Heritage Conservation Briefs Property Values & Taxes



Download 37.5 Kb.
Date28.05.2021
Size37.5 Kb.
#138374

Heritage Conservation Briefs




Property Values & Taxes





  • Municipal support for the rehabilitation of heritage buildings is a smart investment

  • Property values increase, assessment values increase, and economic activity increases

  • Municipalities benefit through increased property tax and other revenues





Municipal support for rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of heritage buildings directly benefits municipalities.
The City of Victoria, B.C. has implemented a tax incentive program for residential conversion of heritage buildings amounting to a tax exemption from 1 to 10 years based on the cost of seismic upgrading required for the building. The program has stimulated:


  • the creation of 263 new residential units downtown and $32 million worth of investment in the substantial rehabilitation of 14 heritage buildings

  • 70 units of affordable housing in a former hospital built in 1908 through an adaptive reuse investment of $1.6 million


  • In the City of Waterloo, the Seagram Lofts adaptive reuse project was waived development charges, a value of about $700,000, as an incentive to redevelop the site. Prior to rehabilitation, the site was taxed as a vacant lot. The real estate value of the site is now $24,000,000, and the City collects $270,000 a year in tax revenue.

    (University of Waterloo, 2005)
    Property assessment increases that have resulted in a 60.3% increase in property taxes

  • $55.8 million of private investment

  • The construction of new “loft-style” condominiums on adjacent vacant lots, which will lead to another increase in the municipal tax base

(Plan Canada, 2003 and TIP Fact Sheet, 2006)
Investments in heritage conservation stimulate complementary economic activity, making

neighbourhoods more attractive and strengthening local economies.
Investments in the rehabilitation of the Stanley Theatre in Vancouver, B.C. stimulated:


  • 21% increase in restaurants, cafes, and bars in the area

  • 9% increase in cultural establishments, such as the design sector

  • Retail sale increases of 107.7%, or $112 million, which generated approximately an additional $8 million in sales taxes and $9 million in GST

  • Real estate price increases of 72% and a doubling of condo prices, outstripping Vancouver residential market increases

  • Building permits to increase from 1% to 16% of the permits issued in the general area

(Ryerson University, 2003)
Designated heritage properties perform better than average in the real estate market.

A groundbreaking study out of the United States indicates that public works money invested in rehabilitating heritage buildings generates more taxes than the same amount of money invested in new construction. Every $1 million invested nationally and locally in rehabilitation of nonresidential heritage buildings, new nonresidential building, and highway construction generates $202,000, $189,000, and $186,000, respectively, in state and local taxes.

(New Jersey Historic Trust, 1997)
A study investigating almost 3,000 properties in 24

Ontario communities representing a wide variety of sizes

and characteristics found that:


  • 59% of designated heritage properties had higher property values than the average when compared to surrounding market trends within the community

  • 15% had the same property values as the average

The above study found that during periods of market downturn:




  • 47% of designated heritage properties increased in value despite the downward trend of the market

  • 32% of the properties performed the same as the average

(International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2000)

Resources

Barber, S. 2003. Municipal Tax Incentives in Victoria,



British Columbia – A Case Study. Plan Canada. 43(2): 20-23.
City of Victoria. Downtown Heritage Tax Incentive Program (TIP) Fact Sheet. Provided by Steve Barber, City of Victoria. Updated 20 February 2006.
Jones, K. et al. 2003. Beyond Anecdotal Evidence: The Spillover Effects of Investments in Cultural Facilities. Ryerson University.
Listokin, D. and M.L. Lahr. 1997. Economic Impacts of Historic Preservation. New Jersey: New Jersey Historic Trust.
Shipley, R. 2000. Heritage Designation and Property Values: is there an effect? International Journal of Heritage Studies. 6(1): 83-100.
Shipley, R., M. Parsons, and S. Utz. 2005. The Lazarus Effect: An Exploration of the Economics of Heritage Development in Ontario. The Heritage Resource Centre, University of Waterloo.

Download 37.5 Kb.

Share with your friends:




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2023
send message

    Main page