Name Date a historical Context



Download 181.76 Kb.
Page7/8
Date06.04.2021
Size181.76 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8
Document 10

Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine (1904)

It is not true that the United States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects as regards the other nations of the Western Hemisphere save such as are for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see the neighboring countries stable, orderly and prosperous....Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention...[and] force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an internal police power.



  1. According to The Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, when should the United States intervene in other countries in the Western Hemisphere (2 reasons)?

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

  1. What kind of a power will the United States be in the Western Hemisphere?

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Document 11
March of the Flag” by Albert Beveridge (US Senator)

Hawaii is ours; Puerto Rico is to be ours; at the prayer of her people Cuba finally will be ours; in the islands of the East, even to the gates of Asia, coaling stations are to be ours at the very least; the flag of a liberal government is to float over the Philippines, and may it be the banner that Taylor unfurled in Texas and Fremont carried to the coast.

The Opposition tells us that we ought not to govern a people without their consent. I answer, The rule of liberty that all just government derives its authority from the consent of the governed, applies only to those who are capable of self-government We govern the Indians without their consent, we govern our territories without their consent, we govern our children without their consent. How do they know what our government would be without their consent? Would not the people of the Philippines prefer the just, humane, civilizing government of this Republic to the savage, bloody rule of pillage and extortion from which we have rescued them?

And, regardless of this formula of words made only for enlightened, self-governing people, do we owe no duty to the world? Shall we turn these peoples back to the reeking hands from which we have taken them? Shall we abandon them, with Germany, England, Japan, hungering for them? Shall we save them from those nations, to give them a self-rule of tragedy?



  1. According to Beveridge, in the second paragraph, why should the United States govern the Philippines without their consent? Provide one example he uses to support his claim.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Example: __________________________________________________________________________________________




Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page