Disasters by Discipline 1 : necessary dialogue for emergency management education



Download 277.66 Kb.
Page3/4
Date conversion16.05.2016
Size277.66 Kb.
1   2   3   4

Conclusion

We are at a pivotal moment in the evolution of this discipline/field/area: where do we go from here? Our actions must be deliberative and mindful, incorporating “lessons learned” from the emergence of other academic enterprises.


Can we identify the “drivers” that might move us through a comparable series of phases as described in the introduction? Such a picture might include:

  • The impact of research centers and individual researchers in producing the “scholarship of discovery.”

  • The impact of the first and second assessments, with the latter identifying useful theories and perspectives for potential classroom and practical application.

  • The impact of the FEMA Higher Education project, its annual conferences, web site, courses, and textbook(s).

  • The impact of EMI and its independent study courses; assessment of this effort and its impact would be valuable.

  • Efforts like the World Congress Blueprint on Education or the Organization of American States’ Hemispheric Eduplan, largely yet to be acknowledged or integrated.

  • Individual writings on EM education, scattered throughout a limited number of journals.

What other potential drivers are needed? Among those I have recommended:



  • A thorough, “second assessment” type of review of the state of EM education with task forces on theory, methods, practice and the core curriculum, not to mention the question of the canon.

  • Curriculum analysis linked to curriculum transformation projects.

  • Exploration of theory and methods for EM education and practice.

  • Development of a national council or association of EM educators.

    • With a web site of resources including annotated bibliographies, book reviews, syllabi, projects, handouts, list serves.

    • A faculty role statement usable within individual institutions for faculty evaluation and to justify faculty activities.

    • Lobbying of publishers to produce a full line of textbooks and anthologies appropriate for both the undergraduate and graduate levels.

  • More conferences, including online interactions to provoke and continue dialogue.

  • Journal sections dedicated exclusively to EM education.

  • Funding for EM education, scholarships, textbooks and more.

  • Integration of EM educators into efforts like the National Science Foundation engineering research centers.

One of the greatest outcomes of the organizing and outreach in women’s studies has been the impact of more diverse perspectives, especially the impact of global understanding. Throughout this paper, I have noted the tendency to emphasize U.S. contexts in curricula, textbooks, and research. As we pursue our “difficult dialogues” during this conference, I urge all of us to “think globally” while acting locally in our own countries, our own universities, and our own programs.


Because what we do makes a difference in actual human lives, in property loss……we should proceed with deliberative dialogue But proceed we must. Engage.

References


American Association of Colleges of Nursing. 2003. “Position statement on defining scholarship for the discipline of nursing.” http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Publications/positions/scholar.htm. Accessed September 1, 2003.
Blanchard, B. Wayne. 2003. “Outlines of competencies to develop successful 21st century hazard or disaster or emergency or hazard risk managers.” Presentation at the Natural Hazards Workshop, Boulder, Colorado.
Cutter, Susan L., editor. 2001. American Hazardscapes. Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.
Dawson, Gregg. 1993. “A comparison of research and practice: a practitioner’s view.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 15 (2): 55-62.
Enarson, Elaine et al. 2003. “A social vulnerability approach to disasters.” FEMA Emergency Management Institute Higher Education Project.
Enarson, Elaine and Brenda Phillips. 2004. “Feminist Theory for Research and Practice.” Forthcoming in Brenda Phillips and Betty Morrow, editors. Women and Disasters. International Research Committee on Disasters: Xlibris.com
Falkiner, Leanna. 2003. Inventory of Disaster Management Education in Major Canadian Universities. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction/Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection and Emergency Preparedness.
Fischer, Henry W. 2003. “Distance Learning Programs.” Contemporary Disaster Review Volume 1, #2. http://muweb.millersville.edu/~cdr/CDR_1.2.pdf
Fothergill, Alice. 2000. “Knowledge transfer between researchers and practitioners.” Natural Hazards Review 1/2: 91-98.
Freier, Paolo. 1997. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. NY: The Continuum Publishing Company.
Garbarino, James. 1982. Children and Families in the Social Environment. NY: Aldine.
Guy-Sheftall, Beverly. 1992. “The Status of Women’s Studies.” Consultant Report to the Ford Foundation.
hooks, bell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: education as the practice of freedom. NY: Routledge.
Kincaid, J. Peter. 1999. “Research and analysis methods in emergency management.” FEMA Emergency Management Institute Higher Education Project.
Lerner, Gerda. 1997. Why History Matters: life and thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lopes, Rocky. 2001. “Editorial: partnerships for disaster education.” Natural Hazards Review 2/3: 102-104.
Mileti, Dennis. 1999. Disasters by Design. Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Neal, David M. 1997. “Reconsidering the Phases of Disaster.” International

Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 15 (2): pp 239-264.
Neal, David M. 2000. “Developing degree programs in disaster management: some reflections and observations.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 18/3: 417-437.
Neal, David M. 2003. “Teaching introduction to disasters: comparing classroom and virtual environments.” Emergency Preparedness Applied Research Center Preliminary Paper #2. Available from the author, neal@jsucc.jsu.edu.
National Academies. 2003. “The Emergency Manager of the Future.” Conference Proceedings, Disaster Roundtable, June 13, 2003. http://www.nas.edu.
Nichols, James. O. 1991. A Practitioner’s Handbook for Insitutional Effectiveness and Student Outcomes Assessment Implementation. New York: Agathon Press.
Organization of American States, Natural Hazards Project. http://www.oas.org/nhp.
Quarantelli, E.L. 1993. “Converting disaster scholarship into effective disaster planning and managing: possibilities and limitations.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 11/1: 15-39.
Quarantelli, E.L. and Russell R. Dynes. 1977. “Response to social crisis and disaster.” American Review of Sociology 3: 23-49.
Rosenfelt, Deborah S. 1997. “Definitive issues: women’s studies, multicultural education, and curriculum transformation in policy and practice in the United States.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 3&4: pp. 26-41.
Shaw, Greg and Jack Harrold. 2004. “Identification of the core competencies required of executive level business crisis and continuity managers.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 1/1, Article 1. http://www.bepress.com/jhsem.
Stallings, Robert A., Editor. 2002. Methods of Disaster Research. International Research Committee on Disasters: Xlibris.Com.
Tierney, Kathleen J., Michael K. Lindell and Ron W. Perry. 2001. Facing the Unexpected. Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.
Tierney, Kathleen J., William J. Petak and Harlan Hahn. 1988. Disabled Persons & Earthquake Hazards. Boulder, CO: Institute for Social and Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center.

1   2   3   4


The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2016
send message

    Main page