Cf. IACtHR, Case of the Five Pensioners vs. Peru. Judgment of February 28, 2003, para. 156; IACtHR, Case of Cantos vs. Argentina, Preliminary Objections, Judgment of September 7, 2001, para. 37; IACtHR, Baena Ricardo et al. vs. Panama, Judgment of February 2, 2001, para. 98; IACtHR, Neira Alegría vs. Peru, Preliminary Objections, Judgment of December 11, 1991, para. 29; IACtHR, Velásquez Rodríguez vs. Honduras (Judgment of July 29, 1988), para. 184; see also IACtHR, Advisory Opinion OC-18/2003, on the Juridical Condition and Rights of Undocumented Migrants (September 17, 2003), paragraphs 83-110 and 157; IACtHR, Advisory Opinion OC-17/2002, on the Juridical Condition and Human Rights of the Child, August 28, 2002, paragraphs 66 and 87; IACtHR, Advisory Opinion OC-16/99, The Right to Information on Consular Assistance in the Framework of the Guarantees of Due Process of Law, October 1, 1999, paragraphs 58, 113 and 128; IACtHR, Advisory Opinion OC-14/94, International Responsibility for the Promulgation and Enforcement of Laws in Violation of the Convention (Arts. 1 and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights), December 9, 1994, para. 35.
|