Midterm #2 (100pts) Name:
Model comparison and general questions (20pts)

Assuming two firms have the same constant marginal cost, and some positive fixed cost, both firms produce a homogeneous product, and face a linear demand

Under what type of market structure is the market price the highest?
Monopoly or cartel
Bertrand, Stackelberg, Cournot
Rank Cournot, Stackelberg, and Bertrand by the total market output (from the highest to the lowest)
Cournot, Stackelberg, Bertrand
Rank Cournot, Stackelberg, and Bertrand by the total market profit (from the highest to the lowest)

What is the difference between Cournot and Bertrand
Cournot – firms compete on quantity, Bertrand – on price
Bertrand
Under what type of competition even with two firms the market price equals the perfectly competitive price?

How can you determine whether firms are in a collusive cartel agreement from the elasticity of demand?
Cartels price at monopoly price which is on the elastic part of the demand
No
If two out of three Cournot firms merge and the two resulting firms compete in Cournot fashion. Will the profits of the merged firm exceed the total premerger profits of the two merged firms? Assume that each firm still has to incur its own fixed cost, marginal cost is constant, and the demand is linear.
A
Two identical firms A and B compete in Cournot fashion. Which firm’s reaction function is shown below
Q_{A}
Cournot profits
What is the highest profit that a Stackelberg leader can make if it cannot credibly commit to quantity (and neither can the follower)
Q_{B}
Cournot (#220pts, #35pts)
Q_{A}=18Q_{B}P
Setup: the demand is given by .There are two firms: A and B. The cost of each firm is given by. The firms compete in Cournot fashion by simultaneously choosing quantity

Write firm A’s residual demand
Some answers had the demand written as a function of both quantities – partial credit.
Q_{B}=60.5Q_{A}
Write firm B’s reaction function
Technically reaction function has to be of the form Q_{B}=…Q_{A}... many answers just wrote the right side of the equation. I did not take points away for this
4
Find firm A’s quantity
4

Find firm B’s quantity

(+) Continuing with the previous setup. Can firm B increase profits through investment that would double its (fixed cost) but lower marginal cost by half?
Yes because the profit will increase to 20 from 8.
With the new cost _{ }the reaction function becomes . The quantities of B and A are respectively 6 and 3. The price becomes 9.

A common mistake here was to assume that both firms A and B will increase the fixed cost and have lower marginal cost. If the rest of the solution was correct it resulted in a minimal reduction.
Stackelberg (#420pts, #5pts)

Setup: the demand is given by There are two firms. The cost of each firm is given by The firms compete in Stackelberg fashion by sequentially choosing quantity.
Q_{L}=404P
Find leader’s residual demand after the leader takes into account follower’s quantity

Present this game in extensive form and show how to find an equilibrium of this game by adding arrows
Firm 1
Firm 2
Firm 2
_159_, 0
_78__, _37.5__
Q=0
Q_{Follower}=9
69, 69
_87__, _64.5__
Q_{Cournot}=12
Q_{Follower}=9
Q_{Cournot}=12
Q_{Leader}=
Wrong profits without calculation were not credited. I did my best to trace the mistakes.

(+)Continuing with the previous setup, can the leader prevent entry by producing 20 units? Show calculations.
No, the follower will make profit of 29.

Follower’s reaction function is , the leader demand after follower enters is then , leader’s MR is then . Setting it equal to the marginal cost leader will produce 9x2=18, the follower reacts with 9. The price is then P=190.5(9+18)=5.5.
Yes, or no without calculations were not credited but even a wrong answer received partial credit if the calculations were correct and the wrong answer resulted from an arithmetic mistake.
Bertrand (5pts)
P= 2 Q= 5
Setup: the demand is given by . There are two firms. The cost of each firm is given by . The firms compete in Bertrand fashion by simultaneously choosing price

Find Bertrand equilibrium price and quantity

On the graph below, explain why your answer to the previous question is not an equilibrium if producers are capacity constrained. Assume each firm has capacity that equals half of the Bertrand quantity. (notice this question is not asking to prove that the equilibrium does not exist)
Game theory (#75pts, #815pts)

Find all Nash equibria of the following game or show that none exist


Player 2

A

B

Player 1

A

1, 2

3,3

B

2,1

10,0

{B,A}

The demand is given by .There are two firms: A and B. The cost of each firm is given by. Setup the collusion game as a prisoner’s dilemma game. Assume that when both firms collude they produce monopoly output and split the profits; when both firms compete they revert to Cournot equilibrium; when one firm colludes and the other competes the colluding firm still produces half of monopoly output and the competing firm produces its best response quantity.


Firm 2

Collude, Q=3

Compete

Firm 1

Collude, Q=3

_10__, _10__

_7__, _12__

Compete

_12__, __7_

_8__, _8__


Which set of strategies represents the best outcome for both firms? Is it also the best choice?
{Collude, collude}, not the best choice

Find Nash equilibrium of the game by showing arrows
Solving for monopoly price and quantity we get P=12, Q=6. When each firm produces half Q_{A}=Q_{B}=3, so that the profits of each firm are 12x36x38=10.
In on
A common mistake was to fill in quantities instead of payoffs. This is a big mistake because it shows that the student thinks that the firms are maximizing quantity, not profits.
Another common mistake was not to subtract the fixed cost for each of the participants in the cartel. The collusive profits were then 14, not 10. Resulted in a deduction.
Reading and discussion questions (15pts)

Orbitz reimburses customers for the difference in price if another customer books the same hotel at a lower price. How can this behavior lead to collusion?
Orbitz is less likely to reduce price because it is now more costly.
The key to this question was to realize that it is Orbitz committing to high price, not the other firms.

Why do firms need to announce price increases if they are in a collusive agreement?
Because the firm that increases price unilaterally would lose revenues. Announcements are necessary to allow other firms to follow or rescind the increase otherwise.

Give 3 reasons for price wars
Deflation,
Differential rates of growth (ebooks vs regular)
New entrant
Decrease in the demand

What is a “network industry”? Give an example
Consumers’ utility increases in the number of users in a network industry. Examples: Zip drive, Windows operating system

When can a firm gain advantage by increasing everyone’s cost?
When it can produce at a lower marginal cost or when it has incurred the sunk cost

What is the difference between predatory pricing and limit pricing?
Predatory pricing: pricing below MC to drive out competition
Limit pricing: producing a quantity that would prevent entry (deteriorate entrant’s profits)
Notes: 1. (+) denotes scrumptious questions; 2. questions requiring an explanation will not be credited without one.
Share with your friends: 