Well designed multimedia software may also support the standards when it incorporates real-life situations that model the mathematics under consideration and by forming connections to other disciplines. Engaging students in real-life situations and forming connections to other disciplines that students find meaningful can be a challenge. The use of video, animation, graphics, and sound provide software engineers with the tools to model real-world situations and form connections to other disciplines in ways that aren’t possible in a traditional environment. The use of multimedia and built-in tools such as graphers and scientific calculators support the standards of using technology, multiple approaches (i.e., representations) and developing mathematical power. Mediated learning embeds the use of the technology directly into the learning environment, rather than using it in a support role such as in the “bolt-on” approach, allowing students to actively learn, explore, and conjecture with the technology at all times.
*Summary*
The *AMATYC Standards* (1995) articulate standards for the intellectual development of students, pedagogy, and content for postsecondary courses below the level of calculus. Mediated learning shows promise, based on current theory and research, as a type of learning environment in which the AMATYC standards may be implemented. As developmental mathematics educators gain more experience in mediated learning environments and more research is conducted, specific details about various implementation models for incorporating the AMATYC standards into a mediated learning environment will emerge. At the University of Minnesota General College we continue to have one eye on our mediated learning environment, and the other on the AMATYC standards, as we continue our research to bring into focus our vision of how to incorporate the AMATYC standards into a mediated learning environment.
*References*
Academic Systems Corporation. (1999, May 6). Press release. Mountain View, CA.: Author.
Academic Systems Corporation (2000). AcademicOnline 2000. Mountain View, CA.: Author.
American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (1995). *Crossroads in mathematics: Standards for introductory college mathematics before calculus*. Memphis, TN: Author.
American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges. (1999). *Crossroads in mathematics: Programs reflecting the standards*. Memphis, TN: Author.
Baker W., Hale T., & Gifford B. R. (1997). From theory to implementation: The mediated learning approach to computer-mediated instruction, learning and assessment. *Educom Review, 32 *(5), 42-50.
Becker, H. J. (1992). Computer-based integrated learning systems in the elementary and middle schools: A critical review and synthesis of evaluation reports. *Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8,* 1-41.
Bosco, J. (1986). An analysis of evaluations of interactive video. *Educational Technology, 25*, 7-16.
Davidson, N., & Kroll, D. (1991). An overview of research on cooperative learning related to mathematics. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22,* 362-365.
Dossey, J. A., Mullis, I. V., Lindquist, M., & Chambers, D. (1988). *The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up?* Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Fletcher, D. (1989). The effectiveness and cost of interactive videodisc instruction. *Machine-mediated Learning, 3,* 361-385.
Fletcher, D. (1990). The effectiveness and cost of interactive videodisc instruction in defense training and education (IDA Paper P-2372). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
Gifford, B. R. (1996). *Mediated learning: A new model of technology-mediated instruction and learning.* Mountain View, CA: Academic Systems Corporation.
Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. *Review of Educational Research, 66*, 99-136.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), *Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; New York: Macmillan.
Higbee, J. L., Ginter E. J., & Taylor W. D. (1991). Enhancing academic performance: Seven perceptual styles of learning. *Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, (7)* 2, 5-9.
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperative learning in mathematics education. In P. Trafton (Ed.), *New Directions for Elementary School Mathematics* (pp. 234-245). Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Kaput, J., & Thompson, W. (1994). Technology in mathematics education research: The first 25 years in the JRME. *Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25*, 676-684.
Khalili, A., & Shashaani, L. (1994). The effectiveness of computer applications: A meta-analysis. *Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27*, 48-61.
Kluger, A., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. *Psychological Bulletin, 119*, 254-284.
Kulik, C., & Kulik, J. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. *Computers in Human Behavior, 7,* 75-94.
Lemire, D. S. (1998). Three learning styles models: Research and recommendations for developmental education. *The Learning Assistance Review, 3(2)*, 26-40.
Lesh, R., Landau, M., & Hamilton, E. (1983). Conceptual models in applied mathematical problem solving. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), *Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes* (pp. 263-343). New York: Academic Press.
McKnight, C., Crosswhite, F., Dossey, J., Kifer, E., Swafford, J., Travers, K., & Cooney, T. (1987). *The underachieving curriculum: Assessing U.S. school mathematics from an international perspective*. Champaign, IL: Stipes.
Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. *Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 5 *(2), 129-150.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). *A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.* Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). *Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council (1989). *Everybody counts*. Washington, DC: National Academy.
National Research Council (1991). *Moving beyond myths: Revitalizing undergraduate mathematics*. Washington, DC: National Academy.
Niemiec, R., Samson, G., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. (1987). The effects of computer-based instruction in elementary schools: A qualitative synthesis. *Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 20*, 85-103.
Post, T., Behr, M., & Lesh, R. (1986). Research-based observations about children’s learning of rational number concepts. *Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 8 *(1), 39-48.
Stafford, J. Y. (1990). *Effects of active learning with computer-assisted or interactive video instruction.* Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Steen, L. A., (1989). *Reshaping college mathematics*. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Thomas, P. V., & Higbee, J. L. (1996). Enhancing mathematics achievement through collaborative problem solving. *The Learning Assistance Review (1)* 1, 38-46.
Verano, M. (1987). *Achievement and retention of Spanish presented via videodisc in linear, segmented and interactive modes*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TX. |