Bibliography – stcse students‘ and Teachers‘ Conceptions and Science Education Full Version fv09. rtf / March 23, 2009



Download 4.57 Mb.
Page29/76
Date31.05.2016
Size4.57 Mb.
1   ...   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   ...   76

Harlow, D., & Otero, V. K. (2005). Collaboration physics. Science & Children, 42(5), 35-39 // g7, P, M, FRICTION, CSC.

Harms, U., Kross, A. , Bayrhuber, H. (1998). Presentation of teaching materials based on research results concerning students´ conceptions about 'gene technology'. In H. Bayrhuber, Brinkman, F. (Ed.), What - Why - How? Research in Didaktik of Biology (pp. 212-221). Kiel: IPN - Materialien // g6,B.

Harms, U., & Krombass, A. (2008). Lernen im Museum - das Contextual Model of Learning. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 36(2), 150-166 // g7, B, BIODIV, INFORMAL.

Harper, K. A., Etkina, E., Lin, Y. (2003). Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: Meaningful patterns for instructors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 776-791 // g7, QUESTIONS.

Harrison, A., Treagust, D. (1995). Students' preferred models of atomic and molecular structure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, April 1995 // g6,P,C,ANA.

Harrison, A. (1996). Learning about atoms and molecules: Using an ontological perspective to enhance our understanding of conceptual change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of AERA, New York, April 1996, 1-15 // g6,g7,C,LPRO.

Harrison, A., Treagust, D. (1996). Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509-534 // g6,C,AT,ANA,.

Harrison, A., & De Jong, O. (2005). Exploring the use of multiple analogical modes when teaching and learning chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1135-1159 // g7, C, ANA.

Harrison, A., & De Jong, O. (2005). Using multiple analogies: Case study of a chemistry teacher's preparations, presentations and reflections. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. De Jong & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 353-364). Dordrecht: Springer // g8, CTL, ANA.

Harrison, A. G., Treagust, D. F. (1993). Evaluation of a model for teaching with analogies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, 1-24 // g7,P,O,ANA.

Harrison, A. G., Treagust, D. F. (1993). Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1291-1307 // g7,P,O,ANA.

Harrison, A. G., Treagust, D. F. (1994). Science analogies - Avoid misconceptions with this systematic approach. The Science Teacher, 61(4), 40-43 // g7,B,ANA.

Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J. , Treagust, D. F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 students´ evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 55-88 // g1,CON,AUSUBEL,g7,P,T,HEATEM,LPRO.

Harrison, A. G., Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84(3), 352-381 // g1,MODEL,ANA,g7,P,AT,C.

Harrison, A. G., Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011-1026 // g1,MODEL,ANA.

Harrison, A. G. (2001). How do teachers and textbook writers model scientific ideas for students? Research in Science Education, 31(3), 401-435 // g1,g6,MODEL,ANA,TXT.

Harrison, A. G. (2006). The affective dimension of analogy. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 51-64). Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands // g1, g7, P, O, g8, CTL, ANA, AFF.

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). The particulate nature of matter: Challenges in understanding the submicroscopic world. In J. Gilbert, O. de Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust & J. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 189-212). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers // g1, g7, C, AT.

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Particles and matter: Problems in learning about the submicroscopic world. In H. Fischler & C. S. Reiners (Eds.), Die Teilchenstruktur der Materie im Physik- und Chemieunterricht (pp. 53-76). Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin // g3, g6, g7, P, C, AT.

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Teaching and learning mith analogies: Friend or foe? In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 11-24). Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands // g1, ANA, g7, P, E, O.

Harrison, C., Hofstein, A., Eylon, B.-S., & Simon, S. (2008). Evidence-based professional development of science teachers in two countries. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 577-592 // g8, CTL, g9.

Harrison, J. K. (2005). Science education and health education: Locating the connections. Studies in Science Education, 41, 51-90 // g1, g7, B, STS.

Harskamp, E., & Ding, N. (2006). Structured collaboration versus individual learning in solving physics problems. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1669-1688 // g7, P, PROSOL.

Harskamp, E., Ding, N., & Suhre, C. (2008). Group composition and its effect on female and male problem-solving in science education. Educational Research, 50(4), 307-318 // g7, PROSOL, GEN.

Harskamp, E., Mayer, R., & Suhre, C. (2007). Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms? Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 465-477 // g7, B, MMEDIA.

Hart, C. (1987). A teaching sequence for introducing forces to year 11 physics students. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 33(1), 25-28 // g7,P,M.

Hart, C., Mulhall, P. , Berry, A. , Loughran, J. , Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655-675 // g1,LAB,g7,CSC,LPRO.

Hart, C. (2002). If the sun burns you is that a force? Some definitional prerequisites for understanding Newton's laws. Physics Education, 37(3), 234-238 // g7, P, M, FORCE.

Hart, C. (2008). Models in physics, models for physics learning, and why the distinction may matter in the case of electric circuits. Research in Science Education, 38(5), 529-544 // g7, P, E, CIRC, g8, CTL, MODEL, ANA.

Hart, P. (2007). Environmental education. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 689-726). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates // g1, g7, B, ECOLOGY.

Hartfree, W. E. (1987). Misconceptions in science and mathematics - a view from Britain. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2. Int. Seminar Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Vol. I (pp. 241-244). Ithaca: Cornell University // g1.

Hartmann, S. (2003). Multiple layers in students' understanding of force and motion. Paper presented at the 6th ESERA summerschool, Radovljica, Slovenia // g7, P, M, FORCE.

Hartmann, S., Niedderer, H. (2003). Wie vielfältig erklären Schüler und Schülerinnen Bewegungen? Eine Untersuchung zu kognitiven Schichten im Bereich Mechanik. In V. Nordmeier (Ed.), Didaktik der Physik. Beiträge zur Frühjahrstagung der DPG (Tagungs-CD). Augsburg // g7, P, M, FORCE.

Hartmann, S., Niedderer, H. (2004). Erklärungsvielfalt - Bildungschance oder Gefahr? In A. Pitton (Ed.), Chemie- und physikdidaktische Forschung und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung Band 24 (pp. 117-119). Münster: LIT Verlag // g6, P, M, FORCE.

Hartmann, S., & Niedderer, H. (2005). Parallel conceptions in the domain of force and motion. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. De Jong & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 471-481). Dordrecht: Springer // g6, P, M, FORCE.

Hashweh, M. (1996). Palestinian science teachers' epistemological beliefs: A preliminary survey. Research in Science Education, 26(1), 89-102 // g8,CTL,CSC.

Hashweh, M. Z. (1986). Toward an explanation of conceptual change. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 229-249 // g1.

Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching & Teacher Education, 3(2), 109-120 // g8,P,M,B,CTL.

Hashweh, M. Z. (1988). Describtive studies of students' conceptions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(2), 121-134 // g1,g5,g6,P,M.

Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47-63 // g6,C.

Haslam, F., Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-211 // g6,B.

Hatano, G., Inagaki, K. (1994). Young children's naive theory of biology. Cognition, 50, 171-188 // g6,B.

Hatano, G., Inagaki, K. (1996). Cognitive and cultural factors in the acquisition of intuitive biology. In D. Olson, Torrance, N. (Ed.), The handbook of education and human development. New models of learning, teaching and schooling. (pp. 683-708). Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell // g1,g7,B.

Hatano, G., Inagaki, K. (1997). Qualitative changes in intuitive biology. European Journal of Psychology Education, 12(2), 111-130 // g6,g7,B.

Hatzinikita, V., Dimopoulos, K., & Christidou, V. (2008). PISA test items and school textbook related to science: A textual comparison. Science Education, 92(4), 664-687 // g1, TXT.

Hatzinikita, V., Koulaidis, V., & Hatzinikitas, A. (2005). Modeling pupils' understanding and explanations concerning changes in matter. Research in Science Education, 35(4), 471-495 // g7, P, AT.

Hauke, B. (1981). Ein an Schuelervorstellungen orientierter Einstieg in die Elektrostatik. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht - Physik/Chemie, 29(3), 103-109 // g6,g7,P,E.

Haupt, G. W. (1952). Concepts of magnetism held by elementary school children. Science Education, 36, 162-168 // g6,P,MAG.

Haupt, P. (1979). Lernvorgaenge bei der Begriffsbildung im Chemieunterricht. Dargestellt am Beispiel: Verbrennung - Oxidation. In H. Haertel (Ed.), Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie (pp. 55-57). Hannover: Schroedel // g6,C.

Haupt, P. (1980). Probleme des Auffassungsvermoegens bei der Begriffsbildung im Chemieunterricht - dargestellt am Beispiel Verbrennung - Oxidation. Oldenburg: Universitaet Oldenburg // g6,C.

Haupt, P. (1981). Schuelervorstellungen zur Verbrennung. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht - Physik/Chemie, 29, 347-350 // g6,C.

Haupt, P. (1984). Verbrennungs- und Oxidationsvorgaenge im Verstaendnis von Schuelern. Koeln: Aulis // g6,C.

Hausfather, S. J. (1992). It's time for a conceptual change. Science and Children, 30(3), 22-23 // g7.

Hauslein, P. L., Good, R. G. , Cummins, C. L. (1992). Biology content cognitive structure: from science student to science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 939-964 // g8,B.

Hauslein, P. L., Smith, M. U. (1995). Knowledge structures and successful problem solving. In D. R. Lavoie (Ed.), Toward a cognitive-science perspective for scientific problem solving (pp. 51-79). Manhattan, Kansas: NARST // g1.

Havlada, R., & Ashkenazi, G. (2007). Coordination of theory and evidence: Effect of epistemological theories on students' laboratory practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1134-1159 // g7, LAB, CSC.

Havu, S. (2000). Changes in children's conceptions through social interaction in pre-school science education. Joensuu, Finnland: University of Joensuu // g1,CC,SCON,DISCOURSE,Vygotsky,g7,P,O,LIGHT,M,BUOY.

Hawkey, R. (2001). Walking with woodlice: An experiment in biodiversity education. Journal of Biological Education, 36(1), 11-15 // g7, B, BIODIV, MMEDIA, INFORMAL.

Hawkins, D. (1978). Critical barrieres to science learning. Outlook, 29(3) // g1.

Hawkins, D. (1994). Constructivism: Some history. In P. Fensham, Gunstone, R. , White, R. (Ed.), The content of science (pp. 9-13). London: The Falmer Press // g1.

Hawkins, J., Pea, R. D. (1987). Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 291-307 // g1.

Haworth, C., Dale, P., & Plomin, R. (2008). A twin study into the genetic and environmental influences on academic performance in science in nine-year-old boys and girls. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1003-1025 // g6, GEN.

Hay, K. E., Barab, S. A. (2001). Constructivism in practice: A comparison and contrast of apprenticeship and constructivismist learning environments. The Journal of the Learning Science, 10(3), 281-322 // g1,CON.

Hayes, J. R., Simon, H. A. (1974). Understanding written problem instructions. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition (pp. 167-200). Potomac Maryland: Erlbaum // g1.

Hayes, M. T., Deyhle, D. (2001). Constructing difference: A comparative study of elementary science curriculum differentiation. Science Education, 85(3), 239-262 // g8, CTL.

Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2007). Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Science Education, 91(6), 847-876 // g7, P, GEN, AFF.

Hazel, E., Prosser, M. (1994). First-year university students' understanding of photosynthesis, their study strategies & learning context. The American Biology Teacher, 56(5), 274-279 // g6,B.

Hazel, E., Prosser, M. , Trigwell, K. (2002). Variation in learning orchestration in university biology courses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 737-752 // g6,CTL.

Head, J. O., Sutton, C. (1985). Language, understanding and commitment. In L. West, Pines, L. (Ed.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 91-100). Orlando: Academic Press // g1,g5.

Head, J. O. (1986). Research into "alternative frameworks": promise and problems. Research in Science and Technological Education, 4(2), 203-211 // g1.

Heard, P. F., Divall, S. A. , Johnson, S. D. (2000). Can 'ears-on' help hands-on science learning - for girls and boys? International Journal of Science Education, 22(11), 1133-1146 // g7,P,M,SIMM,GEN.

Hedewig, R. (1988). Naturvorstellungen von Schuelern - Ergebnis einer Befragung von Schuelern der Jahrgangsstufen 3 bis 10 unterschiedlicher Schulformen. In R. Hedewig, Stichmann, W. (Ed.), Biologieunterricht und Ethik (pp. 212-229). Koeln: Aulis // g6,B,.

Heege, R. (1977). Sprachliche Randbedingungen in der Physikdidaktik. physica didactica, 4, 79-83 // g4.

Heege, R. (1979). Sprache - Wahrnehmung - Information und Fachdidaktik. Frankfurt/Main: Lang // g4.

Heege, R. (1981). Konvergente Beschreibungen von Bewegungsphaenomenen bei Aristoteles und bei Kindern. In D.-F. D. d. Physik (Ed.), Vortraege der Fruehjahrstagung 1981 (pp. 93-99). Giessen: 1. Physikalisches Institut // g1,g3.

Heege, R. (1981). Vorstellung, Reflexion, Intuition und die Genese physikalischer Begriffe. In R. Duit, Jung, W. , Pfundt, H. (Ed.), Alltagsvorstellungen und naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht (pp. 132-160). Koeln: Aulis // g4.

Heege, R. (1981). Was bedeutet "aristotelisches Denken" bei Kindern ? physica didactica, 8, 209-215 // g1,g3.

Heege, R., Schwaneberg, R. (1985). Zur Anschaulichkeit elektrischer und magnetischer Felder. In W. Kuhn (Ed.), Didaktik der Physik. Vortraege auf der Physikertagung 1985 (pp. 275-282). Muenchen: DPG Fachausschuss Didaktik der Physik // g6,P,E,FLD,MAG.

Heepmann, B. (1968). "Kinder auf dem Wege zur Physik". Ein Versuch zur Gewinnung von Aufschluessen ueber das kindliche Denken in verschiedenen Altersstufen aufgrund von Schueleraeusserungen. I und II. Zeitschrift fuer Naturlehre und Naturkunde, 16, 265-268, 313-318 // g6.

Hegarty, M., Just, M. A. , Morrison, I. R. (1988). Mental models of mechanical systems: Individual differences in qualitative and quantitative reasoning. Cognitive Phychology, 20, 191-236 // g6,P,M.

Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 325-360 // g7, P, M, MMEDIA.

Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1991). Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies-part 1: student learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 303-312 // g6,P.

Hegarty-Hazel, E., Prosser, M. (1991). Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies-part 2: student learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 421-429 // g6,B.

Hegeler-Burkhart, G., Welzel, M. (2004). Die Entwicklung der inhaltlichen und fachsprachlichen Kommunikation von Hauptschülern im Physikunterricht. In A. Pitton (Ed.), Chemie- und physikdidaktische Forschung und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung Band 24 (pp. 144-146). Münster: LIT Verlag // g7, P, E, LPRO, VIDEO.

Heidenreich, R., Jaeckel, K. (1986). Untersuchungen von Problemloesungsstrategien von Jugendlichen im physikalischen Bereich. In H. Mikelskis (Ed.), Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie. Vortraege auf der GDCP-Tagung 1985 (pp. 175-177). Alsbach: Leuchtturm // g6,P,M.

Hein, G. E. (1968). Children's science is another culture. Technology Review(12), 86-97 // g1.

Heinecke, C. (1997). Schuelervorstellungen ueber chemische Vorgaenge - Ausgangspunkt der Lernstrategie. Chemie in der Schule, 44(5), 184-189 // g6,g7,C.

Heinicke, C. (1997). Lernen im Chemieunterricht als Vorstellungswechsel. Der Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 50(6), 330-335 // g1,CC.

Heinze-Fry, J. A., Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping brings long-term movement toward meaningful learning. Science Education, 74(4), 461-472 // g7,B.

Heinzerling, M. (2000). Moeglichkeiten der Einfuehrung eines Energieentwertungskonzeptsim Physikunterricht der gymnasialen Oberstufe. Kassel, Germany // g6,P,EN.IRR.

Heisenberg, W. (1960). Sprache und Wirklichkeit in der modernen Physik. In B. A. d. S. Kuenste (Ed.), Wort und Wirklichkeit, 6. Folge des Jahrbuches Gestalt und Gedanke (pp. 32-62). Muenchen: Oldenbourg // g4.

Held, L., Tothhov , R. (1997). Vorstellungen der Kinder vom Bau der Stoffe am Ende der Grundschule. Chemie in der Schule, 44(3), 113-115 // g6,C,AT.

Hellden, G. (1992). Pupils' understanding of ecological processes - a preliminar report. Report No.2. The LISMA group. Learning in Science and Mathematics. Kristianstad University College, 1-23 // g3,g6,B,.

Hellden, G. (1992). Pupils' understanding of ecological processes. Report No.3. The LISMA group. Learning in Science and Mathematics. Kristianstad University College, 1-32 // g3,g6,B.

Hellden, G. (1993). Pupils' understanding of ecological processes and their conceptions of matter. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University (distributed electronically) //.

Hellden, G. (1995). Environmental education and pupils' conceptions of matter. Environmental Education Research, 1(3), 267-277 // g6,B.

Hellden, G. (1996). Elements in pupils' ideas about ecological processes. In A. Giordan, Girault, Y. (Ed.), The new learning models (pp. 142-154). Nice: Z' ditions - les auteurs // g6,B.

Hellden, G. (1998). A report from a longitudinal study of pupils´ meaningful learning about biological processes. In H. Bayrhuber, Brinkman , F. (Ed.), What - Why - How? Research in Didaktik of Biology (pp. 123-131). Kiel: IPN - Materialien // g6,B.

Hellden, G. (1999). Personal context and continuity of human thought, recurrent themes in a longitudinal study of pupils' understanding of scientific phenomena. In M. Komorek, Behrendt, H. , Dahncke, H. , Duit, R. , Graeber, W. , Kross, A. (Ed.), Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future Vol.2 (pp. 411-413). Kiel: IPN Kiel // g6,B.

Hellden, G. (2001). 19-year-old students' views of the development of their own understanding of biological processes. In D. Psillos, Kariotoglou, P. , Tselfes, V. , Bisdikian, G. , Fassoulopoulos, G. , Hatzikraniotis, E. , Kallery, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society, Vol. 1 (pp. 435-437). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki // g6,B.

Hellden, G. (2001). Longitudinal studies - providing insight into individual themes in science learning and students' views of their own learning. In D. Psillos, Kariotoglou, P. , Tselfes, V. , Bisdikian, G. , Fassoulopoulos, G. , Hatzikraniotis, E. , Kallery, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society, Vol. 1 (pp. 86-88). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki // g6,B,ECOLOGY.

Hellden, G. (2001). Pesonal context and continuity of human thought; recurrent themes in a longitudinal study of pupils' understanding of scientific phenomena. In H. Behrendt, Dahncke, H. , Duit, R. , Graeber, W. , Komorek, M. , Kross, A. (Ed.), Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future (pp. 107-112). Dordrecht,The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers // g7,B,ECOLOGY,LPRO.

Helldén, G. (2003). Longitudinal studies - Providing insight into individual themes in science learning and students' views of their own learning. In D. Psillos, Kariotoglou, P., Tselfes, V., Hatzikraniotis, E., Fassoulopoulos, G., Kallery, M. (Ed.), Science education research in the knowledge-based society (pp. 61-68). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers // g7, B, ECOLOGY.

Helldén, G. (2004). What will happen to the leaves on the ground? In H. Gropengießer, A. Janßen-Bartels & E. Sander (Eds.), Lehren fürs Leben (pp. 96-108). Köln: Aulis Verlag Deubner // g6, B, PHYSIO.

Helldén, G. (2005). Exploring understandings and responses to science: A program of longitudinal studies. Research in Science Education, 35, 99-122 // g7, B, ECOLOGY, C, P, AT, AFF.

Helldén, G., & Solomon, J. (2004). The persistence of personal and social themes in context: Long- and short-term studies of students' scientific ideas. Science Education, 88(6), 885-900 // g6, B, ECOLOGY, P, EN.

Heller, B. (1969). Sprachliche und logische Probleme des physikalischen Denkens. Beitraege zum mathematischen und naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht(17), 3-27 // g4.

Heller, P., Huffman, D. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory. A reply to Hestenes and Halloun. The Physics Teacher, 33(8), 503,507-511 // g5,g6,P,M,FORCE.

Heller, P. M. (1987). Use of core propositions in solving current electricity problems. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2. Int. Seminar "Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics", Vol. III (pp. 225-235). Ithaca: Cornell University // g6,g8,P,E.

Heller, P. M., Finley, F. N. (1992). Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 259-275 // g8,P,E.

Hellingman, C. (1992). Newton's third law revisited. Physics Education, 27(2), 112-115 // g3,g8,P,M.

Helm, H. (1980). Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students. Physics Education, 15, 92-97, 105 // g6,P.

Helm, H. (1983). "Do students understand the nature and role of scientific concepts ?" In H. Helm, Novak, J. D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Seminar "Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics" (pp. 41-46). Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University // g1.



Share with your friends:
1   ...   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   ...   76




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page