A. Def.: system of laws governing the relation between people with respect to resources



Download 159.5 Kb.
Page4/9
Date21.05.2021
Size159.5 Kb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9
nuisances or similar harms? (Hadacheck, pg. 1181)

1. if yes, not a taking - no compensation required

a. don't need to compensate for eliminating a 'harm'

b. regardless of severity of damage

2. Hadacheck - P had brickyard; city developed near it; statute forbade operating within city because "public nuisance"

a. effect: diminution in value of property from $800,000 to $60,000

b. not a taking

3. acts as exception to diminution in value test

4. See D3.6 below

D3. Harm/Benefit Test: some states use

1. stems from C2

2. not a taking if preventing harm

3. taking if extracting a benefit (get indiv. to benefit public)

4. problem: defining harm & benefit

a. can be argued either way for almost everything

b. test is basically useless

5. Sup. Ct. hasn't endorsed this approach

6. severely undercuts C2 (Hadacheck)

D4.


Directory: sites -> default -> files -> upload documents
upload documents -> Always put things in threes (eskridge has ocd) I. Procedural Due Process and Reading a Case
upload documents -> Federalism – The Structure of Government
upload documents -> General Info About Property law
upload documents -> Con law professor Larry Sager Fall 1995 I. U. S. Term limits V. Thornton
upload documents -> Property with Professor Vicki Been
upload documents -> Property Outline – Professor Upham, Spring 2000
upload documents -> Constitutional law outline part I: structure of government judicial review and constitutional interpretation
upload documents -> Complex federal investigations
upload documents -> Foundations: Agency Law Introduction to law of enterprise organizations
upload documents -> Pricing v. Sanctions


Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page