At Tower
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercept
|
8.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of sodas
|
-.109
|
0.04169
|
-2.61122
|
0.028214
|
-0.20316
|
-0.01455
|
At Hall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercept
|
3.586
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of sodas
|
0.832
|
0.10824
|
7.68611
|
0.000030
|
0.58707
|
1.07676
|
At Stables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercept
|
6.977
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of sodas
|
0.110
|
0.09336
|
1.16925
|
0.272339
|
-0.10203
|
0.32036
|
A. What proportion of variance in hostility can be explained by the number of different sodas?
B. What is the 95% confidence interval for the rate of change of the At Hall prediction model? Interpret the confidence interval.
C. Predict the hostility at the three scenes using the observed number of sodas.
1) if there were 6 sodas at the X-bar Hall
2) if there were 8 sodas at the Two-Tailed Tower
3) if there were 6 sodas at the Least Squares Stables
D. Can you eliminate a murder location? Which one?
E. Which murder locations remain?
F. Which suspects still remain?
G. Which murder weapons still remain?
We Solved the Crime!
The _________________________
(Fun-loving Senior, Head Counselor, Junior w/long big toe)
did it with the
_________________________
(Power Shock, Poison M&M’s, Launched Flying Gummy Bear)
at the
___________________________!
(X-Bar Hall, Two-Tailed Tower, Least-Squares Stable)
Group member names:
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
Date/time submitted: ________________________
Share with your friends: |