# In all questions, ignore relativistic effects

 Post-test In all questions, ignore relativistic effects. For any constant, e.g., the mass of an electron or muon or Planck's constant, use the following values: 1 eV = 1.6 ×10-19 J keV = kilo electron volt = 103 eV, meV = milli electron volt = 10-3 eV 1 mm = 10-3 m, 1 µm = 10-6 m, 1 nm = 10-9 m, 1 pm = 10-12 m Planck's constant = h = 6.6 × 10-34 Js magnitude of elementary charge (on an electron or proton) = e = 1.6 × 10-19 C speed of light = c = 3 × 108 m/s mass of electron = 9.1 × 10-31 kg mass of neutron = mass of proton = 1.67 × 10-27 kg mass of muon = 1.9 × 10-28 kg mass of helium atom = 6.68 × 10-27 kg mass of sodium atom = 3.8 × 10-26 kg Post-test 1. Is it possible for an electron of a given kinetic energy K to have a wavelength associated with it? Explain. 2. What is the de Broglie relation? In one or two sentences, explain its significance. 3. Consider the following conversation between two students about a double slit experiment in which a source of He atoms is so precise that it can emit one atom at a time toward the slits: ● Andy: Even if we send one He atom at a time from the source, we will observe an interference pattern on the screen after a large number of He atoms have arrived at the screen. Each He atom propagates as a wave. While passing through the slits, it splits into two waves, each with half the energy. These two waves, each with half the energy, interfere with each other. ● Caroline: I disagree. A He atom can pass through only one slit at a time. If what you are saying is true and the He atom is indeed delocalized and can pass through both slits simultaneously, we would see some sort of extended streak on the screen instead of a single flash for each He atom. With whom, if either, do you agree? (a) Andy (b) Caroline (c) Neither Explain your reasoning. 4. Suppose you send a large number of He atoms one at a time through a double slit with a slit width of 500 pm and a separation between the slits (slit distance) of 5 nm. (i) Suppose the kinetic energy of each He atom is 30 meV. Determine the wavelength of each He atom approximately (an order of magnitude approximation is sufficient). (ii) Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number of He atoms arrive at the screen. Explain your reasoning. 5. Suppose we modify the double slit experiment with single He atoms (emitted one at a time by the source) by increasing the kinetic energy of the He atoms, while keeping all other parameters the same (slit width, slit distance etc.). (i) How does the pattern on the screen change, if at all? (ii) Explain your reasoning for your answer in 5 (i). 6. Suppose we modify the double slit experiment described in question 4 by replacing the He atoms with sodium (Na) atoms keeping the kinetic energy of the Na atoms the same as the kinetic energy of the He atoms. (i) How does the pattern on the screen change, if at all? (ii) Explain your reasoning for your answer in 6 (i). 7. Suppose we modify the double slit experiment described in question 4 by replacing the He atoms with sodium (Na) atoms keeping the wavelength of the Na atoms the same as the wavelength of the He atoms. (i) How does the pattern on the screen change, if at all? (ii) Explain your reasoning for your answer in 7 (i). 8. Consider a double slit experiment in which individual photons are sent one at a time towards a double slit. The photon source is coherent and emits photons with a fixed wavelength. (i) What do you expect to observe on the screen after a large number of photons arrive at the screen? (ii) Explain your reasoning for your answer in 8 (i). 9. (i) Consider particles which can be approximated by 0.1 mm spheres. Do you expect that a double slit experiment with well-chosen parameters in which these particles are shot one at a time would show an interference pattern? (ii) Explain your reasoning for your answer in 9 (i). In questions 10-14, assume that particles are sent one at a time from the particle source. The figure below shows a double-slit experiment which was modified by adding a lamp (represented by the light bulb in the figure) between the double slit and the screen (slightly off to the side so it is not directly in front of the slits). Assume that when the lamp is turned on, if scattering occurs between a particle used in the double-slit experiment and a photon from the lamp, this scattering occurs at the slits only. Assume that ALL the particles scattered by photons still reach the screen. Fig. 1: Double slit set-up with the addition of a lamp. 10. Suppose you perform a double slit experiment with electrons while the lamp is turned off and observe an interference pattern on the screen. You then repeat the experiment with the lamp turned on (assume that the intensity of the lamp is such that every particle used in the experiment scatters off a photon). (i) Describe a situation in which this addition of the lamp between the double slit and the screen destroys the interference pattern observed on the screen (in the situation you describe, assume that all particles reach the screen even if scattering occurs between the particles and the photons emitted by the lamp). (ii) Explain why in the situation you described, the interference pattern vanishes. Question 11-14 refer to the following setup: You perform a double-slit experiment using Na atoms and observe an interference pattern on the screen. You then change the experiment by adding a lamp as discussed earlier. If slit 2 is closed, the wave function of a Na atom that goes through slit 1 and arrives at a point x on the screen is . If instead, slit 1 is closed, the wave function of a Na atom that goes through slit 2 and arrives at a point x on the screen is . For this example, if slit 2 is closed, and a total number N of particles arrive at the screen, the number density of the particles at a point x on the screen is . For problems 11-14, both slits are open. 11. For (i) and (ii) below, suppose that the wavelength of the photons is significantly smaller than the distance between the slits and the intensity of the lamp is such that each Na atom scatters off a photon. Also, assume that all the scattered atoms still reach the screen. (i) Write down an expression for the number density of Na atoms at a point x on the screen in terms of and after a large number N of Na atoms arrive at the screen. (ii) Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number N of Na atoms have arrived at the screen. Explain your reasoning. 12. For (i) and (ii) below, suppose that the wavelength of the photons is significantly larger than the distance between the slits and the intensity of the lamp is such that each Na atom scatters off a photon. Also, assume that all scattered atoms still reach the screen. (i) Write down an expression for the number density of Na atoms at a point x on the screen in terms of and after a large number N of Na atoms arrive at the screen. (ii) Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number N of Na atoms have arrived at the screen. How, if at all, is this pattern different from the pattern in 11(ii)? Explain your reasoning. 13. For (i) and (ii) below, suppose that the wavelength of the photons is significantly smaller than the distance between the slits and the intensity of the lamp is such that about half of the Na atoms scatter off a photon. Also, both slits are open and all the atoms reach the screen, including the ones that scatter. (i) Write down an expression for the number density of Na atoms at a point x on the screen in terms of and after a large number N of Na atoms arrive at the screen. (ii) Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number N of Na atoms have arrived at the screen. How, if at all, is this pattern different from the pattern in 12(ii)? Explain your reasoning. 14. For (i) and (ii) below, suppose that the wavelength of the photons is significantly larger than the distance between the slits and the intensity of the lamp is such that about half of the Na atoms scatter off a photon. Also, both slits are open and all the atoms reach the screen, including the ones that scatter. (i) Write down an expression for the number density of Na atoms at a point x on the screen in terms of and after a large number N of Na atoms arrive at the screen. (ii) Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number N of Na atoms have arrived at the screen. How, if at all, is this pattern different from the pattern in 12(ii)? Explain your reasoning. 15. You perform a double slit-experiment in which unpolarized photons are sent one at a time towards the double slit. The wavelength of the photons is comparable to the width of the slits and the separation between the slits is more than twice the slit width. In all parts (i) through (vi) below, assume that the same large number N of photons reach the screen (in other words, you wait long enough in each case to clearly observe the pattern that forms on the screen). (i) Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number N of photons reach the screen. Explain your reasoning. (ii) Suppose that a vertical polarizer is placed in front of only one of the slits. Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number N of photons reach the screen. How does this pattern differ, if at all, from the pattern observed in 15(i)? Explain your reasoning. (iii) Suppose that a vertical polarizer is placed in front of each of the two slits. Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number N of photons reach the screen. How does this pattern differ, if at all, from the pattern observed in 15(i)? Explain your reasoning. (iv) Explain the difference between the situations described in 15 (ii) and 15 (iii), namely, one polarizer placed in front of one slit only and one polarizer placed in front of each of the two slits. (v) Suppose that a vertical polarizer is placed in front of one of the slits and a horizontal polarizer is placed in front of the other slit. Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number N of photons reach the screen. How does this pattern differ, if at all, from the pattern observed in 15(i)? Explain your reasoning. (vi) Suppose that a vertical polarizer is placed in front of one of the slits and a horizontal polarizer is placed in front of the other slit. Furthermore, an additional polarizer which makes an angle of 45° with the horizontal is placed in between the slits and the screen, right before the screen. Describe the pattern you expect to observe on the screen after a large number N of photons reach the screen. How does this pattern differ, if at all, from the pattern observed in 15(i)? Explain.Share with your friends: