Anima and interpretation. The main point I wish to stress here is that working with the anima, in any cultural setting, is an interpretive process. The anima must be involved in some form of cycle of meaning that integrates knowledge -- often social ways of knowing -- with the individual’s direct experiences. Most traditional cultures will provide an interpretive context within which anima imagery and affect will make sense within the context of their system of local knowledge.
It is very unlikely that such systems will interpret anima-like experiences as psychodynamic. Rather, they will tend to be interpreted in terms of visitation by spirits, goddesses or demons, depending upon whether they are affectively positive or negative. Anima possession may be viewed as soul-loss, or possession by some spirit for the purpose of healing or killing (Prince 1968, Bourguignon 1976, Boddy 1994). If they are considered bothersome, sometimes anima states may be seen as being due to witchcraft or sorcery. The positive aspect of anima manifestation my involve interpretations of “divine intervention” when manifestations include intuitive inspiration – the word “inspiration” being used advisedly here, for it originally meant the divine breathing wisdom into one. Intuition in many cultures is considered intervention from the external domain of spirit, rather than as in internal and largely unconscious function of the psyche.
It is very important from the anthropological point of view to understand that a “Jungian” hermeneutic is just as culturally loaded as any other. It is the purpose to which the interpretation is put that matters. From the standpoint of individuation, the Jungian approach will probably carry one to higher states of maturity than will traditional cycles of meaning. The latter are normally more concerned with social integration of meaning than with aiding the individual to optimize his or her own individuation.
As an anthropologist, I have come down heavily upon the essentially hermeneutic aspect of the process of individuation. I am inclined to do so by the ignorance of cross-cultural factors often found in the Jungian literature today. During the years that I worked with meditators of all kinds and cultural backgrounds, I was impressed with the extent to which people can uncritically accept the interpretations most amenable to their cultural backgrounds. To my reading at least, the failure to take into consideration the relativity of interpretation is antithetical to what Jung intended or taught us.
References Ader, R. ed. (1980) Psychoneuroimmunology. New York: Academic Press.
D’Aquili, Eugene G. and Andrew B. Newberg (1999) The Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experience. New York: Fortress.
Argüelles, J. and M. Argüelles (1972) Mandala. Berkeley: Shambala.
Barfield, Thomas (1997) the Dictionary of Anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Beebe, John (1984) “The Father’s Anima as a Clinical and as a Symbolic Problem.” Journal of Analytic Psychology 29:277-287.
Beyer, S. (1973) The Cult of Tara. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Boddy, Janice (1994) “Spirit Possession Revisited: Beyond Instrumentality.” Annual Review of Anthropology 23:407‑434.
Bourguignon, Erika (1976) Possession. San Francisco: Chandler and Sharp.
Brunner, Cornelia (1986 ) Anima As Fate. Dallas, TX: Spring Publications.
Butterworth, G. and L. Grover (1988) “The Origins of Referential Communication in Human Infancy.” in Thought Without Language, L. Weiskrantz, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Collins, Alfred (1994) Fatherson: A Self Psychology of the Archetypal Masculine. Wilmette, IL: Chiron.
Colman, Warren (1996) “Aspects of Anima and Animus in Oedipal Development.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 41:37-57.
Devereux, Paul (1992) Symbolic Landscapes. Sumerset, England: Gothic Image Publications.
_____ (1996) Re‑Visioning the Earth. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Farella, J.R. (1984) The Main Stalk: A Synthesis of Navajo Philosophy. Tucson, AR: University of Arizona Press.
Field, T.M. (1985) “Neonatal Perception of People: Maturation and Individual Differences.” in Social Perception in Infants, T.M. Field and N.A. Fox, eds. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
Griffin, David Ray (1989) "Introduction." in Archetypal Process: Self and Divine in Whitehead, Jung and Hillman. Ed. by David Ray Griffin. Evanston, IL: Northeastern University Press, pp. 1-76.
Griffin-Pierce, Trudy (1992) Earth Is My Mother, Sky Is My Father: Space, Time, and Astronomy in Navajo Sandpainting. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Hillman, James (1985) Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account. Dallas, TX: Spring Publications.
_____ (1989) “The Poetic Basis of Mind.” in A Blue Fire: Selected Writings by James Hillman, edited by Thomas Moore. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 15-35.
Hopcke, Robert H. (1989) A Guided Tour of the Collected Works of C.G. Jung. Boston: Shambhala.
Jung, C.G. (1956 [orig. pub. 1912, revised in 1952]) Symbols of Transformation: An Analysis of the Prelude to a Case of Schizophrenia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (Collected Works No. 5).
_____ (1959 ) Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (Collected Works No. 9, Part 2).
_____ (1965 ) Memories, Dreams, Reflections. New York: Vintage Books.
_____ (1966 [orig. pub. 1943/1928]) Two Essays on Analytical Psychology (Second Edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
_____ (1968a ) The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (Collected Works No. 9, Part 1).
_____ (1968b [orig. pub. 1944, revised 1958]) Psychology and Alchemy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, (Collected Works No. 12).
_____ (1970 [orig. pub. 1955/56]) Mysterium Coniunctionis: An Inquiry into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (Collected Works No. 14).
_____ (1972 ) Mandala Symbolism (First Princeton/Bollingen paperback edition). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
_____ (1997 [1930-1934]) Visions: Notes on the Seminar Given in 1930-1934 By C.G. Jung. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Karaban, Roslyn A. (1992) “Jung’s Concept of the Anima/Animus: Enlightening or Frightening?” Pastoral Psychology 41(1):39-44.
Laughlin, Charles D.(1985) "On the Spirit of the Gift." Anthropologica 27 (1‑2): 137‑159.
_____ (1990) "Womb=Woman=World: Gender and Transcendence in Tibetan Tantric Buddhism". Pre‑ and Perinatal Psychology Journal 5(2): 147‑165.
_____ (1991) "Pre‑ and Perinatal Brain Development and Enculturation: A Biogenetic Structural Approach." Human Nature 2(3): 171‑213.
_____ (1993) "Fuzziness and Phenomenology in Ethnological Research: Insights from Fuzzy Set Theory." Journal of Anthropological Research 49(1):17‑37.
_____ (1994) "Psychic Energy and Transpersonal Experience: A Biogenetic Structural Account of the Tibetan Dumo Practice," in Being Changed by Cross‑cultural Encounters: The Anthropology of Extraordinary Experiences (ed. by D.E. Young and J.‑G. Goulet). Peterborough: Broadview Press, pp. 99-134.
_____ (1996a) "Archetypes, Neurognosis and the Quantum Sea." Journal of Scientific Exploration 10(3):375‑400.
_____ (1996b) “The Properties of Neurognosis.” Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 19(4):363-380.
_____ (1997) "The Cycle of Meaning: Some Methodological Implications of Biogenetic Structural Theory." in Anthropology of Religion: Handbook of Theory and Method (ed. by Stephen Glazier). Greenwood Press, Pp. 471‑488.
Laughlin, Charles D., John McManus and Mark Webber (1985) "Neurognosis, Individuation and Tibetan Arising Yoga Practice." Phoenix: The Journal of Transpersonal Anthropology 8 (½): 91‑106.
Laughlin, Charles D. and John McManus (1995) “The Relevance of the Radical Empiricism of William James to the Anthropology of Consciousness” Anthropology of Consciousness 6(3):34‑56.
Laughlin, Charles D., John McManus and Eugene G. d'Aquili (1990) Brain, Symbol and Experience: Toward a Neurophenomenology of Consciousness. New York: Columbia University Press.
Laughlin, Charles D. and C. Jason Throop (1999) “Emotion: A View from Biogenetic Structuralism.” in Biocultural Approaches to the Emotions (ed. By A.L. Hinton). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 329‑363.
_____ (2001) “Imagination and Reality: On the Relations Between Myth, Consciousness, and the Quantum Sea.” Zygon (in press).
Levy‑Bruhl, Lucien (1923) Primitive Mentality (1966 edition). Boston: Beacon Press.
MacDonald, George F., John Cove, Charles D. Laughlin and John McManus (1988) "Mirrors, Portals and Multiple Realities." Zygon 23 (4):39‑64.
Maidenbaum, Aryeh (1998) “Dreams and Other Aspects of Jungian Psychology.” in Current Theories of Psychoanalysis, ed. by Robert Langs. New York: International Universities Press.
Matthews, Washington (1994 ) Navajo Legends. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press.
Meier, C.A. (1995) Personality: The Individuation Process in Light of C.G. Jung’s Typology. Einsiedeln, Switzerland: Daimon.
Murray, L. and C. Trevarthen (1985) “Emotional Regulation of Interactions Between Two-Month-Olds and Their Mothers.” in Social Perception in Infants, T.M. Field and N.A. Fox, eds. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
Ortiz, Alfonso (1972) “Ritual Drama and the Pueblo World View.” in New Perspectives on the Pueblos, ed. Alfonso Ortiz. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 135-161.
Prince, D., ed. (1968) Trance and Possession States. Proceedings of the D.M. Burke Memorial Society, March, 1966. Montreal: Electra Publications
Schwartz-Salant, Nathan (1998) The Mystery of Human Relationship: Alchemy and the Transformation of the Self. London: Routledge.
Schwarz, Maureeen Trudelle (1997) Molding in the Image of Changing Woman: Navajo views on the Human Body and Personhood. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Stein, Murray (1998) Jung’s Map of the Soul: An Introduction. Chicago: Open Court.
Steinberg, Warren (1993) Masculinity: Identity, Conflict, and Transformation. Boston: Shambhala.
Tiberia, Vincenza A. (1977) “The Feminine Component of the Masculine Psyche As Anima Projection.” International Journal of Symbology 8(1):1-16.
Throop, C. Jason and Charles D. Laughlin (2002) “Ritual, Collective Effervescence and the Categories: Toward a neo-Durkheimian Model of the Naturte of Human Consciousness, Feeling and Understanding.” Journal of Ritual Studies 16(1):40-63.
Ulanov, Ann and Barry Ulanov (1994) Transforming Sexuality: The Archetypal World of Anima and Animus. Boston: Shambhala.
Wallace, Anthony F.C. (1966) Religion: An Anthropological View. New York: Random House.