Inter-American Court of Human Rights


Emilio Arturo García Méndez, and



Download 3.09 Mb.
Page5/96
Date07.08.2021
Size3.09 Mb.
#90382
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   96

Emilio Arturo García Méndez, and


Mario Ramón Torres Portillo;
expert witnesses offered by the representatives:
Luis Emilio Escobar Faella, and

Ana Clerico-Deutsch.


55. Although summoned by the President of the Court, one witness did not appear to deliver his testimony.3
56. At the public hearing, both the respondent State and the representatives submitted various documents to the Court (infra para. 74).
57. On May 4, 2004, the Commission advised the Court that it had been informed that witness María Zulia Giménez, offered by the representatives, was related to one of the representatives.
58. On July 5, 6 and 7, 2004, the Commission, the State and the representatives, respectively, presented their final written submissions.
59. When they presented their final written submissions, the representatives introduced additional evidence in the form of documents referring to costs and expenses (infra para. 75).
60. On August 10, 2004, on instructions received from the President, the Secretariat asked the Commission, the representatives and the State to submit, by no later than August 24, 2004, certain documents as evidence to facilitate adjudication of the case.
61. On August 24, 2004, the representatives submitted, by fax, a portion of the documentary evidence that the Court had requested for better adjudication of the case. It arrived by courier on August 27, 2004. On August 24, 2004, the Commission sent a fax communication concerning the evidence to better adjudicate the case, part of which arrived by courier on August 30, 2004. On August 23, 24 and 25, 2004, the State sent, by fax, a portion of the evidence to better adjudicate the case. That same evidence arrived by courier on August 27, 2004. None of the parties provided all the evidence requested. On September 1, 2004, the Secretariat forwarded the evidence that each party had supplied for better adjudication of the case to the other parties.

Directory: docs -> casos -> articulos
docs -> #17622 Relational Leadership: New Developments in Theory and Practice
docs -> Leadership Development Programs and ecq-based Readings
articulos -> Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of Loayza-Tamayo v. Peru Judgment of November 27, 1998
articulos -> Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of DaCosta Cadogan v. Barbados Judgment of September 24, 2009
articulos -> Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of Albán-Cornejo et al v. Ecuador Judgment of August 5, 2008
articulos -> Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of Baldeón-García v. Perú Judgment of April 6, 2006
casos -> Operation Condor
casos -> Humberto antonio sierra porto and eduardo ferrer mac-gregor poisot case of the kali
articulos -> Official summary issued by the inter-american court

Download 3.09 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   96




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2023
send message

    Main page