Frederick warne and co., And new york. To the reader



Download 0.91 Mb.
Page1/22
Date17.04.2016
Size0.91 Mb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   22
THE KORAN:
COMMONLY CALLED THE
ALKORAN OF MOHAMMED.
Translated into English from the Original Arabic,
WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES TAKEN FROM THE MOST

APPROVED COMMENTATORS.
TO WHICH IS PREFIXED
A PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE,
BY GEORGE SALE.

LONDON:


FREDERICK WARNE AND CO.,

AND NEW YORK.

TO THE READER.
_______
I IMAGINE it almost needless either to make an apology for publishing the following translation, or to go about to prove it a work of use as well as curiosity. They must have a mean opinion of the Christian religion, or be but ill grounded therein, who can apprehend any danger from so manifest a forgery: and if the religious and civil institutions of foreign nations are worth our knowledge, those of Mohammed, the lawgiver of the Arabians, and founder of an empire which in less than a century spread itself over a greater part of the world than the Romans were ever masters of, must needs be so; whether we consider their extensive obtaining, or our frequent intercourse with those who are governed thereby. I shall not here inquire into the reasons why the law of Mohammed has met with so unexampled a reception in the world (for they are greatly deceived who imagine it to have been propagated by the sword alone), or by what means it came to be embraced by nations which never felt the force of the Mohammedan arms, and even by those which stripped the Arabians of their conquests, and put an end to the sovereignty and very being of their Khal”fs: yet it seems as if there was something more than what is vulgarly imagined in a religion which has made so surprising a progress. But whatever use an impartial version of the Kor‰n may be of in other respects, it is absolutely necessary to undeceive those who, from the ignorant or unfair translations which have appeared, have entertained too favourable an opinion of the original, and also to enable us effectually to expose the imposture; none of those who have hitherto undertaken that province, not excepting Dr. Prideaux himself, having succeeded to the satisfaction of the judicious, for want of being complete masters of the controversy. The writers of the Romish communion, in particular, are so far from having done any service in their refutations of Mohammedism, that by endeavouring to defend their idolatry and other superstitions, they have rather contributed to the increase of that aversion which the Mohammedans in general have to the Christian religion, and given them great advantages in the dispute. The Protestants alone are able to attack the Kor‰n with success; and for them, I trust, Providence has reserved the glory of its overthrow. In the meantime, if I might presume to lay down rules to be observed by those who attempt the conversion of the Mohammedans, they should be the

same which the learned and worthy Bishop Kidder* has prescribed for the conversion of the Jews, and which may, mutatis mutandis, be equally applied to the former, notwithstanding the despicable opinion that writer, for want of being better acquainted with them, entertained of those people, judging them scarce fit to be argued with. The first of these rules is, To avoid compulsion; which, though it be not in our power to employ at present, I hope will not be made use of when it is. The second is, To avoid teaching doctrines against common sense; the Mohammedans not being such fools (whatever we may think of them) as to be gained over in this case. The worshipping of images and the doctrine of transubstantiation are great stumbling-blocks to the Mohammedans, and the Church which teacheth them is very unfit to bring those people over. The third is, To avoid weak arguments: for the Mohammedans are not to be converted with these, or hard words. We must use them with humanity, and dispute against them with arguments that are proper and cogent. It is certain that many Christians, who have written against them, have been very defective this way: many have used arguments that have no force, and advanced propositions that are void of truth. This method is so far from convincing, that it rather serves to harden them. The Mohammedans will be apt to conclude we have little to say, when we urge them with arguments that are trifling or untrue. We do but lose ground when we do this; and instead of gaining them, we expose ourselves and our cause also. We must not give them ill words neither; but must avoid all reproachful language, all that is sarcastical and biting: this never did good from pulpit or press. The softest words will make the deepest impression; and if we think it a fault in them to give ill language, we cannot be excused when we imitate them. The fourth rule is, Not to quit any article of the Christian faith to gain the Mohammedans. It is a fond conceit of the Socinians, that we shall upon their principles be most like to prevail upon the Mohammedans: it is not true in matter of fact. We must not give up any article to gain them: but then the Church of Rome ought to part with many practices and some doctrines. We are not to design to gain the Mohammedans over to a system of dogma, but to the ancient and primitive faith. I believe nobody will deny but that the rules here laid down are just: the latter part of the third, which alone my design has given me occasion to practise, I think so reasonable, that I have not, in speaking of Mohammed or his Kor‰n, allowed myself to use those opprobrious appellations, and unmannerly expressions, which seem to be the strongest arguments of several who have written against them. On the contrary, I have thought myself to treat both with common decency, and even to approve such


* In his Demonstr. of the Messias, Part III. chap. 2.

particulars as seemed to me to deserve approbation: for how criminal soever Mohammed may have been in imposing a false religion on mankind, the praises due to his real virtues ought not to be denied him; nor can I do otherwise than applaud the candour of the pious and learned Spanhemius, who, though he owned him to have been a wicked impostor, yet acknowledged him to have been richly furnished with natural endowments, beautiful in his person, of a subtle wit, agreeable behaviour, showing liberality to the poor, courtesy to every one, fortitude against his enemies, and above all a high reverence for the name of GOD; severe against the perjured, adulterers, murderers, slanderers, prodigals, covetous, false witnesses, &c., a great preacher of patience, charity, mercy, beneficence, gratitude, honouring of parents and superiors, and a frequent celebrator of the divine praises.*

Of the several translations of the Kor‰n now extant, there is but one which tolerably represents the sense of the original; and that being in Latin, a new version became necessary, at least to an English reader. What Bibliander published for a Latin translation of that book deserves not the name of a translation; the unaccountable liberties therein taken and the numberless faults, both of omission and commission, leaving scarce any resemblance of the original. It was made near six hundred years ago, being finished in 1143, by Robertus Retenensis, an English-man, with the assistance of Hermannus Dalmata, at the request of Peter, Abbot of Clugny, who paid them well for their pains.

From this Latin version was taken the Italian of Andrea Arrivabene, notwithstanding the pretences in his dedication of its being done immediately from the Arabic;  wherefore it is no wonder if the transcript be yet more faulty and absurd than the copy.à

About the end of the fifteenth century, Johannes Andreas, a native of Xativa in the kingdom of Valencia, who from a Mohammedan doctor became a Christian priest, translated not only the Kor‰n, but also its glosses, and the seven books of the Sonna, out of Arabic into the Arragonian tongue, at the command of Martin Garcia,¤ Bishop of Barcelona and Inquisitor of Arragon. Whether this translation were ever published or not I am wholly ignorant: but it may be presumed to have been the better done for being the work of one bred up in the
* Id certum, naturalibus egregi dotibus instructum Muhammedera, forma pr¾stanti, ingenio calido, moribus facetis, ac pr¾ se ferentem liberalitatem in egenos. comitatem in singulos, fortitudinem in hostes, ac pr¾ c¾teris reverentiam divini nominis.ÐSeverus fuit in perjuros, adulteros, homicidas, obtrectatores, prodigos, avaros, falsos testes, &c. Magnus idem patienti¾, charitatis, misericordi¾, beneficenti¾, gratitudinis, honoris in parentes ac superiores pr¾co, ut et divinarum laudum. Hist. Eccles. Sec. VII. c. 7, lem. 5 and 7.

  His words are: Questo libro, che giˆ havevo ˆ commune utilitˆ di molti fatto dal proprio testo Arabo tradurre nella nostra volgar lingua Italiana, &c. And afterwards; Questo  lÕAlcorano di Macometto, il quale, come ho gia detto, ho fatto dal suo idioma tradurre, &c.

à Vide Jos. Scalig. Epist. 361 et 362; et Selden. de Success. ad Leges Ebr¾or. p. 9.

¤ J. Andreas, in Pr¾f. ad Tractat. suum de Confusione Sect¾ Mahometan¾.

Mohammedan religion and learning; though his refutation of that religion, which has had several editions, gives no great idea of his abilities.

Some years within the last century, Andrew du Ryer, who had been consul of the French nation in Egypt, and was tolerably skilled in the Turkish and Arabic languages, took the pains to translate the Kor‰n into his own tongue: but his performance, though it be beyond comparison preferable to that of Retenensis, is far from being a just translation; there being mistakes in every page, besides frequent transpositions, omissions, and additions,* faults unpardonable in a work of this nature. And what renders it still more incomplete is, the want of Notes to explain a vast number of passages, some of which are difficult, and others impossible to be understood, without proper explications, were they translated ever so exactly; which the author is so sensible of that he often refers his reader to the Arabic commentators.

The English version is no other than a translation of Du RyerÕs, and that a very bad one; for Alexander Ross, who did it, being utterly unacquainted with the Arabic, and no great master of the French, has added a number of fresh mistakes of his own to those of Du Ryer; not to mention the meanness of his language, which would make a better book ridiculous.

In 1698, a Latin translation of the Kor‰n, made by Father Lewis Marracci, who had been confessor to Pope Innocent XI., was published at Padua, together with the original text, accompanied by explanatory notes and a refutation. This translation of MarracciÕs, generally speaking, is very exact; but adheres to the Arabic idiom too literally to be easily understood, unless I am much deceived, by those who are not versed in the Mohammedan learning. The notes he has added are indeed of great use; but his refutations, which swell the work to a large volume, are of little or none at all, being often unsatisfactory, and sometimes impertinent. The work, however, with all its faults, is very valuable, and I should be guilty of ingratitude, did I not acknowledge myself much obliged thereto; but still, being in Latin, it can be of no use to those who understand not that tongue.

Having therefore undertaken a new translation, I have endeavoured to do the original impartial justice; not having, to the best of my knowledge, represented it, in any one instance, either better or worse than it really is. I have thought myself obliged, indeed, in a piece which pretends to be the Word of GOD, to keep somewhat scrupulously close to the text; by which means the language may, in some places, seem to express the Arabic a little too literally to be elegant English: but this, I hope, has not happened often; and I flatter myself that the
* Vide Windet. de Vit‰ Functorum statu, Sect. IX.

style I have made use of will not only give a more genuine idea of the original than if I had taken more liberty (which would have been much more for my ease), but will soon become familiar: for we must not expect to read a version of so extraordinary a book with the same ease and pleasure as a modern composition.

In the Notes my view has been briefly to explain the text, and especially the difficult and obscure passages, from the most approved commentators, and that generally in their own words, for whose opinions or expressions, where liable to censure, I am not answerable; my province being only fairly to represent their expositions, and the little I have added of my own, or from European writers, being easily discernible. Where I met with any circumstance which I imagined might be curious or entertaining, I have not failed to produce it.

The Preliminary Discourse will acquaint the reader with the most material particulars proper to be known previously to the entering on the Kor‰n itself, and which could not so conveniently have been thrown into the Notes. And I have taken care, both in the Preliminary Discourse and the Notes, constantly to quote my authorities and the writers to whom I have been beholden; but to none have I been more so than to the learned Dr. Pocock, whose Specimen Histori¾ Arabum is the most useful and accurate work that has been hitherto published concerning the antiquities of that nation, and ought to be read by every curious inquirer into them.

As I have had no opportunity of consulting public libraries, the manuscripts of which I have made use throughout the whole work have been such as I had in my own study, except only the Commentary of al Beid‰wi and the Gospel of St. Barnabas. The first belongs to the library of the Dutch church in Austin Friars, and for the use of it I have been chiefly indebted to the Reverend Dr. Bolten, one of the ministers of that church: the other was very obligingly lent me by the Reverend Dr. Holme, Rector of Hedley in Hampshire; and I take this opportunity of returning both those gentlemen my thanks for their favours. The merit of al Beid‰wiÕs commentary will appear from the frequent quotations I have made thence; but of the Gospel of St. Barnabas (which I had not seen when the little I have said of it in the Preliminary Discourse,* and the extract I had borrowed from M. de la Monnoye and M. Toland,  were printed off), I must beg leave to give some further account.

The book is a moderate quarto, in Spanish, written in a very legible hand, but a little damaged towards the latter end. It contains two hundred and twenty-two chapters of unequal length, and four hundred


* Sect. IV. p. 58.   In not. ad cap. 3, p. 38

and twenty pages; and is said, in the front, to be translated from the Italian, by an Arragonian Moslem, named Mostafa de Aranda. There is a preface prefixed to it, wherein the discoverer of the original MS., who was a Christian monk, called Fra Marino, tells us that having accidentally met with a writing of Iren¾us (among others), wherein he speaks against St. Paul, alleging, for his authority, the Gospel of St. Barnabas, he became exceeding desirous to find this gospel; and that GOD, of His mercy, having made him very intimate with Pope Sixtus V., one day, as they were together in that PopeÕs library, his Holiness fell asleep, and he, to employ himself, reaching down a book to read, the first he laid his hand on proved to be the very gospel he wanted: overjoyed at the discovery, he scrupled not to hide his prize in his sleeve, and on the PopeÕs awaking, took leave of him, carrying with him that celestial treasure, by reading of which he became a convert to Mohammedism.

This Gospel of Barnabas contains a complete history of Jesus Christ from His birth to His ascension; and most of the circumstances in the four real Gospels are to be found therein, but many of them turned, and some artfully enough, to favour the Mohammedan system. From the design of the whole, and the frequent interpolations of stories and passages wherein Mohammed is spoken of and foretold by name, as the messenger of God, and the great prophet who was to perfect the dispensation of Jesus, it appears to be a most barefaced forgery. One particular I observe therein induces me to believe it to have been dressed up by a renegade Christian, slightly instructed in his new religion, and not educated a Mohammedan (unless the fault be imputed to the Spanish, or perhaps the Italian translator, and not to the original compiler); I mean the giving to Mohammed the title of Messiah, and that not once or twice only, but in several places; whereas the title of the Messiah, or, as the Arabs write it, al Mas”h, i.e., Christ, is appropriated to Jesus in the Kor‰n, and is constantly applied by the Mohammedans to Him, and never to their own prophet. The passages produced from the Italian MS. by M. de la Monnoye are to be seen in this Spanish version almost word for word.

But to return to the following work. Though I have freely censured the former translations of the Kor‰n, I would not therefore be suspected of a design to make my own pass as free from faults: I am very sensible it is not; and I make no doubt that the few who are able to discern them, and know the difficulty of the undertaking, will give me fair quarter. I likewise flatter myself that they, and all considerate persons, will excuse the delay which has happened in the publication of this work, when they are informed that it was carried on at leisure times only, and amidst the necessary avocations of a troublesome profession.


CONTENTS.
_________

A TABLE
OF THE
SECTIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE
_________

SECTION Page



I.ÐOf the Arabs before Mohammed; or, as they express it, in the Time of

Ignorance; their History, Religion, Learning, and Customs 1

II.ÐOf the State of Christianity, particularly of the Eastern Churches, and of

Judaism, at time of MohammedÕs appearance; and of the methods taken

by him for the establishing his Religion, and the circumstances which

concurred thereto 25

III.ÐOf the Kor‰n itself, the Peculiarities of that Book; the manner of its being

written and published, and the General Design of it 44

IV.ÐOf the Doctrines and positive Precepts of the Kor‰n which relate to Faith and

Religious Duties 54

V.ÐOf certain Negative Precepts in the Kor‰n 95

VI.ÐOf the Institutions of the Kor‰n in Civil Affairs 103

VII.ÐOf the Months commanded by the Kor‰n to be kept Sacred; and of the setting

apart of Friday for the especial service of God 114

VIII.ÐOf the principal Sects among the Mohammedans; and of those who have pre-

tended to Prophecy among the Arabs, in or since the time of Mohammed 117

A TABLE OF THE CHAPTERS


OF
THE KORAN.

______________

CHAPTER Page



1. Entitled, The Preface, or Introduction; containing 7 verses 1

2. Entitled, The Cow; containing 286 verses 2

3. Entitled, The Family of Imr‰n; containing 200 verses 32

4. Entitled, Women; containing 175 verses 53

5. Entitled, The Table; containing 120 verses 73

6. Entitled, Cattle; containing 165 verses 89

7. Entitled, Al Araf; containing 206 verses 105

8. Entitled, The Spoils; containing 76 verses 125

9. Entitled, The Declaration of Immunity; containing 139 verses 134

10. Entitled, Jonas; containing 109 verses 150

11. Entitled, Hud; containing 123 verses 158

12. Entitled, Joseph; containing 111 verses 169

13. Entitled, Thunder; containing 43 verses 181

14. Entitled, Abraham; containing 52 verses 186

15. Entitled, Al Hejr; containing 99 verses 191

16. Entitled, The Bee; containing 128 verses 195

17. Entitled, The Night Journey; contianing 110 verses 206

18. Entitled, The Cave; containing 111 verses 216

19. Entitled, Mary; containing 80 verses 227

20. Entitled, T. H.; containing 134 verses 233

21. Entitled, The Prophets; containing 112 verses 242

22. Entitled, The Pilgrimage; containing 78 verses 250

23. Entitled, The True Believers; containing 118 verses 257

24. Entitled, Light; containing 74 verses 262

25. Entitled, Al Forkan; containing 77 verses 271

26. Entitled, The Poets; containing 227 verses 276

27. Entitled, The Ant; containing 93 verses 283

28. Entitled, The Story; containing 87 verses 289

29. Entitled, The Spider; containing 69 verses 297

30. Entitled, The Greeks; containing 60 verses 302

31. Entitled, Lokm‰n; containing 34 verses 306

32. Entitled, Adoration; containing 29 verses 309

33. Entitled, The Confederates; containing 73 verses 312

34. Entitled, Saba; containing 54 verses 321

35. Entitled, The Creator; containing 45 verses 326

36. Entitled, Y. S; containing 83 verses 330

CHAPTER Page



37. Entitled, Those who rank themselves in Order; containing 182 verses 334

38. Entitled, S.; containing 86 verses 339

39. Entitled, The Troops; containing 75 verses 344

40. Entitled, The True Believer; containing 85 verses 350

41. Entitled, Are distinctly explained; containing 54 verses 355

42. Entitled, Consultation; containing 53 verses 359

43. Entitled, The Ornaments of Gold; containing 89 verses 362

44. Entitled, Smoke; containing 57 verses 367

45. Entitled, The Kneeling; containing 36 verses 369

46. Entitled, Al Ahkaf; containing 35 verses 371

47. Entitled, Mohammed; containing 38 verses 374

48. Entitled, The Victory; containing 29 verses 377

49. Entitled, The Inner Apartments; containing 18 verses 381

50. Entitled, K.; containing 45 verses 383

51. Entitled, The Dispersing; containing 60 verses 385

52. Entitled, The Mountain; containing 48 verses 387

53. Entitled, The Star; containing 61 verses 389

54. Entitled, The Moon; containing 55 verses 391

55. Entitled, The Merciful; containing 78 verses 394

56. Entitled, The Inevitable; containing 99 verses 396

57. Entitled, Iron; containing 29 verses 399

58. Entitled, She who disputed; containing 22 verses 402

59. Entitled, The Emigration; containing 24 verses 404

60. Entitled, She who is tried; containing 13 verses 407

61. Entitled, Battle Array; containing 14 verses 409

62. Entitled, The Assembly; containing 11 verses 410

63. Entitled, The Hypocrites; containing 11 verses 412

64. Entitled, Mutual Deceit; contianing 18 verses 413

65. Entitled, Divorce; containing 12 verses 414

66. Entitled, Prohibition; containing 12 verses 415

67. Entitled, The Kingdom; containing 30 verses 418

68. Entitled, The Pen; containing 52 verses 419

69. Entitled, The Infallible; containing 52 verses 421

70. Entitled, The Steps; containing 44 verses 423

71. Entitled, Noah; containing 28 verses 424

72. Entitled, The Genii; containing 28 verses 426



Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   22




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page