In the supreme court of appeal



Download 42.01 Kb.
Page1/2
Date11.05.2021
Size42.01 Kb.
  1   2


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL


OF SOUTH AFRICA

REPORTABLE

CASE NO 431/03



In the matter between




SA BANK OF ATHENS LIMITED Appellant

and

MAY VAN ZYL Respondent
_____________________________________________________________________
CORAM: MPATI AP, FARLAM, MTHIYANE, VAN HEERDEN JJA et ERASMUS AJA

_____________________________________________________________________
Date Heard: 22 November 2004
Delivered: 21 February 2005
Summary: Summary judgment – order not sustainable where facts not fully canvassed in part due to the acceptance by both parties and the court a quo of the correctness of a High Court judgment subsequently found by the SCA to be incorrect. Parate executie not per se invalid – not in conflict with section 34 of the Constitution.



Share with your friends:
  1   2




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page