelphia Inquirer Business, July 16, 2010, “A drop in manufacturing growth heightens economic worries”, http://www.philly.com/inquirer/business/20100716_A_drop_in_manufacturing_growth_heightens_economic_worries.html, LS)
After driving the economic recovery over the last year, manufacturing activity is slowing, according to reports Thursday in Philadelphia and New York.
A third report showed that factory production fell the most in a year, and yet another economic indicator - prices at the wholesale level - raised some worry about deflation. "Manufacturing has peaked, and factory output will moderate over the next few months," Ryan Sweet, senior economist at Moody's Economy.com in West Chester.In the Philadelphia area, manufacturing fell in July for the second consecutive month as the national economy stumbles through a soft patch, according to a monthly survey from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.The 5.1 index reading for this month indicated that the manufacturing sector was still growing, but slowly. Any index level above zero reflects growth in the sector, while a reading below zero signals contraction. But the July number was down from 8.0 in June and 21.4 in May.Moreover, the Fed said the index component for new orders fell below zero for the first time in a year, and shipments fell sharply.Looking ahead over the next six months, manufacturers in the region continued to expect business to grow. But, the Fed cautioned, "optimism has waned notably in recent months."The Philadelphia region consists of the eastern two-thirds of Pennsylvania, the southern half of New Jersey, and all of Delaware.The results in Philadelphia corroborated a similar survey by the New York Fed, also released Thursday, that showed factories in that region expanded in July at the slowest pace this year.Here are details of Thursday's other reports:Factory production. June's decline in output, also reported by the Federal Reserve, was the first in four months. Overall industrial production ticked up 0.1 percent for the month, but that was mainly the result of hot weather that increased demand for electricity from utilities. Factory output - the largest component of industrial production - dropped 0.4 percent.Production of automobiles, home-building materials, and processed food all fell in June.Prices. The Labor Department said wholesale prices fell 0.5 percent in June, the third straight monthly drop. Prices were pulled down by a drop in energy costs and the biggest plunge in food costs in eight years. The report raised new concerns about the possibility of deflation, a prolonged period of falling prices, which has not been seen in the United States since the Great Depression of the 1930s.
Recession remains. Fundamentals of growth are low.
Cooley and Rupert 7/16 (Thomas F. Cooley, professor of economics, and Peter Rupert, professor of economics, 7/16/10, “The Troubled Recovery”, http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/15/recovery-jobs-unemployment-opinions-columnists-thomas-f-cooley-peter-rupert.html?boxes=opinionschannellatest, LS)
Still-high unemployment indicates the recession is hardly over. On several occasions in this column we have chronicled the path of the latest economic cycle--showing that the "Great Recession" was (or is?) certainly that. After several months ofrelative optimism about the economic recovery, popular sentiment has recently ebbed. There is very good reason for that. Figure 1 shows the path of the current employment-to-population ratio compared with the previous four recessions. The decline in this ratio has been much deeper than any recession in the past 40 years and still shows little signs of improvement. In fact, after increasing five months in a row, the employment-to-population ratio dipped again in May and June, indicating the labor market is still on shaky ground. Though some optimists, such as Robert Gordon and Mark Zandi have declared the recession over, it sure won't feel like it's over until more people are back at work.Our "official" business cycle dating committee, housed at the National Bureau of Economic Research and of which Robert Gordon is a member, will, at some point, back-date the end of the recession. However, the committee mentioned that the 1.2 million drop in payroll employment was the biggest factor in determining the start of the contraction. So one might conclude that they would also put some amount of weight on the employment numbers to determine when we have exited the recession. From the looks of the recent performance of the employment to population ratio, that won't be soon.In addition, the most recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey, plotted in Figure 2, shows that there were small declines in the number of hires and job openings in May.Further, the Conference Board's Help Wanted OnLine release on June 30 showed that online advertised vacancies were little changed in June after declining slightly in May. The release shows that for the U.S. as a whole, there were 3.62 persons unemployed for each advertised vacancy (see Figure 3). "While all states have experienced some positive upturn in labor demand," the release says, "states that were heavily impacted by the housing market downturn, in general, are rebounding more slowly. Also, occupations that are most closely associated with real estate--construction, architecture and engineering, and legal--have been slower to advertise for additional workers while the labor demand in other occupations such as sales, entertainment, food preparation, and health care and personal care have already risen to pre-ecession levels." In other words, the report links the woes in the labor market to those in the housing market. If indeed there is any credence to this relationship, it does not bode well for the labor market recovering soon, especially for places like California that have about five unemployed individuals for each advertised vacancy. As many have pointed out, due to the massive "shadow inventory" of houses, the housing sector may still be a long way from recovery because the shadow inventory will take some time (up to three years by some estimates) to unwind. So, why aren't firms hiring? Output per hour is high; the productivity of those still in the labor force actually never fell during this recession as seen in Figure 4. Of course this just means that hours have fallen substantially more than output. Nevertheless, as mentioned in an earlier column, businesses are sitting on large amounts of cash; so, with productivity high and cash on hand, it seems like a ripe opportunity to begin to hire labor and expand. The point of that earlier column was that economic policy uncertainty might be holding back firm investment until there is some resolution as to just how much such policies will cost both small and large businesses. Many businesses claim they are not investing because there is not sufficient demand to warrant it.Retail sales confirm this having fallen in both May and June. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce household personal saving as measured by the Flow of Funds Account has also increased sharply over the last two quarters suggesting that households are also sitting on the sidelines. Neither businesses nor consumers seem to have a lot of confidence in this recovery. It seems highly unlikely in the current political climate that the government is going step in and fill the void. That suggests to us that it is worth thinking more deeply about the source of the pessimism.