Should supplements become as inaccessible as prescription drugs, John Hammell, founder of International Advocates for Health Freedom (IAHF), believes that the average consumer will lose out on the benefits of simple remedies like herbs, vitamins, minerals, homeopathic remedies, and amino acids. "The name of the game for Codex Alimentari us is to shift all remedies into the prescription category so they can be controlled exclusively by the medical monopoly and its bosses, the major pharmaceutical firms," said Hammell.
Despite government denials that this could occur, the Codex Alimentari us proposals are today law in Norway and Germany, where the entire health-food industry has literally been taken over by the drug companies. Hammell explained that in these countries, vitamin C above 200 mg is illegal as is vitamin Ε above 45 IU, vitamin B-| over 2.4 mg, and so on. "The same is true of ginkgo and many other herbs, and only one government-controlled pharmacy has the right to import supplements as medicines which they can sell to health food stores, convenience stores or pharmacies," he added.
Opponents paint the Codex Alimentari us Commission as a "shady, secretive organization [that is] the thinly-veiled propaganda arm of the international pharmaceutical industry that does everything it can to promote industry objectives whilst limiting individual options to maintain health (which would diminish members' profits)."
Behind the Codex Alimentari us Commission is the UN and the WHO. According to critics, both organizations are working for multinational pharmaceutical corporations and international banks whose owners support reducing the human population through such means as reducing the availability of necessary minerals in the human diet. This, in turn, could increase the occurrences of various debilitating diseases such as cancer and diabetes, the number three cause of death in adults in the United States.
Citing a study at the University of Vancouver Medical School, naturopathic physician and author Dr. Joel D. Wallach indicated that vanadium, a soft white metallic element found in certain minerals, could replace insulin in adult onset diabetics, a condition representing 85 percent of all diabetics.
In a 2005 speech, Wallach said, "I've seen it work on hundreds and hundreds of people. Now to me this is criminal. If you write to Hills Packing Company that makes Science Diet dog food.. .high tech foods for animals.. .and say, 'How many minerals, exactly, is in Science Diet dog food?' They'll write back there's 40 minerals. You write Checkerboard Square in St. Louis, Ralston Purina, and say 'Just how many minerals are in your rat pellets for laboratory rats?' They'll say there are 28 minerals. I'll give anybody...a crisp new$100 bill if you canfind me a human infant formula in a grocery store that has more than 11 [minerals].... So dogs get40 minerals, rats get 28 minerals, and human infants get 11. Is that fair? No! Doesn't matter if you're talking about SMA, Similac, Isomilk, ProSoyB. In fact, that's why they call Similac, Similac, because it lacks everything."
While efforts in the United States to curtail vitamins and supplements have been stymied by public opposition, proponents found another ally in the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which has now made Codex a trade issue. At the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (which created the World Trade Organization), the United States agreed to submit its laws to the international standards, which included the Codex Alimentari us Commission's standards for dietary supplements. What this means is that now Codex Alimentarius is enforced by the WTO, whose international standards could supersede domestic laws without the American people's consent or vote in the matter.
According to Hammell, if a country disagrees with or refuses to follow Codex standards, the WTO can apply pressure by withdrawing trade privileges and imposing crippling trade sanctions.
The WTO was established with the understanding it was to push the world toward greater economic integration. However, according to many, the WTO has ended up politicizing trade by putting the stamp of officialdom on some very bad policies and promotes further loss of American sovereignty to supranational organizations. According to Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr., president and founder of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, "The WTO has the power to order Congress to change any U.S. law the WTO deems a 'barrier to free trade.' If Congress does not obey the WTO, then American businesses and consumers will face trade sanctions. Congress has already changed America's tax laws in response to WTO commands. It is possible that the WTO will force America to adopt the restrictive regulations of foods and dietary supplements endorsed by the UN's CODEX commission."
Despite centuries of human experience with healing herbs and vitamins, today's corporate medicine industry, especially the pharmaceutical giants that can be traced back to the Nazi I. G. Farben complex, has attempted to limit any healing agent to pharmaceuticals. Agents for this suppression of natural healing are the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Trade Commission.
Legitimate standardized codes for dietary supplements, such as Codex Alimentarius, require expensive clinical studies, research, tests, and analysis well beyond the financial reach of all but the largest corporations. In other words, a huge mound of personal narratives supporting natural remedies would be useless against a few reports from well-paid corporate scientists. "In working to protect the business interests of vaccine manufacturers [the pharmaceutical corporations], both the FDA and FTC have declared all-out war against any products that might offer consumers options other than vaccines," said Mike Adams, NaturalNem editor and self-styled "health ranger," whose articles and books have attracted a worldwide audience of nearly a million people.
"The FDA's official position is that there is no such thing as any herb, any plant, any nutrient or any dietary supplement that has any beneficial effect on the human body. Thus, no herb, plant, nutrient or supplement can EVER be approved by the FDA to protect against influenza. As you've figured out, the whole game is rigged from the start. Herbs that have anti-viral properties will never be approved as anti-virals. And, frankly, for the people running natural product companies to try to play the 'FDA game' is useless. You can never appease tyranny. Trying to 'conform' to the requirements of the FDA and FTC is like Jewish prisoners trying to conform to the wishes of Hitler. You've been condemned from the start!" said Adams.
how safe is drinking water?
Controversy over the addition of the chemical sodium fluoride to municipal drinking water supplies has raged since the early 1950s. It was a time when Nazi scientists were being settled within the United States under the auspices of Project Paperclip.
The Reader's Digest Oxford Complete Wordfihder defines fluoride merely as "any binary compound of fluorine." But fluorine was defined as a "poisonous pale yellow gaseous element of the halogen group."
Charles Eliot Perkins, a prominent U.S. industrial chemist, was sent by the U.S. government to help reconstruct the I. G. Farben chemical plants in Germany at the end of the wa r. In 1954, he wrote a letter to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, stating that he had learned that the Nazi regime had used sodium fluoride as a means of "mass control." "Iwantto make this very definite and very positive," Perkins wrote. "The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth.... The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty. Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluorine will in time gradually reduce the individual's power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing this area of brain tissue, and make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him.... I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of 'fluorine.'.. .Any person who drinks artificially fluoridated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically."
Most people do not realize that fluoride is a key ingredient in Prozac and many other psychotropic drugs. Prozac, whose scientific name is fluoxetine, is 94 percent fluoride.
Though fluoride purportedly prevents tooth decay, it only has been shown to affect decay in children under twelve. Today, two-thirds of all municipal waterand most bottled water in the United States contain sodium fluoride. Fluoride is a poisonous waste product of aluminum manufacture that accumulates in the human body. The use of aluminum cookware has been strongly linked to Alzheimer's disease, a progressive brain disorder that gradually destroys a person's memoryand ability to learn, reason, and make judgments. A Christian Science Monitor survey in 1954 showed that seventy-nine of the eighty-one Nobel Prize winners in chemistry, medicine, and physiology refused to endorse water fluoridation. Nevertheless, every U.S. Public Health Service surgeon general since the 1950s has supported putting this rat poison ingredient into America's water supply.
The experts cannot decide where the truth lies in the fluoride controversy. Virginia dental surgeon and nutritionist Dr. Ted Spencer wrote, "A few years ago, I was asked by the head of our local health department to conduct a review of existing journal research on the toxicity of fluoride with emphasis on its cancer causing potential. I went to the National Medical Library and produced for him some 40 articles on the toxicity of fluoride. When we reviewed them, there was some discrepancy in whether or not fluoride was mutagenic...half of the articles said that it was and half said that it was not. But it cannot be both ways.... We wondered what was wrong."
Spencer discovered that fluoride has been banned in European nations such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Austria, France, and the Netherlands. It is especially interesting to note that West Germany banned the use of fluorides in 1971, a time when it was still heavily occupied by Allied soldiers. "Apparently they could no longer silence the German scientists who had proved that fluoridation is a deadly threat to the population," wrote Eustace Mullins, a former Library of Congress staffer and World War II veteran who wrote numerous books on conspiracy topics including medicine, finance, and politics.
Despite Europe's bans, America continues to pursue fluoridating all water supplies and ignoring studies like those of Dr. Dean Burk, the chief chemist emeritus of the U.S. National Cancer Institute. Burk stated, "In point of fact, fluoride causes more human cancer death, and causes it faster, than any other chemical." Dr. Perry Cohn of the New Jersey Department of Health discovered a correlation between osteosarcoma—a principal childhood cancer— and fluoridation. After creating a 2005 survey in seven New Jersey counties, Cohn found the incidence of osteosarcoma in boys under the age of ten was 4.6 times higher in fluoridated areas than in nonfluoridated areas. The incidence of cancer was 3.5 times higher in the ten to nineteen age group and overtwice as high in the twenty to forty-nine age group.
Studies indicate that every major city using fluoridated water has experienced an increase in the rates of cancer. "Not a fair trade for good looking teeth," commented Dr. Spencer, adding, "All allopathically-trained dentists are very familiar with the ADA [American Dental Association] and other 'authoritative' positions on fluoride. They rarely mention its toxic potential or the few studies revealing increased tooth decay after fluoride use."
Spencer also referred to studies that suggest fluoride causes unscheduled DNA synthesis, sister chromatid exchanges, and mutagenic effects on cells. "These terms may not bother some people at all, but they mean that there will be an increase in cancer after the ingestion of fluoride," Spencer wrote. Although each person must decide for themselves the dangers of fluoride, Spencer did point to several studies with convoluted titles that conjure images of grotesque science experiments: "Sodium Fluoride-induced Chromosome Aberrations in Different Stages of the Cell Cycle," "Chronic Administration of Aluminum Fluoride or Sodium Fluoride to Rats in Drinking Water: Alterations in Neuronal and Cerebrovascular Integrity," and "Toxin- Induced Blood Vessel Inclusions Caused by the Chronic Administration of Aluminum and Sodium Fluoride and Their Implications in Dementia."
Given the massive amounts of money being paid by the pharmaceutical corporations to the corporate mass media, it is highly doubtful that many Americans will learn of the results of these studies anytime soon. The entire history of fluoride in America is one of deceit and conspiracy. In 1946, a Wall Street attorney and former counsel to the Aluminum Company of America (now known by the acronym Alcoa) named Oscar Ewing was appointed by President Truman to head the Federal Security Agency. Ewing became in charge of not only the U.S. Public Health Service but also the Social Security Administration and the Office of Education.
Congressman A. L. Miller, a physician turned Republican politician, accused Ewing of being placed in a highly paid position by Alcoa, a Rockefeller syndicate, to promote fluoridation. Miller stated, "The chief supporter of the fluoridation of water is the U.S. Public Health Service. This is part of Mr. Ewing's Federal Security Agency. Mr. Ewing is one of the highly paid lawyers for the Aluminum Company of America."
Other opponents were less kind. Leaflets handed out in New York City boldly stated, "Rockefeller agents order fluoride-(rat-) poisoning of nation's water. Water fluoridation is the most important aspect of the cold war that is being waged on us—chemically—from within, by the Rockefeller- Soviet axis. It serves to blunt the intelligence of a people in a manner that no other dope can. Also, it is genocidal in two manners: it causes chemical castration and it causes cancer, thus killing off older folks.
...This committee [Ewing's study of fluoride] did no research or investigation on the poisonous effects of water fluoridation. They accepted the falsified data published by the U.S.P.H.S. [U.S. Public Health Service] on the order of boss Oscar Ewing, who had been 'rewarded' with $750,000 by fluoride waste producer, Aluminum Co." Suspiciously, it was also reported that Ewing told fellow senators not to drink fluoridated water.
If the nightmares of natural-health advocates come to pass, a sick person soon will have no recourse but to seek professional medical assistance, which may not exist, according to recent reports.
This nation's health-care system is in a shambles. Health-care costs are moving beyond 16 percent of gross domestic product and the U.S. health-care system is sometimes 100 percent more expensive than anywhere else, yet Americans do not live as long as citizens in other nations. Every citizen in these countries is covered by a health-care plan, whereas in America, 15 percent of the population—about 47 million people—are uncovered at any given time. Fifty percent of bankruptcies in the United States are due to medical bills, and many workers avoid changing jobs forfear of losing medical coverage, especially when they have preexisting conditions.
Many factors contribute to the poor state of health care in America, including malpractice anxiety for physicians, which leads to defensive practice. Also at play is the lack of coverage for preventive and mental-health care, which could serve as a prophylactic for expensive emergency care later on. More troubling is the profiteering of insurance and drug companies—a system that rewards physicians for overprescribing drugs. In her book Overtreated: Why Too Much Medicine Is Making Us Sicker and Poorer, Shannon Brownlee explains that a serious part of the health-care issue is the lack of clinical research needed to guide physicians' decisions. According to Brownlee, up to 80 percent of health decisions involve ambiguity—the variability of diagnosis and available treatments—which leads to unnecessary treatments and costs.
But don't blame the doctors for the failures of the American health industry.
In 2009, the Wall Street Journal reported that an increasing number of doctors, including specialists, were either opting out of Medicare entirely or not accepting patients with Medicare coverage, blaming low reimbursement rates and complaining that the burden of bureaucratic paperwork was not worth the effort. Dr. Michael Ε. Truman, a Texas family physician in practice for nearly forty years, explained, "Over the past several years, I've noticed that reimbursements for services I provide are being cut or staying the same while the cost of business has escalated a great deal. Current reimbursements from Medicare are 35 percent below what most other insurance carriers pay.... I have no idea whattheyare going to do this year, but if rates are lowered 25 percent, most doctors will start limiting the number of Medicare patients they see because reimbursement is below their cost for doing business. I haven't seen anything in the new health proposals that will remedy this problem."
Truman said most large insurance companies refuse to increase reimbursements to match inflation. "We have very little to say about it except not to see their patients and that means closing our office," he said. With decreasing reimbursement, doctors will be forced to start seeing forty to fifty patients a day, which means the patients will pay the price. "They will getaboutfive minutes of the doctor's time. With so little time with the patient, the doctors will be ordering more tests to cover their ass and turning care over to their nurse practitioners.
"When I went into practice in 1972, we didn't have any PPO's or HMO's. No one stood at our front door and collected part of our fee before the patient ever got in the office. We now have to subsidize big salaries for the insurance CEO's and who knows who else.... They are getting rich off every doctor in practice today and insurance premiums are qoinq up every year to the point that many of my patients can't afford their insurance anymore and they are now paying cash. Most of the insurance companies todayare nothing but parasites, offering no vitality to medical care, just sapping whatever life is left out of it."
With more and more doctors dropping out of insurance plans, soon "there is no guarantee that you will be able to see a physician no matter what coverage you have," said Marc Siegel, an internist and associate professor of medicine at the NYU Langone Medical Center. "Of course, we're promised by the Obama administration that universal health care insurance will avoid all these problems. But how is that possible when you consider that the medical turnstiles will be the same as they are now, only they will be clogged with more and more patients? The doctors...will be even more overwhelmed."
Deserting doctors may be the least of the health-care problems facing a zombie nation. Analysts estimate that the Obama administration's proposed universal health-care program may cost upward of $2 trillion over a ten-year period. There is difficulty in even funding existing programs. In a 2009 article for FrontPageMag.com, Mackinac Center for Public Policy associate Tait Trussell warned that "we are totally unprepared fiscally even for existing programs. Neither Social Security nor Medicare is ready for the onslaught of the 78 million Americans who will stop paying into retirement programs, and who instead will begin to draw on benefits government has promised them. The first line of baby boomers began signing up for early retirement under Social Security last year Γ20081. Soon the 78-million- person tsunami of seniors will expect to be covered by Medicare."
But, just like the FDIC and Social Security, there is no stockpile of funds to fulfill government promises of health care. Payroll taxes supplying trust funds for these programs already are inadequate. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the Obama budget plan will increase federal spending 25 percent faster than revenues during the next ten years. Incredibly, this is almost modest, dollar-wise, compared to the current unfunded liability for Social Security and Medicare" noted Trussell. "It totals $101.7 trillion in today's dollars. This is more than seven times the 2008 gross domestic product (GDP), our total economy, according to calculations by the National Center for Policy Analysis. These enormous figures to fund Social Security and Medicare seem too huge to even want to be acknowledged by some policy-makers."
In February 2009, John C. Goodman, president of the Dallas-based National Center for Policy Analysis, outlined the coming costs for government programs: "In 2012, Social Security and Medicare will need one out of every ten general income tax dollars to make up for their combined deficits. By2020, the federal government will need one out of every four income tax dollars to pay for these programs. By 2030, the midpoint of the Baby Boomer retirement years, it will require one of every two income tax dollars. So it is clear that the federal government will be forced either to scale back everything else it's doing in a drastic way or raise taxes dramatically."
Goodman added, "If health-care consumers are allowed to save and spend their own money, and if doctors are allowed to act like entrepreneurs—if we allow the market to work—there is every reason to believe that health care costs can be prevented from rising faster than our incomes. Otherwise, prepare for the tax tsunami."
Is it possible that the globalists foresee this looming tax tsunami only too well and are siphoning everydime out of the U.S. economy before it hits? Such calamity could provide the very excuse they need to gain total control of not only the U.S. economy but also the economies of the nations who support the U.S. dollar.
Over and beyond the stretched-thin health-care industry and approaching financial chaos, even more medical horrors loom on the horizon.
THE MYCOPLASMA ATTACK
The victims of the neurodegenerative/systemic degenerative disease Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Fibromyalgia are ill with a very real physical disease deriving from a sub-viral particle developed from the Brucellosis bacterial toxin.
—Donald W. and William L. C. Scott, authors of The Brucellosis Triangle
In recent horror movies, tiny microorganisms infect humans and turn them into flesh-eating zombies. Often, the virus has been accidentally loosed from a covert government laboratory. Although it doesn't seem like a pathogen exists for transforming a normal person into a cannibalistic zombie, there are a number of man-made germs and toxins that have been in development since before World War II that can devastate the human body.
NAZI AND JAPANESE BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
In the wake of World War II, thousands of die-hard Nazis were arriving in the United States, thanks to a technology- for-immunityswap arranged between Hitler's right-hand man, Martin Bormann, and America's Wall Street elite, which included John J. McCloy and his protege, Allen Dulles.
According to Dr. Len G. Horowitz's research, "The WHO [World Health Organization] was heavily funded and influenced by the Rockefeller family, along with the United Nations and the World Bank...[and] the fact that John D. Rockefeller's business managers and lawyers, John Foster and Allen Dulles, had created the partnership between the world's largest oil conglomerate and I. G. Farben— Germany's leading industrial organization prior to World War II...." Before the war, attorney McCloy had represented the I. G. Farben drug combine. In The Rise of the Fourth Reich, it was detailed how the Dulles brothers and their prewar work for Schroeder, Rockefeller & Company, City National Bank chairman John J. McCloy, and Union Banking Corporation director Prescott Bush acted as principal agents for Hitler's Germany. It might also be noted that the UN building in NewYork City sits on Rockefeller- donated land.
McCloy, who served as high commissioner in postwar Germany, also was chairman of the Ford Foundation, Chase Manhattan Bank, the Salk Institute, E. R. Squibb & Sons, and the powerful Council on Foreign Relations, described in the NewYork Times as a group that "fixes major goals and constitutes itself a ready pool of manpower for the more exacting labors of leadership." In his 1989 Times obituary, McCloy was termed "chairman of the Establishment."
Though U.S. laws were in place to forbid postwar Germans from conducting research on chemical warfare, these were largely ignored as John McCloy hired experts as "consultants" and helped fund German industries to produce chemical warfare materials for the American military. At the same time, Allen Dulles was named director of the CIA. Priorto the war he had served as legal representative of the Nazi Shroeder Bank and then during the war as an officer for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), where he supervised army intelligence translator Henry Kissinger, who would go on to become secretary of state under President Richard Nixon. It was Dulles as head of the CIA who expunged many Paperclip scientists' Nazi backgrounds.
During this time, Wernher von Braun, long considered the father of our NASA space program, and other top rocket scientists entered the country, along with Walter Emil Schreiber, the chief of Nazi medical science who had supervised the sterilization of men using surgery, X-rays, and drugs and had overseen the exchange of humans and mice as recipients of a deadly typhus virus. Despite being described as "the prototype of an ardent and convinced Nazi," Schreiber worked for a decade in the chemical division of the U.S. European Command and fora time at the Air Force School of Aviation Medicine in Texas.
Another German immigrant, Kurt Blome, told U.S. military interrogators in 1945 that he had been ordered in 1943 to experiment with plague vaccines on concentration camp prisoners. Blome went on to work for the U.S. Army Chemical Corp. These Nazis were joined at Fort Detrick by Japanese general Ishii Shiro, the man in charge of the infamous Unit 731, the Japanese biological research and development unit responsible for the deaths of three thousand people, including American prisoners.
It was the work of such enemy researchers that was continued and expanded in the United States following World War II that may have resulted in many recent health disasters.
MYCOPLASMAS AND PRIONS
In the early 1940s, Nazi medical scientists had managed to isolate the bacterial toxin from Brucella bacteria (usually known as Brucellosis or undulant fever and mostly found in mammals, especially cows) and form it into a crystalline form or agent.
Brucellosis is an ancient bacteria and was selected because it was insidious, very difficult to detect, and present in almost every organ or system of the human body. When activated by the crystalline agent, brucellosis stimulates various diseases that prompt a variety of symptoms, including debilitating fatigue, high fever, shivering, aching, drenching sweats, headache, backache, weakness, and depression. Damage to major organs is possible, leading to ailments such as multiple sclerosis, arthritis, and heart disease.
The Paperclip medical scientists coming to America brought with them this toxin, known as a mycoplasma—a distinct type of bacteria lacking a cell wall. A U.S. government report dated January 3,1946, carried a section entitled "Production and Isolation, for the First Time, of a Crystalline Bacterial Toxin." The Nazi bug had been reduced to a crystalline form, creating an artificial virulent disease agent derived from the original bacteria.
This crystalline bacterial agent could be dispensed by aerial spraying or by infected insects. The agent also did not respond to most antibiotics, including penicillin. Acting as a parasite, it stimulated both bacterial and viral diseases and, because it attached to specific cells without killing them, was virtually undetectable by conventional medical diagnosis techniques. Such diseases are considered untreatable and usually fatal, because they mostly affect the brain or neural tissue.
These subviral bacterium particles have various names. They have been termed "prions" by Nobel Prize winner Dr. Stanley B. Prusiner; "stealth viruses" by Dr. John Martin of the Center for Complex Infectious Diseases; "amyloids" by the late Dr. Carleton Gajdusek, winner of the 1976 Nobel Prize in Medicine for his work on mysterious epidemics at the National Institutes of Health (NIH); and "Mycoplasma/Brucellosis" by Donald Scott and Garth Nicolson.
According to a paper by Stanley Prusiner, prions are unprecedented infectious pathogens that cause fatal neurodegenerative diseases by the entirely novel mechanism of altering proteins in the body. "Prion diseases may present as genetic, infectious, or sporadic disorders, all of which involve modification of the prion protein (PrP)," wrote Prusiner.
Paperclip scientists working on these infectious organisms were based primarily in laboratories at Fort Detrick, Maryland; Cold Spring Harbor, NewYork; and Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland. "It was here and in hundreds of other laboratories throughout America that immediately after World War II our former enemies' scientists were brought in under Operation Paperclip to continue their research and development of some of the most horrible weapons of mass destruction known to mankind," noted molecular researchers Garth and Nancy Nicolson in their 2005 book Project Day Lily.
The husband and wife molecular researchers noted there are two hundred species of Mycoplasma. Most are innocuous and do no harm. Only four or five are pathogenic. "Mycoplasma fermentans (incognitus strain) probably comes from the nucleus of the Brucella bacterium. This disease agent is not a bacterium and not a virus; it is a mutated form of the Brucella bacterium, combined with a visna virus, from which the mycoplasma is extracted," they said. "[T|he little mycoplasma also lost some of its genetic information, such as the genes that encode the thick cell wall and other genes that code for certain enzymes in metabolic pathways. Thus it is smaller than the most common bacteria, and without the distinctive cell walls found in most bacteria it can take on a variety of morphologies. It must hide inside animal or human cells to survive, and although originally thought to be fairly fragile, the little mycoplasma was hardier than anyone had ever imagined."
Although considered primitive by bacteriological standards, the mycoplasma actually evolved from bacteria that contained cell walls but lost its ability to make its own cell wall, probably because it no longer needed it when hiding inside hosts' cells and tissues. "But it made up for the loss of some of its genetic information by having evolved with other genetic sequences that allowed it to enter and colonize cells just like viruses.... [But] it was nota virus because it retained the genetic and biochemical remnants of bacteria. Like a virus, however, it damaged cells by interfering with some of the cells' biochemical cycles, and it encoded some nasty molecules that caused invaded cells to slowly self-destruct and die," said the Nicolsons, noting that important targets inside cells were the mitochondria, cellular "batteries" that produce energy and the DNA.
The Nicolsons explained that biological warfare research conducted between 1942 and now has created more deadly and infectious forms of mycoplasma. Continuing the work of Nazi scientists, researchers in the United States "weaponized" the mycoplasma by reducing the pathogen to a synthesized crystalline form. They later tested it on an unsuspecting public in North America.
According to the Nicolsons, the U.S. military's fascination with building this kind of biological weapon lies in the fact that the "creature will hide inside cells and cause unbelievable havoc. It will destroy the mitochondria, eventually sending cells into an unrelenting death program, and in the process gene expression will go crazy and surrounding cells will become damaged. This bug will then escape from its dying host cell and go to other places to eventually colonize every organ. And because pieces of the cellular membrane are dislodged when this little mycoplasma leaves its cellular hiding places, its victims should also be presented with an array of autoimmune symptoms similar to those found in various degenerative illnesses. It may even mimic some neurodegenerative diseases. It's beautiful, because it should cause diseases such as multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, but no one will ever guess that they are caused by an infection. Most physicians...will neverfigure this out.... Whata delightful weapon!"
Several researchers, including the Nicolsons, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, Dr. Joseph S. Puleo, and authors of The Brucellosis Triangle, Donald W. and William L. C. Scott, have linked this mycoplasma pathogen to a host of increasingly common neurosystemic diseases, such as Alzheimer's, bipolar disorder, Crohn's colitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, Creutzfeldt-Jakob, diabetes, dystonia, fibromyalgia, Huntington's, lupus, Lyme disease, multiple sclerosis, myalgic encephalomyelitis, Parkinson's disease, and even schizophrenia. Some strains of Mycoplasma are now being blamed for cancer and AIDS. According to the former chief virologist for the pharmaceutical company Merck Sharp & Dohme, the late Dr. Maurice Hilleman, this disease agent is now carried by everybody in North America and possibly most people throughout the world.
Mycoplasma researchers claim many people today suffering from various neurological diseases are actually ill with brucellosis. However, because the disease toxin pathogen has been isolated from the source bacterium in a crystalline form, there is no blood or tissue test that will confirm this fact.
Weaponized mycoplasmas generate ammonias that are deposited into the infected cell nuclei. "These nasty 'beasts' intertwine with the genetic machinery and are intracellular rather than inter-cellular. Other infectious agents are involved in the afflicted individual. These agents are usually mosaics of naturally occurring bacteria and viruses, and the effect upon the afflicted individual depends upon the individual's genetic pre-disposition and immunological make-up," stated Garth Nicolson. "Each person is affected differently by the infection, but all afflicted individuals share a constellation of symptoms.
"We have a survey that describes 120 signs and symptoms," added Nancy Nicolson. "In the case of the pathogenic mycoplasmas that we investigated, we found the HIV-1 envelope gene associated with the mycoplasma. This gene renders the mycoplasma more deadly. I have always wondered how many people that have been diagnosed as HIV positive actually have the chimeric—a mosaic of the mycoplasma bacterianand HIV?" Reportedly there are ten strains of HIV. HIV-1 promotes AIDS by compromising the immunization system, whereas HIV-2 does not promote AIDS. The other eight HIV strains are included in the biowarfare arsenal. The pathogenic mycoplasma can promote a non-HIV AIDS that mimics the symptoms of AIDS. "No one will talk about this!" said Nancy Nicolson. "The mycoplasmas have been genetically engineered with pieces of genetic material from other pathogens such as brucella. The mycoplasmas are often co-factors with the Lyme disease microorganism. All these emerging diseases correlate to bio-warfare experiments conducted during the Cold War that went seriously awry. Rememberthe US did approximately 208 open airtests on the US population without their knowledge or consent over a 30 years period."
It is possible that the crystalline disease toxin from the pathogens is one of the Mycoplasma species—a technological feat accomplished by U.S. military biochemical researchers working with Nazi Paperclip scientists. In 1946, the director of the War Research Service, George W. Merck, reported the possibility of using crystalline toxins to Secretary of War Robert P. Patterson. It should be noted that the War Research Service initiated America's biological weapons program, and Merck went on to become president of the Merck & Company pharmaceutical firm. Although Merck died in 1957, his early knowledge of the disease toxin means it could have been passed along to his colleagues at Merck Pharmaceutical. That Merck was involved in such research can be seen in a NewEngland Journal of Medicine article that noted that a study of the hepatitis Β vaccine, used extensively in gay and drug-addict communities, was supported "by a grant from the Department of Virus and Cell Biology of Merck, Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, West Point, VA."
After extensive study, researchers Donald W. and William L. C. Scott concluded that those suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia are actually victims of "man-altered versions of brucellosis emanating from the 'triangle'—that is, the areas around Fort Detrick, Washington, D.C., New York City's East Side and Long Island's federal Animal Disease Center, and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory." These locations are often mentioned in biological warfare literature. Fort Detrick and Cold Spring Harbor, especially, were centers of Nazi Paperclip research activity.
According to the Scotts' report, this pathogen was tested during the summer of 1984 at Tahoe Truckee High School in California via the air duct system. Individual rooms were fitted with an independent recycling air supply system and the teachers' lounge was designated as the infection target. Within months, seven of eight teachers assigned to this room became very ill.
Tahoe Truckee High School was only one of several locations where the specially designed pathogens were tested. Some pathogens were distributed by aerosol sprays and others were spread through contaminated mosquitoes. The Scotts reported that, during the 1980s, one hundred million mosquitoes a month were bred at the Dominion Parasite Laboratory in Belleville, Ontario. From there, the mosquitoes were tested by both Canadian and U.S. military authorities after being infected with brucellosis. Some observers believe the 1999 outbreak of human encephalitis in NewYork City, due to what was designated West Nile virus, may have been the result of these infected mosquitoes.
Additionally, the Scotts also claim that unsuspecting victims were tested by both the military and CIA and monitored by the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control. Encouraged by what they thought was a successful test, military leaders reportedly passed the brucellosis bioagentto Saddam Hussein, who in the mid-1980s was fighting a protracted war against Iran with the aid of the CIA. With the approval of Vice President George H. W. Bush in 1985, Saddam received "a startling array of biological pathogens...the essential raw material for a disabling weapon." This included shipments of both Brucella abortus, biotypes 3 and 9, and Brucella melitensis, biotypes 1 and 3. These toxins continued to be sold to Saddam through May2,1986, as "shipments number 21 and 22 from [the American Type Culture Collection] ATCC in Rockville, Maryland."
In a 2005 article entitled "Molecular Terrorism," Gary Tunsky credited both the Scotts and the Nicolsons with creating a growing public awareness of the mysterious and debilitating effects of mycoplasma infection.
"Chances are if you feel sick and tired and your doctor is unable to make a definite diagnosis because lab tests, blood chemistry profiles and tissue cultures fail to reveal any disease pathogen, you might very well be infected with Mycoplasma," suggested Tunsky.
"Since Mycoplasma cannot be successfully treated with the usual short course duration of antibiotics due to their intracellular location, slow proliferation rate and inherent resistance to most antibiotics, the few Mycoplasma experts that specialize in this field are recommending six-months to one year of non-stop treatments using strong antibiotics such as Cipro and Doxycycline," he added. "However, if a patient does not want to destroy their body and immune system with Cipro and Doxycycline, a total overhaul of every cell from head to toe using a multi-faceted, non-toxic, holistic treatment approach is absolutely necessary to overcome Mycoplasma infections naturally. This is why vitamins and nutritional supplementation are so important in the therapy."
Tunsky said the reason so many Americans are caught up in a medical merry-go-round of being bounced from one doctor to the next without ever receiving a proper diagnosis is that mainstream medical doctors are not trained to find hard-to-detect pathogens. "Since mycoplasma hides intra- cellularlyand invades multiple organs and systems, it manifests a vast array of symptoms throughout the whole body, making a correct diagnosis virtually impossible for a mainstream doctor's linear, magic bullet mentality," he explained. Such inability to make a quick and simple diagnosis lies behind the mysterious malady that struck members of the U.S. military in the Persian Gulf Warof 1990-91.
GULF WAR SYNDROME
After Saddam obtaned
a stockpile of the brucellosis, it was discovered that this contagious designer bacteria had mutated and become airborne. And it was too late. According to the Scotts, Saddam used his toxins on American troops during the Persian Gulf War. This attack by mycoplasma, exacerbated by the impaired immunization systems caused by untested vaccines, the depleted uranium used in antitank shells, and oil well fires, combined in a toxic mixture resulting in the illness known as Gulf War syndrome. "Researchers could only look dumbly on when 100,000 veterans returned from the Gulf War presenting all of the brucellosis symptoms.. And the Pentagon could only take up the tried and tested myth that the veterans were not really sick at all. They only imagined they were," the Scotts explained.
Troops initially were told that no such infection existed and that the problem was mostly in their minds. But over the years, authorities were forced to admit that something had triggered severe illness in many Gulf War veterans. Curiously, French troops who served in the Gulf War did not receive the same mix of vaccines as the British and Americans and did not suffer from Gulf War syndrome. Apparently their undamaged immunization systems were able to withstand the mycoplasma attack.
A 1993 staff report to Senator Donald W. Riegle Jr., entitled "Gulf War Syndrome: The Case for Multiple Origin Mixed Chemical/Biotoxin Warfare Related Disorders," contrasts the relationship between the high rate of Gulf War illnesses among troops exposed to direct agent attacks and the much lower rates among those exposed only to the indirect fallout from coalition bombings of Iraqi chemical, biological, and nuclear targets. Because the U.S. military was not likely to reveal one of its most secret biochemical weapons or face liability by admitting that it had been sold to Saddam Hussein, the report concluded that vaccines "were to blame for the troops' illnesses." However, the report also hinted at the possibility of other causes, stating, "While other possible causes of the Gulf War Syndrome, such as petrochemical poisoning, depleted uranium exposure, and regionally prevalent diseases, have been discussed, no other explanation proves as compelling."
Although Riegle's report was completed in September 1993, it was not made available until April 1997, when the American Gulf War Veterans Association was finally able to obtain a copy. Not only were service members being forced to take untested vaccines, many veterans were not receiving adequate medical care due to missing medical records. The Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Report 103-97 issued on December 8, 1994, showed that the military medical records of 51 percent of 150 Gulf War veterans surveyed were either missing or inaccurate. Clearly, something other than mere negligence must have been at play if so many medical records were missing or inaccurate.
In 2009, Gulf War infection due to man-made mycoplasma seemed to be repeating itself. In mid-August, three Canadian soldiers were quarantined at a hospital in Quebec City, Canada, after returning from Kandahar, Afghanistan. The soldiers were infected with a drug- resistant "superbug" formally titled Acinetobacter baumannii, but dubbed by the American troops "Iraqibacter." Fearing they too may have contracted this bug, two civilian patients who were in contact with the soldiers were also isolated. "This isn't the first case we've had. We've received military patients returning from Afghanistan with this bacterium since 2007," said a hospital spokesperson. In a 2007 report, Wound Care Canada wrote that incidences of this strain have increased in U.S. military hospitals. America's CDC has issued a report stating that an increase of Acinetobacter baumannii in military hospitals treating U.S. troops serving in Iraq, Kuwait, and Afghanistan was noticed as far back as 2002.
Following the Gulf War and the misrepresentations of the government, the mycoplasma spread to the civilian population whereupon many people began suffering from debilitation and tiredness. Once it was known that the contagion was spreading into the general population, top officials with the National Institutes of Health and Centers for Disease Control as well as the Defense Department and the Department of Health and Human Resources claimed the disease was connected to the Epstein-Barr virus. They labeled it "chronic mononucleosis," and it has now become known as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Like the veterans before them, victims of this ailment initially were told it was merely a psychological condition.
Yet by 2010, the CDC had acknowledged CFS as a long-term debilitating and complex disorder characterized by profound fatigue that is not improved by bed rest and that may be worsened by physical or mental activity. The CDC estimated more than one million people in the United States are affected by the syndrome and that there are "tens of millions of people with similar fatiguing illnesses who do not fully meet the strict research definition of CFS."
One victim, Dr. Martin Lerner of William Beaumont Hospital, told his peers in the American Society of Microbiology that the mysterious disease left his heart damaged, and that he suspected that CFS was caused by viral infection. Lerner, who founded the Treatment Center for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Beverly Hills, Michigan, created the Energy Index Point Score in hopes it would become a standard measurement tool to evaluate the degree of disability for CFS patients. Lerner has connected the Epstein-Barr virus, human herpes virus-6, and cytomegalovirus and similar infections to CFS. These are the very debilitating diseases studied by Donald and William Scott, who concluded that the victims of such neurodegenerative and systemic diseases "are ill with a very real physical disease deriving from a sub-viral particle developed from the brucellosis bacterial toxin."
The idea that a man-made biological weapon may be responsible for the ill health of millions of Americans is horrifying enough. Is it possible that such a catastrophic circumstance is the result of a conscious plan by the globalists?
Researchers now believe that
virtually everyone in North America—and perhaps the world—carries the crystalline pathogen, although no symptoms will become apparent until the latter stages of some serious disease. Many conspiracy theorists believed in early 2009 that something within the swine flu vaccinations would trigger the pathogen.
Swine flu, officially a new strain of the H1N1 influenza virus, was first identified in the spring of 2009 following an outbreak in Mexico. Oddly, although the strain contains a combination of genes from swine, avian (bird), and human influenza viruses, it cannot be spread by eating pork or pork products, leading many suspicious persons to suspect that swine flu is of human manufacture.
Some theorists also believed that the spread of the health-destroying mycoplasma toxin fits well with the agenda of the wealthy elite who have long supported eugenics and have been looking for ways to cull the human herd of "useless eaters." Many cite a classified study made by the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger in 1974, entitled "National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM) 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests." This study, also known as the Kissinger Report, stated that population growth in the so-called lesser- developed countries (LDCs) represented a serious threat to U.S. national security. The study was adopted as official policy in November 1975 by unelected president Gerald R. Ford.
In a 1981 interview concerning overpopulation, former ambassador to South Vietnam and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Maxwell Taylor, after advocating population reduction through limited wars, disease, and starvation, blithely concluded, "I have already written off more than a billion people. These people are in places in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. We can't save them. The population crisis and the food-supply question dictate that we should not even try. It's a waste of time."
As if he were reading from Taylor's script, England's Prince Philip was quoted in People magazine as saying, "Human population growth is probably the single most serious long-term threat to survival. We're in for a major disaster if it isn't curbed—not just for the natural world, but for the human world. The more people there are, the more resources they'll consume, the more pollution they'll create, the more fighting they will do. We have no option. If it isn't controlled voluntarily, it will be controlled involuntarily by an increase in disease, starvation and war." Years later, Philip mused, "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
In the early 1970s, Associate Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg may have echoed the views of Ivy League intellectuals when she said she believed the Roe v.
abortion decision was predicated on the Supreme Court majority's desire to diminish "populations that we don't want to have too many of." She added that it was her expectation that the right to abortion created in Roe
"was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion."
Where did Ginsburg get the idea that American policymaking elites were interested in decreasing undesirable populations? Some researchers suggested that Ginsburg, at some point, became acquainted with the writings of John Holdren or of like-minded people in the most militant branch of the population control movement. In 1977, Holdren was a young academic who helped antinatalist guru Paul Ehrlich and his wife, Anne, write Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment.
Holdren's work states, "If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can [could] be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource- consumption patterns.." Expressing the desire for "a Planetary regime" by controlling all human economic activity and interactions with the environment, the authors suggested the "power to enforce the agreed limits" on population growth by whatever means necessary. This includes involuntary sterilization, abortion, or even mass involuntary sterilization through the infiltration of sterilizing agents into public water supplies.
Internet blogger and radio host William Norman Grigg pointed out that amid the Obama administration's efforts to impose centralized "universal" health care, John Holdren sits as Barack Obama's "science czar," in which he counsels the president on the role of science in public policy. "This relationship has a certain Strangelovian undercurrent, given Holdren's enthusiasm for eugenicist and totalitarian methods of population 'management,'" he noted.
Prolific author G. Edward Griffin, best known for his book on the Federal Reserve, The Creature from Jekyll Island, also voiced concern over Holdren's thoughts on martial law and depopulation. Noting Holdren's advocacy of forced abortions and putting sterilization chemicals in the water supply, Griffin stated that Holdren discussed the possibility of reducing the population by insidious means. "He was not concerned with the ethical or freedom issues involved with these measures, only their practicality. Now we find this same man, an academic expert on population reduction, at the right hand of the President of The United States, advocating mass vaccination against the Swine Flu using vaccines that half of the medical profession believes are unsafe.. Remember, all of those who hold power in the governments of the world today are collectivists [self- styled globalists], and the guiding rule of collectivism is that individuals and minorities must be sacrificed, if necessary, for the greater good of the state or of society. Of course, those who rule will decide what the greater good is and who is to be sacrificed," Griffin said.
This, of course, is the basic problem with population control. The idea of limiting the burgeoning Earth population is probably desirable, as the increasing number of humans as well as their waste is placing a strain on the planet. The rub comes with the question of who will decide which segments of the population must forgo childbearing for the good of the majority. So far, it is the wealthy elite— the globalists—who have taken the lead in creating ways of holding down population growth through eugenics, drugs, and birth-control measures.
Former assistant secretary of housing Catherine Austin Fitts agreed with Griffin that one of the globalists' goals is depopulation. "Perhaps it is the goal of a swine flu epidemic as well, whether bio-warfare or hype around a flu season," she warned. "I keep remembering my sense of urgency leaving the Bush administration in 1991. We had to do something to turn around the economy and gather real assets behind retirement plans and the social safety net. If not, Americans could find themselves deeply out on a limb. I felt my family and friends were in danger. They did not share my concern. They had a deep faith in the system. As my efforts to find ways of reengineering government investment in communities failed to win political support, Washington and Wall Street moved forward with a debt bubble and globalization that was horrifying in its implications for humanity.
"Overwhelmed by what was happening, I estimated the end result. My simple calculations guessed that we were going to achieve economic sustainability on Earth by depopulating down to a population of approximately 500 million people from our then current global population of 6 billion [by 2009, 7.7 billion]. I was...used to looking at numbers from a very high level. To me, we had to have radical change in how we governed resources or depopulate. It was a mathematical result."
Fitts noted than some government budget analysts have concluded that the nation can no longer afford previously assumed social safety nets like Social Security and Medicare. "That is, unless you change the actuarial assumptions in the budget—like life expectancy," she said. "Lowering immune systems and increasing toxicity levels combined with poor food, water and terrorizing stress will help do the trick. A plague can so frighten and help control people that they will accept the end of their current benefits (and the resulting implications to life expectancy) without objection. And a plague with proper planning can be highly profitable. Whatever the truth of what swine flu is or vaccines rushed into production without proper testing and peer review, it is a way to keep control in a situation that is quickly shifting out of control."
Adding to fears over
conscious efforts to involuntarily reduce the human population are growing concerns that some killer plagues are man-made. To this day, many citizens still believe that acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) was created by bioengineers working in the United States after the immigration of Nazi eugenicists. It was in 1983 that AIDS was publicly recognized as a deadly and rapidly spreading disease. When the CDC called AIDS "a peculiar biological curiosity among New York City homosexuals
," suspicion grew around the world that AIDS was the product of germ warfare experiments designed to destroy undesirables. One theory was that it was developed between 1969 and 1972 in U.S. laboratories, then released in Africa by unsuspecting WHO workers in 1975 in doses of the smallpox vaccine. It was believed by some that AIDS came to the United States in 1978 in hepatitis B vaccine laced with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
"Don't Discount Conspiracy Theories on Origins of AIDS," stated a headline in Kenya's newspaper, the Daily Nation. In a December 2009 article, it was noted that thirty- three million persons worldwide and thirteen million sub- Saharan Africans have died of AIDS. Writer Angeyo Kalambuka noted, "Soon after the US State Department published the Global 2000 Report for the President in 1980 advising that the world population must be reduced by 2 billion people by the year 2000, Thomas Ferguson of the Office of Population Affairs elaborated in the Executive International Reviewthat 'the quickest way to reduce population is through famine, like Africa, or through disease, like in the Black Death.population reduction is now our primary policy objective'."
The belief that AIDS was manufactured by the United States is supported by a record of hearings before a subcommittee of the House Committee on Appropriations in 1969.
In his testimony to the subcommittee in 1969, Dr. D. M. MacArthur, deputy director for research and technology at the Department of Defense, said, "Within the next five to ten years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease." In other words, he meant a type of germ that would neutralize the normal human immunization system. MacArthur told the congressmen that tentative plans for the development of this organism had already been drawn up between the Pentagon and the National Academy of Sciences' National Research Council and that the project would cost $10 million. Interestingly, MacArthur admitted that such a program was "highly controversial" and that there were many "who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations."
"Mycoplasmas will forever be at the heart of the U.S. biological warfare program," stated attorney Boyd Graves, a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and director of AIDS Concerns for the Common Cause Medical Research Foundation in Ontario, Canada. Graves had produced a timeline flowchart that correlated more than twenty thousand scientific papers and fifteen years of progress reports concerning a secret federal virus development program, which he claimed proves the man-made origins of AIDS. "The 1971 flowchart makes it perfectly clear. [and] provides absolute evidence of the United States' intent to kill its own citizens and others," declared Graves.
Graves told one interviewer, "No one in this U.S. government has downloaded the 1971 flowchart.. There is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion that the United States intentionally made HIV/AIDS with the purpose for use as a population control weapon; a quiet and silent holocaust of people of color, toward the development of a New World Order."
The depopulation views of Maxwell Taylor, Henry Kissinger, and others are echoes of the words from a 1996 full-page ad by Negative Population Growth, Inc. (NPG), that was published in Foreign Affairs, the official publication of the Council on Foreign Relations:
"We need a smaller population in order to halt the destruction of our environment, and to create an economy that will be sustainable [original emphasis] over the very long term. We are trying to address our steadily worsening environmental problems without coming to grips with their root cause—overpopulation. All efforts to save our environment will ultimately be futile unless we not only halt U.S. population growth, but reverse it, so that our population can eventually be stabilized at a sustainable [original emphasis] level, far lower than it is today."
According to the ad by NPG, the population level being sought by the globalists was described as "a U.S. population in the range of 125 to 150 million, or about its size in the 1940s." According to U.S. Census statistics in mid-2009, the population stood at 307,229,513. Thus, more than half the current population needs to disappear to reach the level envisioned by the globalists.
Such globalist thinking continues today. On May 5, 2009, some of America's leading billionaires met in a private Manhattan home just a week before the annual meeting of the secretive Bilderbergers in Greece. Calling themselves the "Good Club," attendees included Bill Gates, David Rockefeller Jr., Warren Buffett, George Soros, New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, and Oprah Winfrey. According to John Harlow of the Sunday Times, the group agreed with Gates that human overpopulation was a priority concern. "Another guest said there was 'nothing as crude as a vote' but a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat," wrote Harlow.
So to achieve the globalists' dream of a U.S. population of no more than 150 million, the current population would have to be halved. What's to happen to more than 150 million Americans?
Apparently, those with great wealth and power have decided to take overpopulation into their own hands. And these individuals were connected to the same families and corporations that funded communism in Russia and then National Socialism in prewar Germany.
"Today with AIDS, mad cow disease, chronic fatigue, and the rest, history is apparently repeating," noted Dr. Len Horowitz. "In fact, even the message is the same. The millions of Holocaust victims were told they were going into 'showers' for 'public health' and 'disinfection.' That's why we are being told to get vaccinated. Virtually nothing has changed, not even the message."
As an indication that nothing has substantially changed in the ruling hierarchy of the globalists, on February 8, 2009, President Barack Obama's national security adviser, General James L. Jones, opened a speech to the Forty-fifth Munich Conference on Security Policy in Germany by admitting that he takes his "daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through General Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger."
Donald and William Scott believed a high-level agenda to reduce the population went even above Henry Kissinger: "The Washington corner of the brucellosis triangle with its military, NIH, Treasury and Justice [Department] components have had their ties to and have largely taken their directions from the New York corner dominated by the Rockefeller interests. And the Rockefeller interests through the agency of the CFR [Council on Foreign Relations], the Rockefeller Institute/University, the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Chase Manhattan Bank have constituted a vast machine of power and baleful influence whose parts have meshed together in an effort to maintain that power."
One reason why more doctors don't want to look more closely at the mycoplasma pandemic may be that work in the field of microbiology appears to be hazardous to one's healthy. By mid-2009, nearly one hundred scientists around the world had died, many under suspicious circumstances. Most of them were microbiologists.
Researcher Mark J. Harper compiled a list of scientists in some way connected to the study of viruses or vaccines. "While some of these deaths may be purely coincidental and seem to pose no connection, many of these deaths are highly suspicious and appear not to be random acts of violence. Many are just plain murders," commented Harper.
While not everyone on this list died an unnatural death, the sheer number and scope is breathtaking. With this many dead, couldn't this mean that someone, somewhere, wants to get rid of those who see through the conspiracy of fraudulent pandemics and might produce effective antidotes?
A full list of these names and dates of death can be found on several Internet websites, including Mark Halper's site http ://www.pup pstheori es.co m/fo rum/i ndex.php? showtopic=6521.
DR. RIFE'S DISCOVERY
Insidiousness of control has become so pervasive that a remarkable scientist was professionally discredited and ruined for claiming to discover a cure for dangerous diseases. Today Dr. Royal Raymond Rife's suppressed technology is making a worldwide comeback despite the opposition of the medical establishment.
In the 1930s, Rife demonstrated the ability of specific radio-wave frequencies to disrupt viral and bacteria cells. Every biochemical compound, including single-cell organisms, oscillate with a unique frequency vibration. Because germs are carbon-based life forms, they are susceptible to disruption by radio frequencies. When the amplitude, or resonance, of the frequency is intensified, the cell can be shattered and destroyed. By increasing the intensity of a frequency, Rife increased the natural oscillations of one-celled bacteria and viruses until they distorted and disintegrated from structural stresses. A crude analogy to this effect is a glass shattering when a singer sounds a high note.
Rife's work with pathogens began as a result of his invention of the "Universal Prismatic Microscope," which was more effective in studying organisms than electron microscopes because those devices killed specimens by bombarding them with radiant energy. Using specially ground quartz prisms in an elongated microscope tube, Rife not only was able to view live specimens but also his view was amplified up to sixty thousand times. He became the first human to see and photograph live viruses and to note that they evolved and changed form just as other organisms.
A 1944 report from the Smithsonian Institution entitled "The New Microscope," by Dr. R. E. Seidel (report 3781), stated, "Under the Universal Microscope disease organisms such as those of cancer.. .and other disease may be observed to succumb when exposed to certain lethal frequencies.." This was strong support for claims that Rife's frequency therapy actually worked to destroy diseases.
Following decades of research, Rife isolated the frequencies of numerous disease cells, including cancer, and by broadcasting them back to the cells in an intensified form was able to shatter the original disease cell. This technology does not harm normal healthy cells or tissue. There has not been one documented case of a person harmed by a Rife-type device.
In fact, there are narratives of many successes. A Special Research Committee of the University of Southern California confirmed that Rife frequencies were reversing many ailments, including cancer. By 1934, Rife had isolated a virus that incited cancer cells and stopped it by bombarding it with radio frequencies. He was successful in killing both carcinoma and sarcoma cancers in more than four hundred tests on animals and in using his frequencies to cure sixteen cancer patients diagnosed as terminal by conventional medicine.
Soon enough, the established medical community realized that this device not only would wreck the pharmaceutical industry, but damage medical practices in general. Cures meant fewer visits to the doctor. Opposition immediately came from Dr. Thomas Rivers of the Rockefeller Institute, who had not even seen Rife's equipment in operation. Rivers claimed evolved forms of viruses did not exist. Conflict broke out between those persons who had seen viruses changing into different forms beneath Rife's microscopes and those who had not.
"Because his microscope did not reveal them, Rivers argued that there was 'no logical basis for belief in this theory [evolving forms of viruses],'" explained national radio commentator Jeff Rense. "The same argument is used today in evaluating many other 'alternative' medical treatments; if there is no precedent, then it must not be valid. Nothing can convince a closed mind. Most had never actually looked though the San Diego microscopes [of Rife] .air travel in the 1930's was uncomfortable, primitive, and rather risky. So, the debate about the life cycle of viruses was resolved i n favor of those who never saw it. Even modern electron microscopes show frozen images, not the life cycle of viruses in process,"
Overworked and underfunded, Rife and his associates were easy targets for attack. The health authorities made false claims against him, altered his test procedures so that his demonstrations would fail, and made impossible demands on him.
In 1934, Rife declined an offer to partner with Morris Fishbein, then head of the American Medical Association. "We may never know the exact terms of this offer. But we do know the terms of the offer Fishbein made to Harry Hoxsey for control of his herbal cancer remedy," reported Rense. "Fishbein's associates would receive all profits for nine years and Hoxsey would receive nothing. Then, if they were satisfied that it worked, Hoxsey would begin to receive 10% of the profits. Hoxsey decided that he would rather continue to make all the profits himself. When Hoxsey turned Fishbein down, Fishbein used his immensely powerful political connections to have Hoxsey arrested 125 times in a period of 16 months. The charges (based on practicing medicine without a license) were always thrown out of court, but the harassment drove Hoxsey insane."
Rife's troubles turned more serious. His lab was ransacked on several occasions, but no suspect was ever caught. He was also harassed by health officials. Baseless and costly lawsuits were brought against him resulting in his bankruptcy. The suits, some filed by persons with connections to pharmaceutical corporations, ultimately failed. The USC's Special Research Committee was disbanded, Rife was marginalized, and his device today is available only as a costly research instrument employed by a few doctors and private citizens. Rife died a broken man in 1971.
Although Rife's work has been confirmed by scientists and researchers outside the United States, the conventional medical community still ignores the benefits of this technology and continues to prosecute those who do. Those Americans who have confirmed or endorsed various areas of Rife's work include Dr. Edward C. Rosenow Sr., former chief of bacteriology at the Mayo Clinic; Dr. Arthur I. Kendall of Northwestern Medical School; Dr. George Dock of the Los Angeles County Medical Association library; Dr. Alvin Foord, professor of pathology at the University of Southern California; Rufus Klein-Schmidt, president of USC; Dr. Milbank Johnson, director of the Southern California AMA; Whalen Morrison, chief surgeon for the Santa Fe Railway; Dr. George Fischer of Children's Hospital, New York; Karl Meyer, with the Hooper Foundation; and many others.
Barry Lynes, a California investigative reporter, learned of the Rife story through John Crane, who had worked at Rife's side from 1950 until Rife's death in 1971. Initially skeptical of the claims of the healing benefits of Rife technology, after studying the documentation held by Crane, Lynes became outraged by the injustices that had wrecked Rife's life's work. Lynes's 1987 book on Rife and his work, entitled The Cancer Cure That Worked! Fifty Years of Suppression, became an underground favorite and sparked renewed interest in Rife's work. Starting in 1995, San Diego manufacturer James Folsom marketed and distributed Rife-type devices when he took over the Royal Rife Research Society. He claimed to have hundreds of testimonials that his devices improved physical symptoms, and in many cases led to remission in cancer. According to Folsom, he had no dissatisfied customers.
Folsom was raided by the FDA in 2003 during Operation Cure All, a campaign that targeted various companies in the alternative-health market. Although Folsom's equipment was confiscated, Folsom heard no more about it for years. But then in October 2007, just days before his vulnerability would have ended under a statute of limitations, Folsom was arrested and charged with several felonies, including selling a class III medical instrument without a license. Folsom argued he did not need a license because his equipment was a class I biofeedback device. These devices were exempt and had been used for more than seventy years with no known harm or side effects. Regardless, the FDA claimed these biofeedback devices were under its jurisdiction over medical devices under a 1976 law. That law allowed for the prosecution of selling high-voltage medical devices. However, it should be noted that Folsom's machine at that time could be powered by a nine-volt battery.
Despite being offered a plea bargain that would allow him to plead guilty to a misdemeanor and make him pay a $250 fine and suffer one year of unsupervised probation, Folsom decided to go to trial.
According to U.S. Attorney Karen Hewitt, Folsom's business generated more than $8 million in revenue over its years in operation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Melanie Pierson said the case was the largest involving illegal medical devices that she had seen in twenty years working as a prosecutor in San Diego County.
The trial was held in U.S. District Court, where no discussion of the effectiveness of the Rife's technology was allowed. Originally, Folsom wanted to produce stacks of testimonials from satisfied customers but Melanie Pierson objected. Folsom then tried to assert that for more than seventy years, no harmful effects had been documented from the devices. This too was not allowed. Folsom then tried to argue that none of his customers had been dissatisfied, but to no effect. Aside from prosecutors and government officials, the only witnesses at the trial were twenty-four of Folsom's friends and fellow device distributors. They unanimously testified to Folsom's good character and clean business practices. Incredibly, the prosecution used this testimony against Folsom, claiming that, in fact, Folsom was such a brilliant fraud that even his peers and customers weren't aware they'd been defrauded. Prosecutors claimed Folsom used the false name "Jim Anderson" to avoid being caught by the FDA, and that he gave buyers the false impression that the FDA had approved the devices for "investigational purposes." Folsom admitted he had used the name as a salesman at a different company but had used his real name on all official and government correspondence.
In February 2009, a U.S. federal jury in San Diego convicted Folsom of twenty-six felony counts for selling Rife devices under the name of "Nature-tronics," "AstroPulse," "Biosolutions," "Energy Wellness," and "Global Wellness." Folsom, sixty-eight, faced more than 140 years in prison, literally a life sentence at his age, and $500,000 in fines. He is being held in the federal government's Western Region Detention Facility in San Diego, now managed by the private firm GEO Group, Inc.
A few weeks after Folsom's trial and conviction, the FDA issued a news release announcing that manufacturers of twenty-five types of medical devices marketed prior to 1976 must submit safety and effectiveness information to the agency so that it may evaluate the risk level for each device type. Supporters of Folsom said the FDA's decision to scrutinize such preexisting technology was most likely the result of his trial.
One Folsom supporter stated, "Jim stood on his principles for his innocence and to clear the Rife name. It was an impossible task. Jim was up against an endless supply of money through the FDA and an unjust system. Research has found since Jim's conviction that our judicial system is more of a money machine than Big Pharma & the Medical Industrial Complex."
Observers saw Folsom's conviction as a blow against those supporting Rife technology. They also predicted that those interested in the technology would have to go to foreign websites such as http://www.rife.de/, a site in Germany where the sales and use of Rife-type devices are legal.
With the FDA seeking to require prescriptions for everyday vitamins and suppressing potentially useful medical technologies like Rife's, not to mention the new government-controlled national health-care plan, it would appear as though there is a conscious effort to prevent the public from acquiring healthful alternatives to chemical drugs.
But why would the government harm us with untested vaccines and the suppression of potentially healthful therapies? Wouldn't such actions also adversely affect the health of the global elite? Some researchers believe the answer may be that the inner-core globalists already utilize such technology or something even more advanced. Is it possible they can cure themselves of the same illnesses they allow to be inflicted on others? The globalist elites may not be worried that their eugenics plans will touch their families. They may believe they can protect their own DNA with race-specific pathogens. If they should contact some dire affliction, might they easily eliminate it with just a few short hours of frequency technology or advanced antidotes for immunization—therapies cloaked from the general population.
The possibility of holding such publicly denied therapies that might end disease and halt or regress the aging process would prove a most effective enticement in the recruitment of minions to aid in the advancement of their globalist agendas.
DRUGGING THE POPULATION
There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away
from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.
—Aldous Huxley, 1961
Drugs are big business. Only five biopharmaceutical companies—Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Medlmmune, the Australian firm CSL, and Sanofi-Pasteur—have been awarded massive contracts by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to develop and produce more than 195 million doses of swine flu vaccine. This is in addition to the seasonal flu vaccine.
According to Dr. Joseph Mercola, an osteopathic physician and author of sixteen books on health and alternative medicine, including two NewYork Times bestsellers, "CSL has contracts to supply $180 million worth of bulk antigen to the U.S. Medlmmune will supply 40 million doses of its live attenuated nasal spray swine flu vaccine for more than $450 million. And Sanofi-Pasteur is providing more than 100 million doses of monovalent swine flu vaccine, a $690 million order."
About half of the world's largest pharmaceutical corporations are not American, but rather European. Among the top ten pharmaceutical companies are the American companies Pfizer, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Wyeth (formerly American Home Products). The rest of the top pharmaceutical companies are the British companies GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca; the Swiss companies Novartis and Roche; and the French company Aventis (which in 2004 merged with another French company, Sanafi Synthelabo, putting it in third place). These corporations essentially function alike, but their drug prices in America are much higher than in other nations' markets. For example, a bottle of one thousand aspirin costs less in Mexico than a bottle of five hundred across the border in the United States and, obviously, no company will sell a product without making a profit.
To give some indication of the money involved in the modern drug business, the legal pharmaceutical market totaled $712 billion globally in 2007, of which about $80 billion was for psychiatric drugs. According to several authorities, including Harvard psychiatrist Dr. Peter R. Breggin; Bruce Wiseman, national president of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights; geneticist Dr. Thomas Roeder; Dr. Hyla Cass, a former assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at UCLA School of Medicine; and David Healey and David B. Menkes, both of the North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine, psychiatric drugs may be the culprit behind many homicides, suicides, and school shootings.
Even worse, the $80 billion doesn't even include the illegal drug market. A former editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Marcia Angell, wrote in the NewYorkReviewofBooks, "The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion). Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself."
In her 2004 book The Truth About the Drug Companies: HowThey Deceive Us and What to Do About It, Dr. Angell argues that the current power of the pharmaceutical industry can be directly traced to the industry's phenomenal growth during the Reagan years, with George H. W. Bush and his globalist supporters in command following Reagan's wounding during an assassination attempt in March 1981.
"The watershed year was 1980," she noted. "Before then, it was a good business, but afterward, it was a stupendous one. From 1960 to 1980, prescription drug sales were fairly static as a percent of US gross domestic product, but from 1980 to 2000, they tripled. They now stand at more than $200 billion a year. Of the many events that contributed to the industry's great and good fortune, none had to do with the quality of the drugs the companies were selling."
The success of Big Pharm has more to do with marketing than with the effectiveness of its drugs. Dr. Michael Wilkes, professor of medicine and vice dean for medical education at the University of California, Davis, joined other critics in describing a recent phenomenon called "disease-mongering," an activity in which large drug corporations attempt to convince healthy people they are sick and need drugs in order to boost sales.
"Most pharmaceutical companies devote huge amounts of money to prevent, control and cure diseases," he added. "When their profits don't match corporate expectations, they 'invent' new diseases to be cured by existing drugs."
"Countless examples of disease-mongering are driven by the pharmaceutical industry's drive to sell drugs," wrote Dr. Wilkes. "Conditions such as female sexual dysfunction syndrome, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, toenail fungus, baldness and social anxiety disorder (a.k.a. shyness) are a few places where the medical community has stepped in, thereby turning normal or mild conditions into diseases for which medication is the treatment."
Ironically, though Big Pharm invents new diseases, they rarely invent a new drug. Surprisingly, most new and important drugs brought to market in recent years were based on taxpayer-funded research at universities, small biotechnology companies, or the National Institutes of Health (NIH). In fact, most supposedly "new" drugs are merely a variation of older drugs.
"If I'm a manufacturer and I can change one molecule and get another twenty years of patent rights, and convince physicians to prescribe and consumers to demand the next form of Prilosec, or weekly Prozac instead of daily Prozac, just as my patent expires, then why would I be spending money on a lot less certain endeavor, which is looking for brand-new drugs?" asked Dr. Sharon Levine, associate executive director of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Group.
"What's true of the eight-hundred-pound gorilla is true of the colossus that is the pharmaceutical industry. It is used to doing pretty much what it wants to do," wrote Dr. Marcia Angell. "The most important of these laws [that relax restrictions on pharmaceutical corporations] is known as the Bayh-Dole Act, after its chief sponsors, Senator Birch Bayh (D-Ind.) and Senator Robert Dole (R-Kans.). Bayh- Dole enabled universities and small businesses to patent discoveries emanating from research sponsored by the National Institutes of Health, the major distributor of tax dollars for medical research, and then to grant exclusive licenses to drug companies. Until then, taxpayer-financed discoveries were in the public domain, available to any company that wanted to use them. But now universities, where most NIH-sponsored work is carried out, can patent and license their discoveries, and charge royalties. Similar legislation permitted the NIH itself to enter into deals with drug companies that would directly transfer NIH discoveries to industry.. Thus, when a patent held by a university or a small biotech company is eventually licensed to a big drug company, all parties cash in on the public investment in research."
Under this system, research paid for by public money became a commodity to be sold for profit by privately owned companies. Dr. Angell provides examples of the large consulting fees paid by pharmaceutical corporations to individual faculty members and to NIH scientists and directors. These fees allow for globalist pharmaceutical corporations to further intrude into the nation's medical education.
The lucrative connection between Big Pharm and medical schools and hospitals has brought about a definite corporate-friendly atmosphere. "One of the results has been a growing pro-industry bias in medical research [in both schools and hospitals]—exactly where such bias doesn't belong," stated Dr. Angell.
She noted that the huge amounts of money flowing from Big Pharm began to change the ethos of medical schools and teaching hospitals. Such nonprofit institutions began to view themselves as partners of industry. Faculty researchers were encouraged to obtain patents on their work, which were then assigned to their universities. The schools then sold the right to Big Pharm and shared in royalties. Many medical schools and teaching hospitals even created technology transfer offices to capitalize on faculty discoveries.
Dr. Angell also noted the excessive salaries for pharmaceutical executives. Take, for instance, the whopping $74,890,918 salary paid to Charles Heimbold Jr. in 2001, the former chairman and CEO of Bristol-Myers Squibb. This does not count his $76,095,611 worth of unexercised stock options. At the same time, the chairman of Wyeth made $40,521,011 in 2001, not counting his $40,629,459 in stock options.
Selling is the name of the game. Drug advertising is now ubiquitous in all major media outlets. Despite spending 7.1 percent less on direct-to-consumer (DTC) drug advertising in the third quarter of fiscal 2008, a Nielsen Media Research report showed that pharmaceutical firms still spent about $4.8 billion on DTC advertising for television, radio, and print ads in magazines and newspapers.
Here's how the top few drugs worked out in sales per advertising dollar spent:
The cholesterol drug Lipitor earned $34.09 for each ad dollar spent. The asthma drug Advair Diskus earned $27.98 per ad dollar.
The heartburn remedy Nexium earned $44.92 per ad dollar.
The allergy drug Singulair earned $45.24 per ad dollar.
The allergy medication Zyrtec (now available without prescription) earned $33.86 per ad dollar.
DTC advertising more than tripled between 1997 and 2005, growing from $1.3 billion to $4.2 billion since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration eased restrictions governing these types of drug ads.
It has been estimated that $8 billion of the $235 billion spent by consumers on prescription drugs in 2008 came from DTC advertising. And the 2008 decline in DTC advertising—a first in recent U.S. history—was offset by launch campaigns on drugs such as Cialis, Abilify, Nasonex, and Plavix.
While TV ads show visuals of happy people, idyllic countrysides, laughing children, and playful pets, a droning audio voice rapidly skips through possible side effects. The pain medication Vioxx was heavily advertised by its maker but later recalled when it was shown the drug increased the risk of heart attack in some people. "The fact that it was so heavily marketed magnified its ultimate damage," said Michael Russo, a health-care proponent for the public advocacy group California Public Interest Research Group (CalPIRG).
Perhaps Big Pharm cares more for promoting their drugs than developing something better and safer. Published estimates predict that whereas the drug industry spent about $57.5 billion on U.S. marketing in 2004, it spent only $31.5 billion on research and development. Percentage-wise, of the $235.4 billion in U.S. sales in 2004, promotion consumed 24.4 percent of sales dollars while R&D only took 13.4 percent.
"Although some academic studies suggest that DTC advertising can help people who need to start taking drugs and others to remain compliant with existing treatment regimens, the lack of fair balance in many DTC ads that promote drug benefits and downplay risks is what is driving legislation to curb its use," stated a comment posted on BioJobBlog.com, a website dedicated to bioindustry employment. ".Interestingly, about ten years ago, a friend who works for a major pharmaceutical company told me that she always waits five years before using a newly approved drug. At the time, I thought it was an odd thing for her to say since she had been in the business for over 15 years. However, over the past five years or so, several high-profile drugs that were heavily promoted by DTC advertising had to be withdrawn from the market. To that end, while DTC advertising may be 'great for business,' it may not always be in the best interest of American consumers who use prescriptions."
The site also noted that DTC advertising is allowed in only two countries—New Zealand and the United States.
The ever-increasing predominance of DTC drug advertising has prompted several members of Congress to introduce legislation to curtail the ads. Legislators were disgusted with tax deductions for drug marketers using DTC advertising and commercials offering products that gave four-hour erections during prime-time television hours.
Not only did drug advertising trouble the public, but so did the disproportion of actual drug costs to retail sale price. In 2003, the website ThePeoplesVoice.org posted this chart of the actual price of active ingredients used in some of the most popular drugs sold in America.