Literature Review on Domestic Violence Perpetrators urbis staff responsible for this report were



Download 165.46 Kb.
Page11/11
Date31.05.2016
Size165.46 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11

4.2Future research opportunities


Specific areas for future research identified in the literature include:

Strategies to recruit or engage domestic violence perpetrators who do not seek help or come into contact with the criminal justice system in intervention programs (e.g., Campbell, Neil, Jaffe & Kelly, 2010; Edleson, 2008) – given that previous convictions or criminal history is one of the strongest predictors of recidivism, it is critical for intervention programs to reach men early in the development of domestic and sexual violence. This finding suggest that there is a need to develop specific strategies to prevent reoffending among first-time offenders as well as strategies to better identify high risk offenders and increase their capacity to complete programs.

Strategies to minimise program attrition – research indicates that program attrition rates are high for both domestic and sexual violence offender intervention programs, program completers have better outcomes than non-completers (dropouts), and that those who drop out of programs can reoffend at a higher rate compared to those who did not participate in a program (e.g., Sartin et al., 2006).

Strategies to improve the capacity of intervention programs to cater for perpetrators of different socio-economic and cultural backgrounds, and geographic locations.

The development of reliable and valid screening and assessment tools to facilitate the matched intervention approach.

Cultural competence of intervention programs – new methodologies are needed to determine the cultural competence of programs.

The National Council to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children (NCRVWC, 2009) proposed the following areas for future research:

Effectiveness of incarceration, deterrence and community restraint in reducing recidivism.

Program characteristics that are effective in changing men’s behaviour.

Developing and evaluating best practice prison-based intervention programs – examining the principles and theory underpinning the program content, the approach used to work with female partners and managing safety issues, the capacity of the program to respond appropriately to perpetrators from a range of backgrounds and different geographical locations, and the impact of the program in reducing violence against women and their children

This paper reflects the conclusions drawn from the Australian and international literature. The final paper will include the findings from the survey of Australian intervention programs being undertaken as part of the overall project.

5References


ABS. (2005). Prisoners in Australia, 2005, Catalogue 4517.0. Canberra: ABS

ABS. (2006a). Personal Safety Australia, 2005, Catalogue 4906.0. Canberra: ABS

ABS. (2006b). Recorded Crime–Victims Australia, 2005, Catalogue 4510.0. Canberra: ABS

ABS. (2006c). Criminal Courts Australia, 2004-05, Catalogue 4513.0. Canberra: ABS

ABS. (2006d). Personal Safety Survey, 2006. Canberra: ABS (formerly, Women’s Safety Survey, 1996)

ABS. (2010). Recorded Crime–Victims Australia, 2009, Catalogue 4519.0. Canberra: ABS

ABS. (2011). Recorded Crime – Victims Australia, 2010, Catalogue 4513.0. Canberra: ABS 

Aldarondo, S. (2009). Assessing the efficacy of batterer intervention programs in context. Discussion paper presented at Batterer Intervention: Doing the work and measuring the progress. National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice and the Family Violence Prevention Fund.

Al-Yaman, F.,Van Doeland, M., & Wallis, M. (2006). Family violence amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Cat no.IHW17. Canberra: AIHW.

Ashcroft, J., Daniels, D. J., & Hart, S. V. (2003). Do batterer intervention programs work? Two studies. Research for Practice. Washington: Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.

Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work?: A metaanalytic reviewof domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.

Beech, A., Bourgon, G., Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Langton, C., Marques, J., Miner, M., Murphy, W., Quinsey, V., Seto, M., Thornton, D. & Yates, P. M. (2007). The Collaborative Outcome Data Committee's Guidelines for the Evaluation of Sexual Offender Treatment Outcome Research. Part 2: CODC Guidelines. The Collaborative Outcome Data Committee.

Belcher , L. (2008). A Critical Evaluation of the Sex Offender Treatment Programmes used in Prisons. Internet Journal of Criminology.

Blatch, C. & Delaney, J. (work in progress, 24 July, 2009). Literature revie of domestic violence perpetrator progarms. Program Support Unit, Community Offender Services, NSW Department of Corrective Services .

Bowen, E. (2010). Therapeutic Environment and Outcomes in a U.K. Domestic Violence Perpetrator Program. Small Group Research, 41, 198-220.

Brewin, C.R., Andrews, B. & Valentine, J.D. (2000). Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68 (5), 748-766.

Brown, T. & Hampson, R. (2009). An evaluation of interventions with domestic violence perpetrators. Melbourne: Department of Social Work, Monash Unviersity.

Byrne, C.A., Resnick, H.S., Kilpatrick, D.G., Best, C.L. & Saunders, B.E. (1999). The socio-economic impact of interpersonal violence on women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67 (3). 362-366.

Campbell, M., Neil, J. A., Jaffe, P. G., & Kelly, T. (2010). Engaging abusive men in seeking community intervention: a critical research & practice priority. Journal of Family Violence, 25(4), 413-422.

Carmody, M., Evans, S., Krogh, C., Flood, M., Heenan, M., & Ovenden, G. (2009). Framing best practice: National Standards for the primary prevention of sexual assault through education, National Sexual Assault Prevention Education Project for NASASV. University of Western Sydney, Australia.

Casey, S., Day, A., & Howells, K. (2005). The application of the transtheoretical model to offender populations: Some critical issues. Legal and Ciminological Psychology, 10, 1-15.

Chung, D., O’Leary, P. J., & Hand, T. (2006). Sexual violence offenders: Prevention and intervention approaches. Melbourne: ACSSA Issues no.5, Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, .

Chung, D., O'Leary, P., & Zannettino, L. (2004). Naitonal review of integrated programs for perpetrators of domestic violence. Canberra: Office for Status of Women, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

Cissner, A. B., & Puffett, N. K. (2006). Do batterer program length or approach affect completion or re-arrest rates? Retrieved from http://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/IDCC_DCAP%20final.pdf

Coulter, M., & VandeWeerd, C. (2009). Reducing domestic violence and other criminal recidivism: effectiveness of a multilevel batterers intervention program. Violence and Victims, 24(2), 139-152.

Day A, Chung D, O’Leary P, & Carson E. (2009). Programs for men who perpetrate domestic violence: an examination of the issues underlying the effectiveness of intervention programs. Journal of Family Violence, 24(3), 203-212.

Day, A., Jones, R., Nakata, M., & McDermott. D. (2011). Indigenous family violence: an attempt to understand the problems and inform appropriate and effective responses to criminal justice system intervention. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, iFirst article, 1–14.

Eckhardt, C. I., Murphy, C., Black, D., & Suhr, L. (2006). Intervention programs for perpetrators of intimate partner violence: conclusions from a clinical research perspective. Public Health Reports, 121(3), 369-381.

Edleson, J. (2008). Promising practices with men who batter : report to King County Domestic Violence Council.

Feder, L., Wilson, D. B., & Austin, S. (2008). Court-mandated interventions for individuals convicted of domestic violence: Campbell Collaboration Systematic Review, no. 12.

Fileborn, B. (2011). Sexual assault laws in Austraila (Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault Resource Sheet). Canberra: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

Gelb, K. (2007). Recidivism of sex offenders : research paper. Melbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council.

Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Evaluating batterer counselling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications. Aggression and violent behavior, 9, 605-631.

Gondolf, E. W. (2009). The survival of batterer programs? Responding to evidence-based practice and improving program operation. Retrieved from http://www.futureswithoutviolence.org/userfiles/file/Children_and_Families/The%20Survival%20of%20Batterer%20Programs.pdf

Gondolf, E. W. (2010). Lessons from a successful and failed random assignment testing batterer program innovations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(4), 355-376.

Greenfield, D.P. (2006). Organic Approaches to the Treatment of Paraphilics and Sex Offenders, Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 34,437-454.

Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A Meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865-891.

Hearn, J. (1995). Men's violence to known women. In N. Blacklock, Domestic violence: working with perpetrators, the community and its institutions. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 7, 65-72.

Heseltine, K., Sarre, R., & Day, A. (2011). Prison-based correctional rehabilitation: An overview of intensive interventions for moderate to high-risk offenders. Canberra: Trends and Issues In Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 412, Australian Institute of Criminology.

Holtzworth-Monroe, A., Meehan, J., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. (2001). Testing the Holtzworth-Monroe and Stuart (1994) battere typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 1000-1020.

Howells, K., Heseltine, K., Sarre, R., Davey, L. & Day, A. (2004). Correctional Offender Rehabilitation Programs: The National Picture in Australia. Forensic Psychology Research Group, Centre for Applied Psychological Research, University of South Australia.

Humphreys, C., Ross, S. & Diemer, K. (2010). Evaluation issues for Men's Behaviour Change Program. Departments fo Social Work and Criminology, University of Melbourne.

Jamieson, S. & Wendt, S. (2008). Exploring men's perpetrator programs in small rural communities, Rural Scoeity, 18 (1), 39-50.

Jewell, L.M., & Wormith, J. S. (2010). Variables associated with attrition from domestic violence treatment programs targeting male batterers: a meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(10), 1086-1113.

Johnson, H. (2005). Crime Victimisation in Australia: Key results of the 2004 International Crime Victimisation Survey. Australian Institute of Criminology.

Kingsnorth, R. (2006). Intimate partner violence: Predictors of recidivism in a sample of arrestees. Violence Against Women, 12(10), 917-935.

Labriola M, Rempel M, & Davis R. (2008). Do batterer programs reduce recidivism? Results from a randomized trial in the Bronx. Justice Quarterly, 25(2), 268-282.

Laing, L. (2000). Progress, trends and challenges in Australian responses to domestic violence. Sydney: Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse.

Lievore, D. (2004). Recidivism of sexual assault offenders: rates, risk factors and treatment efficacy. Canberra: Office of the Status of Women by the Australian Institute of Criminology.

Loxton, D., Hosking, S., Stewartwilliams, J., Brookes, J. & Byles, J. (2008). A review of selected domestic and family violence prevention programs. The Sax Institute, Univerity of Newcastle (for the NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet).

Macgregor, S. (2008). Sex offender treatment programs: effectiveness of prison and community based programs in Australia and New Zealand. Indigenous Justice Clearinghouse Research Brief, 3.

Maiuro, R. D. & Eberle, J. A. (2008). State standards for domestic violence perpetrator treatmetn: Current status, trends and recommendations, Violence and Victims, 23 (2), 133-155.

Marcus, G. & Braaf, R. (2007). Domestic and family violence studies, surveys and statistics: pointers to policy and practice. Sydney: Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse. http://www.austdvclearinghouse.unsw.edu.au/PDF%20files/Stakeholderpaper_1.pdf

Mouzos J. & Makkai, T. (2004). Women’s experiences of male violence: findings from the Australian component of the International Violence Against Women Survey (IVAWS), Research and Public Policy Series 56, Canberra: AIC.

Murphy, C. M., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2005). Treating the abusive partner: An individualised cognitive-behavioral approach. Clinical and Social Work Journal, 35(2), 143-144.

Murphy, C. M., & Meis, L. A. (2008). Individual Treatment of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators. Violence and Victims, 23(2), 173-186.

Murphy, W. D., & McGrath, R. (2008). Best Practices in Sex Offender Treatment. Prison Service Journal, 178, 3 - 9.

National Council to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children. (2009). Time for action: The National Council's Plan for Australia to reduce violence against women and their children: 2009-2021. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Offender Treatment Attrition and Its Relationship to Recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 6-21.

Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: They Duluth model. . New York: Springer.

Price, B. J., & Rosenbaum, A. (2009). Batterer intervention programs: a report from the field. Violence and Victims, 24(6), 757-770.

Proeve, M. (2010). Sexual behaviour clinic: A review and discussion paper. Dpeartment for Correctional Services, South Australia.

Rodwell, L., & Smith, N. (2008). An evaluation of the NSW domestic violence intervention court model. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime and Statistics Research.

Sartin, R. M., Hansen, D. J., & Huss, M. T. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: a review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 425-440.

Saunders, D. (1996). Feminist-cognitive-behavioural and proces-psychodynamic treatments for men who batter: Interactino of abuser traits and treatment models. Violence and Victims, 11, 393-414.

Saunders, D. G. (2008). Group Interventions for Men Who Batter: A Summary of Program Descriptions and Research. Violence and Victims, 23(2), 156-172.

Schmucker, M, & Losel, F. (2008). Does sexual offender treatment work? A systematic review of outcome evaluations. Psicotherma, 20(1), 10-19.

Schrock, D. P., & Padavic, I. (2007). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity in a batterer intervention program. Gender and Society, 21(5), 625-649.

Schweitzer, R., & Dwyer, J. (2003). Sex crime recidivism: Evaluation of a sexual offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 18(11), 1292-1310.

Smith, J. (2009). Literature Review: Overview of Research and Evaluation on Men’s Behaviour Change Programs. Melbourne: SAFER: Victorian Family Violence Reform Research Program, University of Melbourne.

Stover, C. S., Meadows, A. L., & Kaufman. J. (2009). Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence: Review and Implications for Evidence-Based Practice Professional Psychology-Research and Practice, 40(3), 223-233.

Urbis Keys Young. (2000). Evaluation of ACT Interagency Family Violence Intervention Program: Final Report. Sydney: Keys Young.

Urbis Keys Young. (2001). Evaluation fo the ACT Family Violence Intervention Program Phase II Sydney: Urbis Keys Young.

Urbis Keys Young. (2004). Evaluation of the NSW pilot program for perpetrators of domestic violence: final report. Sydney: Keys Young.

Witt, P. H., Greenfield, D. P., & Hiscox, S. P. (2008). Cognitive/behavioral approaches to the treatment of adult sex offeders, Journal fo Psychiatry & Law, 36, 245-269.

Woodrow, A. C., & Bright, D. A. (2011). Effectiveness of a Sex Offender Treatment Programme: A Risk Band Analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(1), 43 - 55.

Work with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence in Europe. (2008). Guidelines to develop standards for programs working with male perpetrators of domestic violence (version 1.1). The Dphne II Programme (2006-2008) to combat violence against children, young people and women. European Union.




Sydney
Level 21, 321 Kent Street
Sydney, NSW 2000
t +02 8233 9900
f +02 8233 9966

Brisbane
Level 12, 120 Edward Street
Brisbane, QLD 4000
t +07 3007 3800
f +07 3007 3811




Melbourne
Level 12, 120 Collins Street
Melbourne, VIC 3000
t +03 8663 4888
f +03 8663 4999

Perth
Level 1, 55 St Georges Terrace
Perth, WA 6000
t +08 9346 0500
f +08 9321 7790

Australia • Asia • Middle East
w urbis.com.au e info@urbis.com.au



1 These instruments collect data on violence in relation to the following discipline areas: crime and safety surveys (CSS), health and lifestyle surveys (HLS), and Indigenous specific surveys (ISS). More specifically, CSS include the ABS National Crime and Safety Survey, ABS Personal Safety Survey, International Violence Against Women Survey and the ABS Women’s Safety Survey. Health and lifestyle surveys include the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, and the National Drug Strategy Household Survey, and ISS are canvassed by ABS National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey (NATSISS) and the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey (NATSIHS)

2 For example, the ABS’s Recorded Crime Statistics (4509.0), the National Crime and Safety Survey, and the Women’s Safety Survey (1995), now the Personal Safety Survey (2005).

3 The more recent, Personal Safety Survey (2005) (ABS, 2006), did not report help seeking behaviours of victims/survivors. In this regard, the earlier Women’s Safety Survey (1995) (ABS, 1996) report is referenced to provide an indication of reporting tendencies of female victims/survivors.

4 With the exception of Western Australia for 2009.

5 There is evidence that previous victimisation is one of the strongest predictors of subsequent victimisation (e.g., Brewin, Andrews & Valentine, 2000; Byrne, Resnick, Kilpatrick, Best & Saunders, 1999). Findings of the 2004 International Crime Victimisation Survey indicate that 45% of all those victimised over a five-year period experienced more than one different types of crime. Within different crime categories, many victims also reported multiple victimisations, with 68% of all victims reporting one incident of crime, 19% reporting two incidences, and 13% reporting three or more separate incidents during the one-year period (Johnson, 2005).



Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page