In the high court of south africa (gauteng division, pretoria) republic of south africa



Download 218.03 Kb.
Page4/4
Date15.02.2021
Size218.03 Kb.
1   2   3   4

CONCLUSION

[28] I am of the opinion that the first respondent's application does not meet the requirements contained in section 17(1)(a) and stands to be dismissed.



ORDER

In the premises, I make the following order:




  1. The first respondent's application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

  2. The first respondent is ordered to pay the costs of the application, which costs include the costs of two counsels.

___________________________



JANSE VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN

JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA

GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
Appearances
Counsel for the Appellant : Advocate R Du Plessis SC
and
: Advocate Kellerman
Instructed by : Julian Knight and Associates Inc.
Counsel for the State : Advocate M T A Moerane SC
and
: Advocate T W G Bester SC
Instructed by : The State Attorney


Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page