 | Inter-American Court of Human Rights Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court” or “the Inter-American Court”), composed of the following judges 3.09 Mb.  96 | read |
| Inter-american court of human rights Requested by the argentine republic, the federative republic of brazil, the republic of paraguay and the oriental republic of uruguay 0.77 Mb. 30 | read |
| The Case Against Ford It goes on to accuse Ford of “execut[ing] a precise and concrete plan, using violence to rid itself of all union activity” at its factory in General Pacheco, an industrial suburb of Buenos Aires 64.5 Kb. 4 | read |
| Appendix XXIII order of the The Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs delivered on November 28, 2002 by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court”, “the Inter-American Court”, or “the Tribunal”), whereby it declared, inter alia, that 492 Kb. 5 | read |
| Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of July 6, 2009 Case of Cantos The Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs of November 28, 2002 (hereinafter “the Judgment”) delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights 81 Kb. 5 | read |
| Cite as: 23 Mich. J. Int'l L. 1 Secretary of Defense. In addition, it purports to apply to every future military commission created under the Order regardless of its location or time of creation or other relevant circumstances. [FN6] 344 Kb. 1 | read |
| Order of the inter-american court of human rights The Orders of the Inter-American Court of March 6, 2003, November 17, 2004, March 15, 2005, February 7, 2006, and February 5, 2008. In this last Order the Court resolved, inter alia 191.5 Kb. 3 | read |
 | 1. International human rights and the challenge of legitimacy Approximately as appears in The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes, A. Follesdal, J. Schaffer & G. Ulfstein, eds. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2013: 1-30 0.53 Mb. 4 | read |
| Operation Condor America in general and of the Southern Cone in particular. In this judgment (paras. 40 and 41), the Court recalls that, in its brief answering the application 182.5 Kb. 12 | read |
| John cabot university The seminar is divided into three parts, each taught by a professor adopting a different disciplinary perspective on the topic 69.5 Kb. 9 | read |
 | Category: Obligations Relating to Those in Vulnerable Situations Name of Good Practice: Indigenous Peoples’ Property Rights Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights 33.16 Kb. 1 | read |
| Official summary issued by the inter-american court Peoples.” The communities that are parties to this case consist of eight villages. The villages of the Kaliña people are Christiaankondre, Langamankondre, Pierrekondre, Bigiston, Erowarte and Tapuku 42.72 Kb. 2 | read |