Grading: Please see the rubrics below.
***Make sure to read the rubric’s before you begin and while you are revising.
Breakdown:
Teacher assessment- 80% of mark
Self-assessment- 10% of mark
Peer assessment- 10% of mark
PLO focus/ Objectives:
Select and summarize information from primary and secondary print and non-print sources, including electronic sources
Plan, revise, and deliver formal oral and written presentations
Analyse roots of present-day regional, cultural, and social issues
Evaluate the effects of the industrial revolution on society
ELA Objective:
A5- Select and use a range of strategies to prepare oral communications, including; interpreting a task and setting a purpose, considering audience, generating ideas, making connections among relevant knowledge and experiences, planning and rehearsing presentations.
|
Teacher Assessment: Worth 80%
TOPIC: ____________________________________________
GROUP MEMBERS: _________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
CRITERIA
|
5 MARKS
|
4 MARKS
|
3 MARKS
|
1-2 MARKS
|
VISUALS
|
Visuals are clear and easy to follow. The visuals add to the audiences understanding of the issue. The visuals are referred to during the presentation.
|
Visuals are clear and easy to follow. The visuals add to the audiences understanding of the issue. The visuals are not referred to sufficiently during the presentation.
|
Visuals are clear. The visuals add to the audiences understanding of the issue. The visuals are not referred to during the presentation.
|
Visuals may not be clear. The do not add to the audiences understanding of the issue.
|
ORAL REPORT
|
Within the given time limit. All members participated. No reading off notes. Clear voice and projection.
|
Within the given time limit. All members participated. Some reading off notes. Voices and projection may be hard to hear.
|
Over or under the given time limit by less than one minute. All members participated. Some reading off notes. Voices and projection may be hard to hear.
|
Over or under the given time limit. Not all members participated. Reading off notes. Voices and projection may be hard to hear.
|
GROUP WORK
|
Share in research. Share in presentation. Share in organizations/preparation. Well research.
|
Mostly shared research, presentation, organization and preparation. Showed sufficient research.
|
Some students took on more work than other students. Showed sufficient research
|
Unequal share of research. Unequal share in presentation. Unequal share in organizations/ preparation. Did not show sufficient research
|
ISSUE
|
Students identify and clarify the issue. Have a strong thesis statement. Show and analyze main arguments. Students relate their argument to modern-day
|
Students identify and clarify the issue. Have a thesis statement. Show main arguments. Students relate their argument to modern-day
|
Students identify and clarify the issue. Lack a thesis statement. Show main arguments. Make weak connections to modern-day
|
Students somewhat identify and clarify the issue. Lack a thesis statement. Show main arguments. Make no connections to modern-day
|
Peer Assessment: Worth 10%
TOPIC__________________________________
GROUP TITLE____________________________
CRITRIA
|
Yes, very much so.
|
Yes, to some extent.
|
Yes but very little.
|
No not at all.
|
Organization: clearly identifies and clarifies the issue early in the presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
Clear and orderly development of arguments throughout presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
Interest: presenters speak comfortably and seemed at ease.
|
|
|
|
|
Presenters effectively used class members in presentation, you felt that they directed their presentation to you
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE CIRCLE ONE:
Self-Assessment: Worth 10%
NAME: ______________________________________________
BLOCK: _____________________________________________
TOPIC/ GROUP NAME: _________________________________
PLEASE ANSWER AS HONEST AS POSSIBLE!
Share with your friends: |