Bcc 2011-2012 Page of 1nc rd 5

The Aff undermines the ability to have a limited and stable number of Affirmatives to prepare against. This is a reason to vote negative

Download 101.61 Kb. Page 2/22 Date 12.01.2021 Size 101.61 Kb.

The Aff undermines the ability to have a limited and stable number of Affirmatives to prepare against. This is a reason to vote negative. First is substantive side bias Not defending the clear actor and mechanism of the resolutional produces a substantive side bias. Affirmatives that don’t defend the resolution make deploying other strategies against them inordinately Aff tilted. They have the ability to radically recontextualize link arguments, empathize different proscriptive claims of the 1AC while using traditional competition standards like perms to make being neg impossibly difficult. Directory: rest -> wikis -> opencaselist14 -> spaces spaces -> =1ac cards:= spaces -> There are many competing theories of race, gender, class spaces -> Democrats will keep the Senate now—best statistical models spaces -> Aff must say what “US” and what “legalize nearly all” means—vote neg spaces -> The tube of spaces -> Off our interpretation is that the aff must defend the enactment of a topical plan This does not mandate any spaces -> Sudbury 8, Professor of Ethnic Studies spaces -> No veto proof majority for Iran sanctions now but it is within grasp. It’s a top priority for the gop and Obama’s lobbying is empirically critical to prevent it spaces -> Performance fails if it operates within grid of intelligible spaces -> By Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and President Ronald Reagan Share with your friends: