Chapter 25 The Consolidation of Latin America, 1830–1920 Chapter Outline Summary



Download 69.03 Kb.
Date21.04.2016
Size69.03 Kb.
CHAPTER 25
The Consolidation of Latin America, 1830–1920





Chapter Outline Summary

I. From Colonies to Nations

A. Causes of Political Change


American Revolution

model


French Revolution

ideology


too radical

Toussaint L’Overture

1791 slave revolt

Republic of Haiti, 1804

French invasion of Spain

B. Spanish-American Independence Struggles

Mexico

Miguel de Hidalgo


1810, alliance with Indians and mestizos

Augustín de Iturbide

1824, collapse of new state

Simon Bolívar

Creole

independence movement, 1810



1817–1822, victories

Gran Columbia

Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador

1830, split

José de San Martín

Rio de la Plata

Buenos Aires, autonomous, 1810

1816, United Provinces of Rio de la Plata

1813, Paraguay split

1825, all Spanish colonies independent

C. Brazilian Independence
1807, French invasion of Portugal

royal family, elite, to Brazil

Rio de Janeiro, capital

Kig João VI of Portugal

in Brazil until 1820

Pedro left in Brazil as regent

1822, Pedro declared Brazil independent

Pedro I


II. New Nations Confront Old and New Problems
Enlightenment ideals

role of Catholic church?

equality

slavery


Indians, mestizos

franchise

A. Political Fragmentation
B. Caudillos, Politics, and the Church
Caudillos
local rulers

sometimes allied with Indians, peasants

Centralists

strong governments

Federalists

regional authorities

Liberals

individual rights

federalist

Conservatives

centralized state

Role of church?

civil role?

Some stability

Chile
reforms, 1833

Brazilian monarchy



III. Latin American Economies and World Markets, 1820–1870
Britain, U.S. support independence

in exchange for economic power

Dependency on foreign consumers

A. Mid-Century Stagnation


1820–1850

After 1850

European market created demand

Church, conservatives slow change

landowners, peasants allied in opposition

B. Economic Resurgence and Liberal Politics


Liberals in power, late 1800s

Auguste Comte, positivism

C. Mexico: Instability and Foreign Intervention
1824, Mexican Constitution
federalist

Conservative centralists v. liberal federalists

Reforms attempted, 1830s

opposed by Antonio López de Santa Anna

caudillo

War with U.S.

Benito Juárez
Zapotec Indian

liberal revolt,1854

new constitution, 1857

privileges of army and church diminished

lands sold to individuals

French intervene to assist conservatives

Maximilian von Habsburg

1867, French withdraw

Maximilian executed

Juárez in office to 1872

D. Argentina: The Port and the Nation

United Provinces of the Rio de la Plata, 1816

liberals v. federalists

Juan Manuel de Rosas, 1831

federalist

overthrown, 1852

reunification, 1862–1890

Domingo F. Sarmiento

E. The Brazilian Empire
Pedro I

1824, liberal constitution

abdicated, 1831

Pedro II


regency, 1831–1840

Economic prosperity

coffee exported

slavery intensified

infrastructure improved

Abolition

achieved, 1888

Republican Party

formed, 1871

coup, 1889

republic founded

IV. Societies in Search of Themselves

A. Cultural Expression After Independence

Elite followed Europe

1930s, Romanticism

1870s

realism


positivism

Mass culture unchanged


B. Old Patterns of Gender, Class, and Race
Little change

C. The Great Boom, 1880–1920


European demand

exports


foreign investors

Germany, U.S., Britain

D. Mexico and Argentina: Examples of Economic Transformation
Porfirio Díaz

1876, president

foreign capital used for infrastructure

revolt suppressed

1910–1920, Civil War

electoral reform

Argentina

meat exports

immigration

distinct culture

1890s

socialist party forms



strikes from 1910

Radical Party

middle class

1916, in power

E. Uncle Sam Goes South
Spanish-American War, 1898

Cuba


American investment

Puerto Rico annexed

Columbia

U.S. backs revolution



Chapter Summary

Archduke Maximilian and Benito Juárez. The assassination of Archduke Maximilian by a Mexican firing squad ended colonial rule in Mexico. The French emperor Napoléon III had placed Maximilian and his wife Carlota on the imperial throne of Mexico in 1864. In spite of the imperial couple’s desire to bring reform to their adopted country, they were seen as foreign interlopers. Respectively, Juárez and Maximilian, represented native Mexican culture and European aristocracy, as well as possible paths of Latin American development. The liberal ideals that had shaken Europe swept through the former Iberian colonies in the late 18th century. The spread of these ideas added new questions about the future of the former colonies, and the role of the former colonial powers. Most Latin American leaders in the 1800s shared the Enlightenment faith in the possibilities of reform, representational and constitutional governments, and property rights. Unlike their northern neighbors, however, the new polities of Central and South America had little colonial experience of representation or self-government. Moreover, their emergence in the climate of European industrial capitalism placed them at a disadvantage.
Chapter Summary. Most Latin American nations gained independence from colonial control early in the 19th century. The political culture of their leaders had been shaped by the Enlightenment, but they faced problems growing from their own history. Their colonial heritage did not include participatory government; highly centralized states had created both patterns of dependence and resentment. Class and regional interests divided nations; wealth was unevenly distributed. The rise of European industrial capitalism placed Latin American nations in a dependent economic position.
From Colonies to Nations. By the late 18th century, Creole elites were questioning the necessity of remaining colonial subjects. The mass of the population resented government policies. Early attempts at revolution failed because the elites feared to unloose the power of those under them. Revolutions occurred when European events stimulated local actions.

Causes of Political Change. Four external events had a major impact on Latin American political thought. The American Revolution provided a model for colonial rebellion. The French Revolution offered revolutionary ideology, but it was rejected by elites as too radical politically and socially. The slave rebellion in the French island of St. Domingue led by Toussaint L’Overture in 1791 ended in 1804 with the creation of the independent republic of Haiti. The success of the slaves frightened colonial elites and made them even more cautious about social change. The final and precipitating factor was the confused political situation in Spain and Portugal caused by French invasion, occupation, and resistance. In Spain, the French deposed the king in favor of Napoleon’s brother, but then faced prolonged civil war. Latin American Creoles declared loyalty to the Spanish ruler, but, despite loyalist opposition, began to rule the colonies themselves.

Spanish-American Independence Struggles. In Mexico, a Creole conspiracy caused Miguel de Hidalgo to appeal in 1810 to Indians and mestizos for support. After early victories, Hidalgo lost Creole support and was executed. The revolution continued and conservative Creoles under Augustín de Iturbide won independence. The new state, a monarchy based upon Creole dominance, collapsed in 1824. Mexico became a republic and Central America, until then part of the empire, divided into independent nations. In northern South America, an independence movement led by a Creole officer, Simon Bolívar, appeared in Caracas in 1810. Between 1817 and 1822 he won victories in Venezuela, Colombia, and Ecuador. The three countries were united as Gran Columbia until political differences in 1830 caused separation. In southern South America, rebellion began in Rio de la Plata under the leadership of José de San Martín. Buenos Aires opted for autonomy in 1810. In 1816 the independence of a United Provinces of Rio de la Plata was proclaimed. Paraguay separated from it in 1813. The remaining Spanish territories fell to San Martín’s forces; by 1825 all of Spanish America had won political independence. Efforts at unity failed and republics with representative governments emerged.

Brazilian Independence. By the end of the 18th century, Brazil was Portugal’s most important colonial possession. The presence of a large slave population tempered the elite’s thoughts of independence. The French invasion of Portugal in 1807 led the royal family and many of the nobility to flee to Brazil. Rio de Janeiro became the real capital of the Portuguese Empire. Brazil’s ports were opened to world commerce because of pressure from Britain, Portugal’s powerful wartime ally. King João VI remained in Brazil until 1820. The presence of the court made Rio de Janeiro into a great capital city. When João VI returned to Portugal to deal with a liberal revolution, he left his son Pedro as regent. When it became clear that Brazil was to return to colonial status, Pedro declared its independence in 1822 and became the constitutional emperor, Pedro I. Independent Brazil maintained the existing social order based on slavery.

New Nations Confront Old and New Problems. Many of the leaders of Latin American independence shared political and economic ideals of Enlightenment. There was less agreement about the role of the Catholic church as the exclusive state religion. Some leaders had egalitarian beliefs. Slavery was abolished in all the former Spanish colonies by 1854. Better treatment of Indians and mestizos was blocked by the elite’s fears of losing tax revenue and control. Property and literacy qualifications limited voting; women remained subordinate to men.

Political Fragmentation. Early efforts for political unity quickly failed because of regional rivalries and internal frictions. The great size of the Spanish colonial world and its poor transportation systems gave the eighteen new nations a local focus. The mass of their peoples continued outside of the political process.

Caudillos, Politics, and the Church. The new nations suffered from the warfare ending in independence. Armies loyal to their leaders led to the rise of caudillos, men who controlled local areas. They intervened in national politics to make and unmake governments. At times, the caudillos defended the interests of regional elites, or of Indians and peasants. In general, they disregarded representative forms and the rule of law. There were many differences among leaders about the forms of republican government. Centralists wanted strong governments with broad powers while federalists favored awarding authority to regional governments. Liberals, influenced by the French and United States models, stressed individual rights, opposed the corporate structure of colonial society, and favored a federalist government. Conservatives wanted a centralized state and wished to maintain a society where corporate groups ruled social action. The role of the church became a critical political issue. Liberals sought to limit its civil role, but met strong opposition from conservatives and the papacy. The political parties that formed, whether liberal or conservative, were led by land-owning and urban bourgeoisie individuals who shared basic class loyalties. The rest of the population was not concerned with political ideology. The result was enduring political instability, with rapid turnovers of rulers and constitutions. Only a few nations had general stability: Chile after the reforms of its system in 1833, and the Brazilian monarchy. For most of Latin America, the basic questions of government and society remained unresolved.

Latin American Economies and World Markets, 1820–1870. After the defeat of Napoleon, any plans for ending Latin American independence were thwarted by the opposition of Britain and the United States. The price for British support was freedom of trade. Britain replaced Spain as a dominant economic force in a type of neocolonial commercial system. It became a major consumer of Latin American products and sold its manufactured goods to the new nations. The free entry and export of goods benefited port cities and landowners, but it damaged regional industries producing for internal markets. The resulting dependency on foreign markets reinforced the old order, which made land the basis of wealth and prestige.

Mid-Century Stagnation. The Latin American economy was stagnant between 1820 and 1850. The mining sector had suffered from the independence wars, transportation and port facilities remained underdeveloped, and investment capital was lacking. The situation changed after 1850 when European market expansion created demand for local products. The export of coffee, hides, beef, minerals, grains, and guano brought revenues to governments, urban growth, and transportation improvements. Liberal reformers during the 1820s and 1830s attempted to break colonial patterns and follow European trends. Latin American societies were not ready for many of the reforms. The conservative weight of the church, landowners, and army remained potent, and from the 1840s they were again in power, and halted or hindered reform. An alliance between landowners and peasantry emerged to oppose change.

Economic Resurgence and Liberal Politics. Liberals returned to power during the last quarter of the 19th century. They based their policies on the positivism of Auguste Comte, stressing a scientific approach to social problems. The shift was caused by changes in the nature of the Industrial Revolution and the age of imperialism. Latin American economies expanded rapidly after 1850 and the population doubled. There were new demands for Latin American products, and foreign entrepreneurs and bankers joined liberals, landowners, and merchants to tie Latin America to the capitalist expansion of the Western economy. The new political leaders were inspired by the example of western Europe and the United States, but their distrust of their mass populations prevented the success of many efforts. Economic growth often occurred at the expense of the peasantry; landowners and governments expropriated land and developed forms of tenancy, peonage, and disguised servitude.

Mexico: Instability and Foreign Intervention. The 1824 Mexican constitution was a federalist document that established a republic and guaranteed basic civil rights. But it did not address the serious issues of inequitable distribution of land, the status of Indians, the problems of education, or the poverty of most of the population. Conservative centralists opposed liberal federalists; foreign commercial agents added complications. Liberals during the early 1830s tried sweeping reforms, but they fell before a conservative reaction led by Antonio López de Santa Anna. He was a typical caudillo, and the defects of the regime drew foreign intervention by Spain and France. War with the United States ended in Mexican defeat and the loss of about one-half of its territory. The war left a bitter distrust of the United States and caused a serious loss of Mexican economic potential. Politicians were stimulated to confront their nation’s internal problems, which had contributed to defeat. Indian lawyer Benito Juárez led a liberal revolt in 1854 and inaugurated a new constitution in 1857. Military and church privileges were curtailed and church and Indian communal lands were sold to individuals. Speculators, however, bought the land and left peasants and Indians poorer than previously. Conservative reaction led to civil war and the summoning of French assistance. The French placed Maximilian von Habsburg on the throne, but Juárez refused to accept the foreign ruler. When the French withdrew in 1867, Maximilian was captured and executed. Juárez regained office to lead an autocratic regime until his death in 1872. By 1880, Mexico was about to enter a period of strong central government and political stability.

Argentina: The Port and the Nation. The economy of Argentina was divided between the commercial port of Buenos Aires and the pampas of the surrounding territories. The United Provinces of the Rio de la Plata declared independence in 1816, but did not stay together long. Liberal efforts to create a strong central government provoked a federalist reaction, which gained power in 1831 under Juan Manuel de Rosas. A weak central government and local autonomy followed that favored the merchants of Buenos Aires and the surrounding ranchers. Campaigns against Indians opened new lands in the South. Rosas ruled in a populist, authoritarian manner and exiled the opponents. Liberals and regional caudillos joined to overthrow Rosas in 1852. After a confused decade of political turmoil, opponents compromised to create a unified republic. Between 1862 and 1890, Domingo F. Sarmiento and other able leaders initiated wide political and economic reforms. Political stability brought foreign investment; a great boost in exports brought prosperity. The population tripled as many European immigrants came to take advantage of the good times. Increased revenues allowed infrastructure development. National unity and pride grew after a successful war against Paraguay and the defeat of the southern Indians.

The Brazilian Empire. Many problems were present behind Brazil’s facade of 19th-century political stability. Pedro I issued a liberal constitution in 1824, but still acted as an autocrat. He was forced to abdicate in 1831; regents then ran the country in the name of his young son Pedro II—he came to power in 1840—in what really was an experiment in republican government. Internal disputes between liberals and conservatives were complicated by arguments for and against the monarchy. Provinces opposed centralized rule, and many unsuccessful regional revolts ensued. The development of coffee as an export crop brought economic resurgence. There was an intensification of slavery until 1850. Prosperity continued after 1850 along with political tranquility. The communication and transport systems improved; foreign investment increased. New political currents included the growth of urban and middle-class groups less tied to landholding and slavery, and the arrival of thousands of European immigrants who reduced dependence on slaves. The abolitionist movement gained strength, and slaves increased their resistance to their status. Slavery was abolished in 1888. Support for the monarchy waned. A long war against Paraguay brought the military into politics, and state quarrels with the church drew them into the opposition. Planters turned away from slavery to positivist ideas. The Republican Party, formed in 1871, won wide support, and a coup replaced the monarchy by a republic in 1889. Social and political problems caused by modernization remained unresolved.

Societies in Search of Themselves. Tension remained in cultural life between European and American influences, and between elite and folk ways. Social change for the masses and for women came slowly.

Cultural Expression After Independence. Independence opened up Latin America to direct influence from other European nations. The elite followed Europe’s examples in intellectual and artistic life. In the 1830s, Romanticism became important and turned interest to Indians and local customs. By the 1870s, the focus changed; a new realism came to the arts and literature along with the ideas of positivism. Mass culture was not affected by elite trends; traditional forms flourished, but were ignored by most of the elite.

Old Patterns of Gender, Class, and Race. Women, despite participation in the revolutions, gained little ground during the 19th century. They continued as wives and mothers under the authority of males; they could not vote or hold office. Lower-class women had more economic and personal freedom, but otherwise shared in subordination. Public education did become more open to women to prepare them for more enlightened roles in the home. New occupational opportunities opened for women in teaching. Educated women, by the end of the century, actively demanded increased rights. Most of the new nations legally ended the society of castes where status depended upon color and ethnicity. In reality, very little changed for Indians and former slaves. The expansion of the export economy in many ways intensified old patterns. Personal liberties were sacrificed to economic growth. Control of land, politics, and the economy was dominated by a small, white, Creole elite. Latin America entered the 1880s as a predominantly agrarian group of nations with rigid social structures, dependent on the world market.

Thinking Historically: Explaining Underdevelopment. Latin America, because of its early independence and entry into the world economy, provides a useful example for study of the problems faced by underdeveloped nations. Their experience grew from the influences of the Hispanic cultural heritage. When independence came, the adopted European models of economy, law, and government failed to bring either prosperity or social harmony. In the search for alternative policies, some condemned the Hispanic legacy; others turned to Marxism. Latin Americans often compared their experiences with those of the United States. Answers for the questions increasingly were sought in analyses of a world economic and political system. They turned to modernization theory, a following of the path taken in western Europe. Refinements of the theories led to an acceptance of dependency theory that envisaged development and underdevelopment as part of the same process. The process of theorizing continues.

The Great Boom, 1880–1920. Increasing demand in industrializing Europe stimulated Latin American economic growth. Liberal ideology—individual freedom, open markets, limited government intervention in the economy—prepared the way for expansion. The ideology was adopted by the small urban middle class, landholders, miners, and export merchants. These groups forged political alliances to direct governments in their favor at the expense of the peasants and working class. Export products fueled the expansion and provided resources for imports of foreign manufactures and local development projects. It was always a risky business since market prices were dependent on outside conditions. Wars occurred over control of desired resources. The developing commerce drew the interest of foreign investors. Germany and the United States joined Britain as major participants. The capital brought in was useful, but it placed key industries under foreign control, and it influenced the internal and external policies of governments.

Mexico and Argentina: Examples of Economic Transformation. In Mexico in 1876 Porfirio Díaz was elected president; he dominated politics for 35 years. Díaz imposed a strong central government and utilized foreign capital for internal infrastructure development and industrialization. His administration subverted liberal democratic principles to preserve power and continue modernization. Opposition was suppressed, and growth occurred at the expense of the peasantry and working class. When strikes and unrest increased, a national police force and the army kept order. Regional political bosses rigged elections in support of the regime. By 1910, a middle-class reform movement emerged and sought electoral reform. Other opposition groups joined it and a bloody ten-year civil war followed. In Argentina another path of economic expansion was followed. Buenos Aires and the rest of the nation worked together after 1880 to bring expansion and stability. Technological change—especially refrigerated ships for exporting meat—helped the process; labor came from a flood of immigrants. By 1914 one-third of the population was foreign-born. They fused their various European identities into a distinct culture. Workers wanted political expression, and in the 1890s a socialist party formed. Strikes and government repression marked the decade after 1910. The Argentinean oligarchy attempted some reforms. A party representing the emerging middle class, the Radical Party, took shape. Aided by the reforms of an electoral law of 1912, it came to power in 1916. When it met labor unrest, the party was as repressive as its predecessors. Similar patterns occurred in the economic and political life of the rest of Latin America. Ruling oligarchies of the traditional aristocracies, allied with the middle classes, faced rising labor and rural unrest and rebellion.

Uncle Sam Goes South. American political and economic interest in Latin America grew after the Civil War. The Spanish-American War of 1898 brought the United States directly into Latin American affairs. American investment in Cuba predated the war; following it, the door was open for direct involvement in the Caribbean. Cuba became an American economic dependency and Puerto Rico was annexed. When Colombia was reluctant to meet American proposals for building the Panama Canal, the United States backed a revolution in Panama and gained exclusive rights over the canal. Latin Americans as a consequence became very suspicious of the expansionist United States.

GLOBAL CONNECTIONS: New Latin American Nations and the World. Despite all of the economic, social, and political changes occurring in Latin America after independence, its countries remained remarkably unchanged. Revolutions and reforms changed little. The elite held on to control of economic resources; the urban sector was weak and often accommodated the elite. Most of the population worked the land without hope of improvement. Latin America, the first non-Western area to face the problems of decolonization, possessed a distinct civilization sharing much of the Western tradition, but in economics, it functioned more like regions in Asia and Africa.

KEY TERMS
Toussaint L’Overture: leader of the slave rebellion on the French island of St. Domingue in 1791; led to the creation of the independent republic of Haiti in 1804.

Miguel de Hidalgo: Mexican priest who established an independence movement among Indians and mestizos in 1810; after early victories he was captured and executed.
Augustín de Iturbide: conservative Creole officer in the Mexican army who joined the independence movement; made emperor in 1821.
Simon Bolívar: Creole military officer in northern South America; won victories in Venezuela, Colombia, and Ecuador between 1817 and 1822 that led to the independent state of Gran Colombia.
Gran Colombia: existed as an independent state until 1830 when Colombia, Venezuela, and Ecuador became separate independent nations.
José de San Martín: leader of movements in Rio de la Plata that led to the independence of the United Provinces of the Rio de la Plata by 1816; later led independence movements in Chile and Peru.
João VI: Portuguese monarch who fled the French to establish his court in Brazil from 1808 to 1820; Rio de Janeiro became the real capital of the Portuguese Empire.
Pedro I: son and successor of João VI in Brazil; aided in the declaration of Brazilian independence in 1822 and became constitutional emperor.
Andrés Santa Cruz: mestizo general, would-be leader of a united Peru and Bolivia; the union never took place.
Caudillos: leaders in independent Latin America who dominated local areas by force in defiance of national policies; sometimes seized the national government.
Centralists: Latin American politicians who favored strong, centralized national governments with broad powers; often supported by conservative politicians.
Federalists: Latin American politicians who favored regional governments rather than centralized administrations; often supported by liberal politicians.
Monroe Doctrine: United States declaration of 1823 that any attempt by a European country to colonize the Americas would be considered an unfriendly act.

Guano: bird droppings utilized as fertilizer; a major Peruvian export between 1850 and 1880.
Positivism: a philosophy based on the ideas of Auguste Comte; stressed observation and scientific approaches to the problems of society.
Antonio López de Santa Anna: Mexican general who seized power after the collapse of the Mexican republic in 1835.
Manifest Destiny: belief in the United States that it was destined to rule from the Atlantic to the Pacific.
Mexican-American War: (1846–1848); American expansion leads to dispute over California and Texas.
Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo (1848): ratified by the United States; Mexico lost one-half of national its territory.
Benito Juárez: Indian lawyer and politician who led a liberal revolution against Santa Anna; defeated by the French who made Maximilian emperor; returned to power from 1867 to 1872.
La Reforma: name of Juárez’s liberal revolution.
Maximilian von Habsburg: Austrian archduke proclaimed Emperor of Mexico as a result of French intervention in 1862; after the French withdrawal he was executed in 1867.
Gauchos: mounted rural workers in the Rio de la Plata region.
Juan Manuel de Rosas: federalist leader in Buenos Aires; took power in 1831; commanded loyalty of gauchos; restored local autonomy.
Argentine Republic: replaced state of Buenos Aires in 1862 as a result of a compromise between centralists and federalists.
Domingo F. Sarmiento: liberal politician and president of the Argentine Republic; author of Facundo, a critique of caudillo politics; increased international trade and launched reforms in education and transportation.
Fazendas: coffee estates that spread into the Brazilian interior between 1840 and 1860; caused intensification of slavery.
Modernization theory: the belief that the more industrialized, urban, and modern a society became, the more social change and improvement were possible as traditional patterns and attitudes were abandoned or transformed.
Dependency theory: the belief that development and underdevelopment were not stages but were part of the same process; that development and growth of areas like western Europe were achieved at the expense of underdevelopment of dependent regions like Latin America.
Porfirio Díaz: one of Juárez’s generals; elected president of Mexico in 1876 and dominated politics for 35 years.
Cientificos: advisors to Díaz’s government who were influenced strongly by positivist ideas.
Spanish-American War: fought between Spain and the United States beginning in 1898; resulted in annexation of Puerto Rico and the Philippines; permitted American intervention in the Caribbean.
Panama Canal: the United States supported an independence movement in Panama, then part of Colombia, in return for the exclusive rights for a canal across the Panama isthmus.


Share with your friends:




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page