In the shadow of speenhamland: social policy and the

Download 214.91 Kb.
Date conversion21.02.2016
Size214.91 Kb.
1   2   3   4
Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marx, Karl. 1932. Capital. tr. by Eden and Cedar Paul. New York: E.P. Dutton.
McCulloch, J.R. [1845] 1938. The Literature of Political Economy. London: London

School of Economics.

Mills, D. R. 1980. Lord and Peasant in Nineteenth-Century Britain. London: Croom Helm.
Mingay, G.E. 1990. A Social History of the English Countryside. London: Routledge.
Mitchell, B.R. and Phyllis Deane. 1962. Abstract of British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, B.R. 1988. British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1973. The Politics of a Guaranteed Income: The Nixon Administration and the Family Assistance Plan. New York: Vintage Books.
Neuman, Mark. 1982. The Speenhamland County: Poverty and the Poor Laws in Berkshire,

1782-1834. New York: Garland.
Olasky, Marvin. 1992. The Tragedy of American Compassion. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway Books.
Overton, Mark. 1989. "Agricultural Revolution ?: England 1540-1850." Pp. 9-21 in Anne Digby and Charles Feinstein, eds., New Directions in Economic and Social History. Houndsmill, Basinstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.
---------- 1996. "Re-establishing the English Agricultural Revolution." Agricultural History Review. 44, 1: 1-20.
Parliamentary Papers. 1817. Report from the Select Committee on the Poor Laws.
--------------- 1819. Report from the Commitee on the Poor Laws
---------------- 1824. Report from the Select Committee on Labourers Wages (1824)

Persky, Joseph. 1997. "Classical Family Values: Ending the Poor Laws as They Knew Them."

Journal of Economic Perspectives. 11:1 (Winter): 178-189.
Piven, Frances Fox and Richard Cloward. 1971. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public

Welfare. New York: Vintage Books.
Polanyi, Karl. 2001 [1944]. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon.
------------- n.d. “1820 vs 1920", unpublished piece in the Karl Polanyi Archive, Concordia University.
Polanyi-Levitt, Kari and Marguerite Mendell. 1987. "Karl Polanyi: His Life and Times."

Studies in Political Economy. 22(Spring): 7-39.
Poynter, J.R. 1969. Society and Pauperism: English Ideas on Poor Relief, 1795-1834.

London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Prothero, Rowland. 1912. English Farming Past and Present. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
Reay, Barry. 1996. Microhistories: Demography, Society and Culture in Rural England, 1800-1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reekie, Gail. 1998. Measuring Immorality: Social Inquiry and the Problem of Illegitimacy.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richardson, T.L. 1991. "Agricultural Labourers' Wages and the Cost of Living in Essex, 1790-1840: A Contribution to the Standard of Living Debate." Pp. 70-90 in B.A. Holderness and Michael Turner, eds., Land, Labour and Agriculture, 1700-1920: Essays for Gordon Mingay.

London: Hambledon Press.

Rose, M.E. 1970. “The Anti-Poor Law Agitation.” Pp. 78-94 in J.T. Ward, ed., Popular Movements c. 1830-1850. London: Macmillan.

Royal Commission. 1834. Report from His Majesty's Comissioners for Inquiring into the Administration and Practical Operation of the Poor Laws. London: B. Fellowes.

Semmel, Bernard. 1970. The Rise of Free Trade Imperialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1982. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on On Entitlement and Deprivation.

Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sharpe, Pamela. 1997. "'The Bowels of Compation': A Labouring Family and the Law, c. 1790-1834." Pp. 87-108 in Tim Hitchcock, Peter King and Pamela Sharpe, eds., Chronicling Poverty: The Voices and Strategies of the English Poor, 1640-1840. Houndsmill, Basingstoke,

Hampshire: Macmillan.

Smith, Adam. 1976 [1776] The Wealth of Nations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Snell, K.D.M. 1985. Annals of the Labouring Poor: Social Change and Agrarian England.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

---------------- and J. Millar. 1987. "Lone Parent Families and the Welfare State: Past and Present." Continuity and Change 2 (3): 387-422.
Sokoll, Thomas. 1993. Household and Family Among the Poor. Bochum: Universitatsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.
Solar, Peter M. 1995. "Poor Relief and English Economic Development Before the Industrial Revolution." Economic History Review XLVIII, I : 1-22.
Somers, Margaret. 1993. "Citizenship and the Place of the Public Sphere: Law, Community, and Political Culture in the Transition to Democracy." American Sociological Review 58 (5): 587-620.

------------------1994. "Rights, Relationality and Membership: Rethinking the Making and Meaning of Citizenship." Law and Social Inquiry. 19 (1): 1301-1350.

-------------------- 1999. "The Privatization of Citizenship: How to Unthink a Knowledge

Culture." Pp. 121-161 in Victoria E. Bonnell and Lynn Hunt, eds., Beyond the Cultural

Turn. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Song, Byung Khun. 1998. “Landed Interest, Local government, and the Labour Market in England, 1750-1850.” Economic History Review LI, 3 : 465-488.
Steinberg, Marc W. 1999. Fighting Words: Working-Class Formatin, Collective Action, and Discourse in Early Nineteenth Century England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Tawney, R.. H. [1938} 1972. “The Assessment of Wages in England by the Justices of the Peace.” Pp. 37-92 in Wage Regulation in Pre-Industrial England, edited by W. E. Minchinton. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Tawney, R. H. and Eileen Power, eds. 1924. Tudor Economic Documents. 3 vols. London:


Taylor, Arthur J., ed. 1975. The Standard of Living in Britain in the Industrial Revolution. London: Methuen.
Taylor, James. 1976. "The Impact of Pauper Settlement 1691-1834." Past and Present 73

(November): 42-74.

Thompson, E.P. 1963. The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage.
-------------- 1971. "The Moral Economy of the English Crowd." Past and Present 50:76-136.
Thomson, David. 1986. “Welfare and the Historians.” In L. Bonfield, R. Smith, and K. Wrightson, eds., The World We Have Gained. Oxford: Blackwell.
---------------------1991. "The Welfare of the Elderly in the Past: A Family or Community

Responsibility." Pp. 194-221 in Margaret Pelling and Richard M. Smith, eds., Life, Death and the Elderly: Historical Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Tilly, Charles. 1995. Popular Contention in Great Britain 1758-1834. Cambridge, Mass.:

Harvard University Press.

Townsend, Joseph. 1971 [1786] A Dissertation on the Poor Laws. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Valenze, Deborah M. 1995. The First Industrial Woman. New York : Oxford

University Press.

Van Parijs, Philippe. ed. 1992. Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical

Reform. London: Verso.
Viner, Jacob. 1965 [1937] Studies in the Theory of International Trade. New York:

Augustus Kelley.

Waterman, A.M.C. 1991. Revolution, Economics and Religion: Christian Political Economy, 1798-1833. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Weaver, R. Kent. 2000. Ending Welfare as We Know It. Washington: Brookings.
Webb, Sidney and Beatrice Webb. 1927. English Local government: English Poor Law History. Part 1: The Old Poor Law. London: Longmans, Green.
--------------------. [1929] 1963. English Local government: English Poor Law History. Part II: The Last Hundred Years. Great Britain: Archon Books.
Wells, Roger A.E. 1988. Wretched Faces: Famine in Wartime England, 1793-1801. New York:

St. Martin's.

Williams, Karel. 1981. From Pauperism to Poverty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wrigley, E.A. 1986. "Men on the Land and Men in the Countryside: Employment in Agriculture in Early-Nineteenth Century England." Pp. 295-336 in Lloyd Bonfield, Richard M. Smith and Keith Wrightson, eds. The World We Have Gained: Histories of Population and Social Structure. London: Basil Blackwell.

1 Recent writings in favor of the basic income idea include Van Parijs 1992, Block and Manza 1997, and Cohen and Rogers 2001.

2 Among the important parliamentary reports that led up to the Royal Commission Report were the Report from the Select Committee on the Poor Laws (1817), Report from the Commitee on the Poor Laws (1819), and Report from the Select Committee on Labourers Wages (1824)

3 To be sure, in those years in which wheat prices were unusually high, poor law outlays would rise across the whole country since parishes had to adjust the income of dependent populations.

4 Webb and Webb (1927, pp. 221-240) provides the classic account of the failure of numerous efforts–in workhouses and farms–to derive profit from the labor of those who were in need of relief.

5 On the other hand, high rates of unemployment certainly played a role in radicalizing employed farm workers, such as those who participated in the Captain Swing rebellion in 1830. One of the main targets of the rebels were the threshing machines that increased seasonal unemployment (Hobsbawm and Rude 1968, Reay 1990).

6 Our definition of Speenhamland also excludes child allowances. The justification is simply practical--to make the story more manageable. Child allowances represented only a small proportion of poor law outlays and played little role in arguments about work disincentives. Moreover, this paper will not address the issue of child allowances as a possible encouragement to excess fertility (Boyer 1990).

7 Napoleon abdicated for the first time in early April 1814 and then returned from Elba for three more months of war in 1815. Hence, in annual series, 1813 generally marks the peak of the wartime boom because it was the last full year of war.

8 With this change in meaning, there was also a change in generosity. The post-1813 scales, even holding the price of wheat constant, were considerably less generous than those used in famine years. But the famine payments were to households with a fulltime worker and the post-1813 payments represented a fraction of what an employed worker would receive (See Hammond and Hammond [1911] 1966, pp. 181-182, for a somewhat misleading comparison of these scales.)

9 Drawing on settlement hearings, Snell (1985) argues that there was a significant decline in women's employment opportunities in the wheat growing regions from the 1790's onward. However, Horrell and Humphries (1995) family budget data show women and children providing

10 Keynes ([1923] 1932, p. 194) is explicit about the parallel when speaking of his contemporaries who favored an immediate return to the pre-war parity: "This view is in accordance with that expressed by Ricardo in analogous circumstances a hundred years ago." Polanyi (n.d.) also recognized the parallels between the two post-war periods in a short unpublished piece entitled, “1820 vs. 1920", but he chose not to emphasize this parallel in The Great Transformation.

11 There was, however, an underconsumptionist current of economic thinking in this period that favored governmental action (Link 1959, Hilton 1977, pp. 77-79). Ironically, Malthus was the chief theorist of this current that rejected the Ricardian view that supply creates its own demand (Checkland 1949, Semmel 1970).

12 The outbreak of rural disorder, in turn, played a key role in undermining rural support for the Old Poor Law (Dunkley 1982, Mandler 1987).

13 The question of the actual impact of the New Poor Law is still intensely debated. For recent discussions, see Driver 1993, King 2000.

14 For a description of the intense anti-Ricardo backlash after the 1825 crash, see Gordon
1   2   3   4

The database is protected by copyright © 2016
send message

    Main page