Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are overrepresented in the child protection system (Higgins, 2010). Issues such as stolen generation, past government practices, intergenerational impacts, economic, material and social disadvantage can make Indigenous communities particularly vulnerable and wary of government involvement. Past issues can act as both a barrier and incentive for Indigenous people to be careproviders (Bromfield, Higgins, Higgins & Richardson, 2007 (b)). These issues add complexity to how to best support Indigenous children requiring out-of-home care in a culturally-sensitive manner (Bromfield, Higgins, Higgins & Richardson, 2007 (a)).
Kinship care for many cultural groups is natural or more in line with existing ways and traditions of caring for children. It has been suggested that kinship care for Indigenous children may be preferable particularly because of the cultural, familial and spiritual connections (McHugh, 2003, cited in Valentine & Gray, 2006). “Thus kinship care helps Aboriginal children maintain their cultural identity and connections, and this lessons the stigma of out-of-home care” (Valentine & Gray, 2006, p. 541).
Although the benefits of Indigenous kinship care are clearly evident, benefits are inextricably linked to the availabilityof quality Indigenous kin placements (McHugh, 2003 cited in Valentine & Gray, 2006). A number of Indigenous carers may already be overstretched, not sufficiently resourced/trained and not have opportunity to access services (Valentine & Gray, 2006). This adds complexity to identifying and ensuring secure and robust placements (McHugh & Valentine, 2010). This underscores the importance of examining how best to identify, recruit and support Indigenous careproviders /communities so they can provide quality placements for Indigenous children.
Although Australia does recognise the importance of Indigenous children being with Indigenous careproviders via the Child Placement Principle, it has been suggested that compared to other jurisdictions more could be done (Valentine & Gray, 2006). Valentine and Gray (2006) cite the examples of Canadian First Nations and New Zealand Maori children where there appears to be more support, financial assistance, information provision and more diligent and concerted efforts to identify kin.
Given the different kin structures and conceptualisations of family within different cultural groups, dedicated consultation and active involvement of individuals/communities in decision-making is necessitated. Breslin (2009, p. 30) makes the comment that “…there is currently a lack of guidance around what constitutes effective consultation and the approach from caseworkers is inconsistent, or a ‘tick box’ approach (NSW Ombudsman, 2008)”. This highlights the importance of clearly understanding and ensuring that quality consultation with cultural representatives, leaders and elders occurs.
Given that there is a lack of Indigenous careproviders which means insufficient culturally-sensitive placements, this raises the question of how best to identify and recruit potential Indigenous careproviders4. Recruitment of Indigenous careproviders has proved difficult (Bromfield et al, 2007 (a)). However, recruitment difficulty is not always due to willingness on the part of potential carers but rather their “capacity or ability – such as financial capacity or ability to meet eligibility criteria” (Bromfield et al, 2007 (a), p. 5). Insufficient Indigenous careproviders can also be attributed to caregivers retiring, concerns about managing children with high level needs and the stress/strain on existing carers who are often overburdened (Bromfield et al, 2007 (a) and (c)). Recruitment of Indigenous careproviders may be more successful if “using Indigenous people to recruit Indigenous carers and community based recruitment strategies…” (Bromfield et al, 2007 (c)).
Insufficient Indigenous careproviders have also been experienced by Canada’s Aboriginal peoples. Ivanova and Brown (2010, p. 1798- 1801) explored the needs of Canadian Aboriginal careproviders and found that the following support needs were valued: (1) foster system care support (e.g. support worker, assessment, school support, respite, funding to keep siblings together in the family); (2) specialist services (e.g. tutoring, medical, psychological, training for themselves to manage the specialised issues the children may have; (3) education to develop their capacities (i.e. a variety of mechanisms to educate them e.g. mentoring from others; seminars, learning units, support groups, community resources); (4) cultural and community supports (e.g. Aboriginal and cultural activities, access to traditional teachings and language, cultural support from Indigenous services and assistance to repair relationships/connections with the child’s biological parents and kinship network); (5) recreational support – financial assistance so recreational activities can be accessed and enjoyed; and (6) housing assistance. Similarly, carers in Higgins, Bromfield, Higgins & Richardson’s (2007) research reported needing: financial, practical, emotional and peer support, quality, respectful relationships between caseworker, statutory organisation and carer; more collaborative, partnership style approach, involvement in careplans, more detailed information about the child, greater contact with caseworker, having an Indigenous caseworker, contact assistance and more highly skilled practitioners who are experienced and do not impose ethnocentric attitudes.
Assessment is vital in kinship care. A different approach to assessment is suggested but effectiveness is yet to be empirically established.
Suggestions for assessment pertain to both the process and content of assessment.
The process of kinship assessment could be more collaborative, supportive and partnership based. Safety and thoroughness are still essential.
A number of kincare specific content areas as distinct to foster care assessment have been recommended.
There is substantial justification for developing quality support provision for kinship carers. Not all kincarers will have the same support requirements or the desire to receive support.
Kinship care placements can be increased by implementing more proactive measures for identifying kin. However, kinship care is not suitable for all children. Not all kin have the capacity and ability to offer care.
Cultural awareness of how kin are understood and their role in Indigenous and other cultures is important. Likewise, assessment and support provision require consultation with Indigenous communities, leaders and elders so as to ensure cultural compatibility and social inclusion.
Kinship care does require professional staff who are well trained, skilled and aware of the particularities of kinship care. Specialised training may be required.
Kinship care is different to foster care. Policy, programming and practice need to be tailored to the unique benefits, risks and requirements.
Aldgate J (2009), Living in kinship care. Adoption & Fostering, 33(3), 51-63.
Argent H (2009), What’s the problem with kinship care? Adoption & Fostering, 33(3), 6-14.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2010), Child protection Australia 2008-09, AIHW, Canberra.
Backhouse J & Graham A (2009), Grandparents raising their grandchildren: An uneasy position. Elder Law Review, Vol 6.
Black A (2009), Kinship care. Current Scottish dilemmas and some proposals for the future. Adoption & Fostering, 33(3), 40-50.
Breslin L (2009), Supporting our relative and kinship carers. Developing Practice, 24, Summer, 23-35.
Broad B (2004), Kinship care for children in the UK: messages from research, lessons for policy and Practice. European Journal of Social Work, 7(2), 211- 227.
Broad B (2006), Some advantages and disadvantages of kinship care: A view from research. In: Talbot C & Calder, M C (eds), Assessment in Kinship Care (pgs. 13 -24), Russell House Publishing, Dorset.
Bromfield L M, Higgins J R, Higgins D J and Richardson N (2007a), Why is there a shortage of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Carers? Promising Practices in Out-of-Home Care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Carers and Young People: Strengths and Barriers. Paper 1. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Bromfield L M, Higgins J R, Higgins D J and Richardson N (2007b), Barriers, incentives and strategies to enhance recruitment of Indigenous carers. Promising Practices in Out-of-Home Care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Carers and Young People: Strengths and Barriers. Paper 2. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Bromfield L M, Higgins J, Richardson N, & Higgins D J(2007c), Why standard assessment processes are culturally inappropriate. Promising Practices in Out-of-Home Care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Carers and Young People: Strengths and Barriers. Paper 3. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Bromfield L, & Osborn A (2007), Kinship care. Research Brief, 10, National Child Protection Clearinghouse, Australian Institute of Family Studies. Viewed 20 September 2010
Boetto H (2010), Kinship care. A review of issues. Family Matters, 85, 60-67.
Burgess C, Rossvoll F, Wallace B & Daniel B (2010), It’s just another home, just another family, so it’s nae different. Children’s voices in kinship care: A research study about the experience of children in kinship care in Scotland. Child and Family Social Work, 15, 297-306.
Burke S & Schmidt G G (2009), Kinship care in Northern British Columbia. Child Welfare, 88(6), 127-142.
Bunch S G, Eastman B J, & Griffin L W (2007), Examining the perceptions of grandparents who parent in formal and informal kinship care. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 15(4), 93-105.
Calder M C, & Talbot, C (2006), Contemporary assessment: A critique. In: Talbot C & Calder, M C (eds), Assessment in Kinship Care (pgs. 25 -44), Russell House Publishing, Dorset.
Calder M C, & Talbot, C (2006), Assessment in kinship placements: Towards a sensitive, evidence-based framework, In: Talbot C & Calder, M C (eds), Assessment in Kinship Care (pgs. 131 -151), Russell House Publishing, Dorset.
Carpenter S C, & Clyman R B (2004), The long-term emotional and physical wellbeing of women who have lived in kinship care. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 673-686.
Chang J & Liles R (2007), Characteristics of four kinship placement outcome groups and variables associated with these kinship placement outcome groups. Child Adolesc Soc Work J, 24, 509-522.
Coakley T M, Cuddeback G, Buehler C & Cox, M E (2007), Kinship foster parents’ perceptions of factors that promote or inhibit successful fostering. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 92-109.
Cole S A (2006), Building secure relationships: Attachment in kin and unrelated foster caregiver-infant relationships. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Sciences, 87(4), 497-509.
Crewe S E & Wilson R G (2007), 'Epilogue—Kinship care. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 22(3), 233-235.
Cross S L, and Day A G (2008), American Indian grand families: Eight adolescent and grandparent dyads share perceptions on various aspects of the kinship care relationship. Journal of Ethnic And Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 17(1), 82-100.
Cuddeback G S (2004), Kinship family foster care: a methodological and substantive synthesis of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 623-639.
Ehrle J, & Geen R (2002), Kin and non-kin foster care – Findings from a national survey. Children and Youth Services Review, 24(1/2), 15-35.
Farmer E (2009), How do placements in kinship care compare with those in non-kin foster care: placement patterns, progress and outcomes? Child and Family Social Work, 14, 331-342.
Farmer E (2010), What factors relate to good placement outcomes in kinship care? British Journal of Social Work, 40, 426-444.
Farmer E, Moyers S (2008), Kinship Care: Fostering Effective Family and Friends Placements, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
Gaska K A, and Crewe S E (2007), 'Biological Relatives. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 22( 3), 121- 136.
Gleeson J P & Seryak C (2010), ‘I made some mistakes…but I love them dearly’ the views of parents of children in informal kinship care. Child and Family Social Work, 15, 87-96.
Green Y R & Goodman C C (2010), Understanding birthparent involvement in kinship families: Influencing factors and the importance of placement arrangement. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1357-1364.
Gupta A (2008), Kinship care: Messages for policy and practice. Community Care, 1743, 24-25.
Harden B J, Clyman R B, Kriebel D K & Lyons M E (2004), Kith and kin care: parental attitudes and resources of foster and relative caregivers. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 657-671.
Harries M (2008), The experiences of parents and families of children and young people in care. Anglicare WA, Family Inclusion Network WA.Centre for Vulnerable Children and Families. The University of Western Australia.
Hayward R A, & DePanfilis D (2007), Foster children with an incarcerated parent: Predictors of reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1320-1334.
Higgins D J, Bromfield L M, Higgins R & Richardson N (2007), Supporting carers. Promising Practices in Out-of-Home Care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Carers and Young People: Strengths and Barriers. Paper 5. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Higgins J R and Butler N (2007), Assessing, training and recruiting Indigenous carers. ‘Promising Practices in Out-of-Home Care forAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Carers, Children and Young People’ (booklet 2). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Hunt J (2009), Family and friends care. In: Schofield G & Simmonds J (eds), The Child Protection Handbook. Research, Policy and Practice (pgs. 102-119), BAAF: London.
Holtan A, Ronning J A, Handegard B H, & Sourander A (2005), A comparison of mental health problems in kinship and nonkinship foster care. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 14(4), 200-207
Ivanova V & Brown J (2010), Support needs of Aboriginal foster parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1795-1802.
Kang, H (2007), Theoretical perspectives for child welfare practice on kinship care families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88(4), 575-582.
Lernihan U & Kelly G (2006), Kinship care as a route to permanent placement. In: Iwaniec D (ed), The Child’s Journey Through Care (pgs. 99-112), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, England.
Lutman E, Hunt J & Waterhouse S (2009), Placement stability for children in kinship care. A long-term follow-up of children placed in kinship care through care proceedings. Adoption & Fostering, 33(3), 28-39.
McHugh M (2009), A framework of practice for implementing a kinship care program, Benevolent Society, The University of New South Wales, Arts and Social Sciences.
McHugh M & Valentine K (2010), Kinship care and research and policy forum. Kinship Care, No 104, March, SPRC Newsletter.
Messing J T (2006), From the child’s perspective: A qualitative analysis of kinship care placements. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 1415-1434.
Murphy S Y (2008),Voices of African American grandmothers raising grandchildren. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 6 (1), 25- 39.
Nash J M (2010), Kinship care: An exploration of the practice issues encountered by Queensland child protection practitioners. Unpublished Masters Dissertation. The University of Queensland.
Palaclos J & Jimenez J M (2009), Kinship foster care. Protection or risk? Adoption & Fostering, 33(3), 64-75.
Rubin D M, Downes K J, O’Reilly A L R, Mekonnen R, Luan X & Lacalio R (2008), Impact of kinship care on behavioural well-being for children in out-of-home care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 162(6), 550-556.
Ryan S D, Hinterlong J, Hegar R L & Johnson L B (2010), Kin adopting kin: In the best interest of the children? Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1631-1639.
Scannapieco M & Hegar R L (2002), Kinship care providers: Designing an array of supportive services. Child & Adolesc Social Work Journal, 19(4), 315-327.
Sellick C, Thoburn J and Philpot T (2004), What Works in Adoption and Foster Care? Barnardo’s, Essex.
Sheahan T & Klaassen T (2010), Kinship care: Where does it belong? Australian Foster and Kinship Carers Partnership, National Conference, Mercy Family Services.
Shearin A (2007) Kinship care placement and children's academic performance', Journal of Health & Social Policy, 22 (3), 31-43.
Sinclair I (2005), Fostering Now. Messages from Research, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
Strozier A L, Elrod B, Beiler P, Smith A & Carter K (2004), Developing a network of support for relative caregivers. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 641-656.
Strozier A L & Krisman K (2007), Capturing caregiver data: An examination of kinship care custodial arrangements. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 226-246.
Talbot C (2006), Kinship care: The research evidence. In: Talbot C & Calder, M C (eds), Assessment in Kinship Care (pgs. 1 -12), Russell House Publishing, Dorset.
Valentine B & Gray M (2006), Keeping them home: Aboriginal out-of-home care in Australia, Families in Society, 87(4), 537-544.
Vimpani A (2004), Challenges for professionals working with children placed in kinship care and their families: a clinical study and literature review. Developing Practice, 10, Winter, 24-35.
Warren-Adamson C (2009), Exploring kinship care through practitioner collaborative enquiry. Adoption & Fostering, 33(3), 76-83.
Winokur M A, Crawford G A, Longobardi R C, & Valentine D P (2008), Matched comparison of children in kinship care and foster care on child welfare outcomes. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 89(3), 338-346.
Winokur M, Holtan A, Valentine D (2009), Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006546. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006546.pub2.
Yardley A, Mason J & Watson E (2009), Kinship care in NSW. Finding a way forward. Social Justice and Social Change Research Centre. The University of Sydney.
Ziminski, J (2007), Systemic practice with kinship care families. Journal of SocialWork Practice, 21(2), 239 – 250.
Zinn A (2010), A typology of kinship foster families: Latent class and exploratory analyses of kinship family structure and household composition. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 325-337.
1 See also Smith & Palmieri (2007) for mental health comparison to general population. Children residing in kin arrangements may have higher emotional/behavioral issues compared to the general population.
2 Notably, Gleeson & Seryak (2010) are referring to informal kinship placements, however this issue may also be relevant for formal kinship placements.
3 These recommendations pertain to recruiting Indigenous careproviders and are not differentiated between kin and foster carers.
4 Information provided is derived from material that discusses Indigenous careproviders - both foster and kin.