Capitalism Bad Kritik Wave 1 Sophs


Link --- Exploration/Development



Download 414.29 Kb.
Page8/87
Date17.05.2021
Size414.29 Kb.
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   87

Link --- Exploration/Development


Frontierism masks the plague of the imperial capital. The utilitarian actions of the bourgeois justifies viewing humans as products to be converted into capital.


Marshall 95 (Alan Marshall is in the Institute of Development Studies at Massey University, February 1995, “Space Policy”, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6V52-3XWRMXY-11-1&_cdi=5774&_user=1458830&_pii=026596469593233B&_origin=&_coverDate=02%2F28%2F1995&_sk=999889998&view=c&wchp=dGLzVlz-zSkzV&md5=3654427bdc6e87641fbbb117001107b9&ie=/sdarticle.pdf)

Frontierism, however, is not so much a social or psychological concept as an economic philosophy. It emerges from the individualism so entrenched in American political and economic thought (which serves to secure the operation of ‘l&w faire-ism’ as sacrosanct). Frontierism involves a belief in the individual to surmount the challenges of a new situation, a new territory or a new environment and carve out an existence. Once the individual has done this they deservedly call that territory or environment their own. By this process the frontier grows larger and carves out an extended base for economic and demographic expansion, so contributing to the wealth of the nation (or more accurately to the wealth of the bourgeoisie) by turning unproductive land into an economic resource. In US history, as in the history of some of the other New World nations, frontierism was an economic policy designed to tame the wilderness and present it in economic terms as soon as possible. In reality frontierism is a more accepted and socially-sensitive word for capitalist imperialism, since (just as in capitalist imperialism) it involves the appropriation of economic resources that are considered previously unowned. Like capitalist imperialism, frontierism perceives nothing of value in the frontier lands except what can be scraped from it economically and converted into capital. In nineteenth-century USA, the value of native peoples and the value of the landscape was arrogantly ignored as the West was made to succumb to the utilitarianism of the imperialistic capitalists. Such is also the outlook of those who advocate pioneering the ‘Final Frontier’. Frontierists views that the planets and moons of the solar system are valueless hunks of rock until acted upon by humans to produce economic value and contribute to capital accumulation. Space frontierists such as Wernher von Braun, Arthur C Clark, Kraft Ehrick, William Hartmann and Gerard O’Neill feel that imperialism can be excised from their frontierism by appealing to the innate curiosity in our personal consciousness. To them, frontierism in space will amply channel the human propensity to explore and expand in a constructive and benevolent way. These rationales for space expansion must, however, stand up for themselves, since they are ultimately separate from the frontierism experienced in history. The fact that there is confusion between these socio-psychological elements and the actual economic nature of fronterism in modern day calls for space development gives credit to the nineteenth century idealogues who so convincingly tied bourgeois economic policy with populist ideology that it continues to fool so many into believing fronterism is a worthy nationalist (even universalist) ideal.




Share with your friends:
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   ...   87




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page