The Sugar Act In 1764, Parliament passed the Sugar Act



Download 43 Kb.
Date conversion29.04.2016
Size43 Kb.
The Sugar Act

In 1764, Parliament passed the Sugar Act. This law placed a tax on sugar, molasses, and other products shipped to the colonies. It also called for strict enforcement of the act and harsh punishment of smugglers. Colonial merchants, who often traded in smuggled goods, reacted with anger.

 

Colonial leaders such as James Otis claimed that Parliament had no right to tax the colonies, since the colonists were not represented in Parliament. As Otis exclaimed, “Taxation without representation is tyranny!” British finance minister George Grenville disagreed. The colonists were subjects of Britain, he said, and enjoyed the protection of its laws. For that reason, they were subject to taxation.


http://www.theworldsgreatbooks.com/acts%20of%20parliament/parliament%20sugar%20act.jpg

The Stamp Act
The Sugar Act was just the first in a series of acts that increased tension between the mother country and the colonies. In 1765, Parliament passed the Stamp Act. This law required all legal and commercial documents to carry an official stamp showing that a tax had been paid. All diplomas, contracts, and wills had to carry a stamp. Even published materials such as newspapers had to be written on special stamped paper.
The Stamp Act was a new kind of tax for the colonies. The Sugar Act had been a tax on imported goods. It mainly affected merchants. In contrast, the Stamp Act was a tax applied within the colonies. It fell directly on all colonists. Even more, the colonists had to pay for stamps in silver coin—a scarce item in the colonies.


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4d/o%21_the_fatal_stamp.jpg


Sons of Liberty

Colonial assemblies and newspapers took up the cry—“No taxation without representation!” In October 1765, nine colonies sent delegates to the Stamp Act Congress in New York City. This was the first time the colonies met to consider acting together in protest. Delegates drew up a petition to the king protesting the Stamp Act. The petition declared that the right to tax the colonies belonged to the colonial assemblies, not to Parliament. Later, colonial merchants organized a boycott of British goods. A boycott is a refusal to buy.

 

Meanwhile, some colonists formed secret societies to oppose British policies. The most famous of these groups was the Sons of Liberty. Many Sons of Liberty were lawyers, merchants, and craftspeople—the colonists most affected by the Stamp Act. These groups staged protests against the act.



 

Not all of their protests were peaceful. The Sons of Liberty burned the stamped paper whenever they could find it. They also attacked customs officials, whom they covered with hot tar and feathers and paraded in public. Fearing for their safety, many customs officials quit their jobs. The protests in the colonies had an effect in Britain. Merchants thought that their trade with America would be hurt. Some British political leaders, including the popular parliamentary leader William Pitt, agreed with American thinking about taxing the colonies.http://solmc.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/sons_of_liberty.jpg




՛°

Quartering Act
King George III, the British monarch, wanted to enforce the Proclamation of 1763 and also keep peace with Britain’s Native American allies. To do this, he decided to keep 10,000 soldiers in the colonies. In 1765, Parliament passed the Quartering Act. This was a cost-saving measure that required the colonies to quarter, or house, British soldiers and provide them with supplies. General Thomas Gage, commander of these forces, put most of the troops in New York. http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/7/7d/200px-george_iii_of_the_united_kingdom-e.jpg
Britain owed a large debt from the French and Indian War. Keeping troops in the colonies would raise that debt even higher. Britain needed more revenue, or income, to meet its expenses.
http://totallyhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/quartering-act-by-british-parliament.jpg

http://im.glogster.com/media/4/22/40/25/22402579.jpg

Townshend Acts
After the uproar over the Stamp Act, Britain hoped to avoid further conflict. Even so, it still needed to raise money to pay for troops and other expenses in America. The Quartering Act was not working. Most of the British army was in New York, and New York saw that as an unfair burden. Its assembly refused to pay to house the troops.
The King's finance minister, Charles Townshend, told Parliament that he had a way to raise revenue in the colonies. So in 1767, Parliament passed his plan, known as the Townshend Acts.
The first of the Townshend Acts suspended New York's assembly until New Yorkers agreed to provide housing for the troops. The other acts placed duties, or import taxes, on various goods brought into the colonies, such as glass, paper, paint, lead, and tea. Townshend thought that duties, which were collected before the goods entered the colonies, would anger the colonists less than the direct taxes of the Stamp Act. The money raised would be used to pay the salaries of British governors and other officials in the colonies.

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:and9gcranqywgapydnmyvry8rhmltgicczewkjonue4iu_n0brvhsubqfw

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:and9gcqjojmdsqhbrxi1qs7hag85fxdugzaxlz3ss9avszezvtf4du0ydg

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:and9gcsyxwtck6gldjnijs7yqjxljgtr2-ltsprr7uww68nrpr7plzdoha

http://mitchellarchives.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/wash-fr-ind-war-mh.jpg
Charles Townshend

Writs of Assistance

To enforce the Townshend Acts, British officers would use writs of assistance, or search warrants, to enter homes or businesses to search for smuggled goods.


The colonists were angry about the writs of assistance. Many believed, as James Otis had argued that the writs went against their natural rights. English philosopher John Locke had described these rights during the Enlightenment. The law of nature, said Locke, teaches that "no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions." The colonists felt that the Townshend Acts were a serious threat to their rights and freedoms.

http://www.willisms.com/archives/jamesotis.gif




“It appears to me the worst instrument of arbitrary power, the most destructive of English liberty and the fundamental principles of law, that was ever found in an English law-book.” James Otis, Jr., quoted in James Otis: The Pre-Revolutionist by J. C. Ridpath (referring to the Writs of assistance)



Taxation Without Representation
Colonial assemblies and newspapers took up the cry—“No taxation without representation!”
For colonists, the issue was clear. They were being taxed without their consent by a Parliament in which they had no voice. If Britain could pass the Stamp Act, what other taxes might it pass in the future? Samuel Adams, a leader in the Massachusetts legislature, asked, “Why not our lands? Why not the produce of our lands and, in short, everything we possess and make use of?” Patrick Henry, a member of Virginia’s House of Burgesses, called for resistance to the tax. When another member shouted that resistance was treason, Henry replied, “If this be treason, make the most of it!”
Boston Massacre
On March 5th, 1770, tensions finally exploded into violence. A group of youths and dockworkers, among them Crispus Attucks, started trading insults in front of the Custom House. A fight broke out, and the soldiers began firing. Attucks and four laborers were killed.
The Sons of Liberty called the shooting the Boston Massacre. They said that Attucks and the four others had given their lives for freedom. The incident became a tool for anti-British propaganda in newspaper articles, pamphlets, and posters. The people of Boston were outraged. Meanwhile, the redcoats who had fired the shots were arrested for murder. John Adams, a lawyer and cousin of Samuel Adams, defended them in court. Adams was criticized for taking the case. He replied that the law should be "deaf . . . to the clamors of the populace." He supported the colonial cause but wanted to show that the colonists followed the rule of law. Adams argued that the soldiers had acted in self-defense. The jury agreed. To many colonists, however, the Boston Massacre would stand as a symbol of British tyranny.

Tea Act
The colonists were unaware that on the day of the Boston Massacre, Parliament proposed the repeal of the Townshend Acts. One month later, all the acts except the tax on tea were repealed. The colonial boycott had been effective-British trade had been hurt. But Parliament kept the tea tax to show that it still had the right to tax the colonists. For most Americans, the crisis was over.
Samuel Adams, however, wanted to make sure people did not forget the cause of liberty. He started a drive to form committees of correspondence in various towns in Massachusetts. These groups exchanged letters on colonial affairs. Before long, committees throughout Massachusetts were corresponding with one another and with committees in other colonies.
Then, in 1773, Parliament opened up old wounds when it passed the Tea Act. Tea was very popular in the colonies, but much of it was smuggled in from Holland. The Tea Act gave the British East India Company control over the American tea trade. The tea would arrive in the colonies only in the trading company's ships and be sold there by its merchants. Colonists who had not been paying any tax on smuggled tea would now have to pay a tax on this regulated tea. This enraged colonial shippers and merchants. The colonists wondered what Parliament would do next.

http://www.theworldsgreatbooks.com/acts%20of%20parliament/parliament%20tea%20act.jpg


https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:and9gcqbapsya7oqnzilghfypo1hzzfqm47enbw42ulytmfrynbvnoih


Boston Tea Party
Protests against the Tea Act took place all over the colonies. In Charleston, South Carolina, colonists unloaded tea and let it rot on the docks. In New York City and Philadelphia, colonists blocked tea ships from landing. In Boston, the Sons of Liberty organized what came to be known as the Boston Tea Party.

On the evening of December 16, 1773, a group of men disguised as Native Americans boarded three tea ships docked in Boston Harbor. One of the men, George Hewes, a Boston shoemaker, later recalled the events.


We then were ordered by our commander to open the hatches and take out all the chests of tea and throw them overboard. . . . In about three hours from the time we went on board, we had thus broken and thrown overboard every tea chest to be found on the ship, while those in the other ships were disposing of the tea in the same way, at the same time.
George Hewes, quoted in A Retrospect of the Boston Tea-Party
http://www.landofthebrave.info/images/boston-tea-party-cooper.jpghttp://www.boston-tea-party.org/images/btp_pic13.jpg


Intolerable Acts

The Boston Tea Party had aroused fury in Britain. One British official said that the people of Boston "ought to be knocked about their ears." King George III declared, "We must master them or totally leave them to themselves and treat them as aliens." Britain chose to "master" the colonies.

 

In 1774, Parliament passed a series of laws to punish the Massachusetts colony and to serve as a warning to other colonies. The British called these laws the Coercive Acts, but they were so harsh that the colonists called them the Intolerable Acts.



 

One of the acts would close the port of Boston until colonists paid for the destroyed tea. Others banned committees of correspondence, allowed Britain to house troops wherever necessary, and let British officials accused of crimes in the colonies stand trial in Britain. To enforce the acts, Parliament appointed General Thomas Gage governor of Massachusetts.

 

In 1773, Sam Adams had written, "I wish we could arouse the continent." The Intolerable Acts answered his wish. Other colonies immediately offered Massachusetts their support. They sent food and money to Boston. The committees of correspondence also called for a meeting of colonial delegates to discuss what to do next.



http://www.theworldsgreatbooks.com/acts%20of%20parliament/parliament%20boston%20port%20act.jpg


http://www.usfca.edu/fac_staff/conwell/revolution/first.jpg




Common Sense

In early 1776, most Americans still wanted to avoid a final break with Britain. However, the publication of a pamphlet titled Common Sense helped convince many Americans that a complete break with Britain was necessary. Written by Thomas Paine, a recent immigrant from England, this pamphlet made a strong case for American independence.


Paine ridiculed the idea that kings ruled by the will of God. Calling George III "the Royal Brute," Paine argued that all monarchies were corrupt. He also disagreed with the economic arguments for remaining with Britain. "Our corn," he said, "will fetch its price in any market in Europe." He believed that America should follow its own destiny.
A VOICE FROM THE PAST
Everything that is right or natural pleads for separation. The blood of the slain, the weeping voice of nature cries, "'Tis time to part." Even the distance at which the Almighty has placed England and America is a strong and natural proof that the authority of the one over the other was never the design of heaven.http://api.ning.com/files/wtxspxpb*w1cdpxqli0*odxhkfnilraxfu1nu6iqalmw1vxg8mxgnsvvnmgcra48/thomaspainecommonsense.jpg?width=336&height=600
Thomas Paine, Common Sense
Common Sense was an instant success. Published in January, it sold more than 100,000 copies in three months. The call for independence had become a roar.

°

Midnight Riders
Spies were busy on both sides. Sam Adams had built a spy network to keep watch over British activities. The British had their spies too. They were Americans who were loyal to Britain. From them, General Gage learned that the Massachusetts militia was storing arms and ammunition in Concord, about 20 miles northwest of Boston. He also heard that Sam Adams and John Hancock were in Lexington. On the night of April 18, 1775, Gage ordered his troops to arrest Adams and Hancock in Lexington and to destroy the supplies in Concord.

 

The Sons of Liberty had prepared for this moment. Paul Revere, a Boston silversmith, and a second messenger, William Dawes, were charged with spreading the news about British troop movements. Revere had arranged a system of signals to alert colonists in Charlestown, on the shore opposite Boston. If one lantern burned in the Old North Church steeple, the British troops were coming by land; if two, they were coming by water. Revere would go across the water from Boston to Charlestown and ride to Lexington and Concord from there. Dawes would take the land route.



 

When the British moved, so did Revere and Dawes. They galloped over the countryside on their "midnight ride," spreading the news. In Lexington, Dr. Samuel Prescott joined them. When Revere and Dawes were stopped by a British patrol, Prescott broke away and carried the message to Concord.



 
Lexington and Concordhttp://www.wiscasset.k12.me.us/wms/grade7/project/cossette.rw/images/lexington%20and%20concord


At dawn on April 19, some 700 British troops reached Lexington. They found Captain John Parker and about 70 militiamen waiting. The British commander ordered the Americans to drop their muskets. They refused. No one knows who fired first, but within a few minutes eight militiamen lay dead. The British then marched to Concord, where they destroyed military supplies. A battle broke out at a bridge north of town, forcing the British to retreat.

 

Nearly 4,000 Minutemen and militiamen arrived in the area. They lined the road from Concord to Lexington and peppered the retreating redcoats with musket fire. "It seemed as if men came down from the clouds," one soldier said. Only the arrival of 1,000 more troops saved the British from destruction as they scrambled back to Boston.



 

Lexington and Concord were the first battles of the Revolutionary War. As Ralph Waldo Emerson later wrote, colonial troops had fired the "shot heard 'round the world."
The Olive Branch Petition

http://www.rain.org/%7ekarpeles/oliveb.gif

Despite this deepening conflict, most colonists still hoped for peace. Even some Patriot leaders considered themselves loyal subjects of the king. They blamed Parliament for the terrible events taking place.


In July 1775, moderates in Congress drafted the Olive Branch Petition and sent it to London. This document asked the king to restore harmony between Britain and the colonies. Some members opposed the petition but signed it anyway as a last hope.
The king rejected the petition, however, and announced new measures to punish the colonies. He would use the British navy to block American ships from leaving their ports. He also would send thousands of hired German soldiers, called Hessians, to fight in America. "When once these rebels have felt a smart blow, they will submit," he declared.

http://o.quizlet.com/i/wilydev4qwn0wy-kpdztva_m.jpg


The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2016
send message

    Main page