trial court erred

This opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reportsThis opinion is subject to further editing and modification. The final version will appear in the bound volume of the official reports
36.77 Kb. 1
read
Jennifer m. Lukemeyer jeffrey a. ModisettJennifer m. Lukemeyer jeffrey a. Modisett
Georgopulos’ tendered instruction concerning the consequences of a verdict of guilty but mentally ill; and (2) did the trial court err in sentencing Georgopulos by relying on improper aggravating factors and not giving proper weight to
35.58 Kb. 1
read
Not to be published in official reportsNot to be published in official reports
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b)
105.31 Kb. 3
read
Not to be publishedNot to be published
California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b)
32.07 Kb. 1
read
Preserving error for appellate reviewPreserving error for appellate review
List issues for individual venire member and group discussions in jury selection?
0.87 Mb. 15
read
Not to be published in official reportsNot to be published in official reports
California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b)
24.3 Kb. 1
read
Precedents Kinsella V. Jaekle (ctsc 1984)Precedents Kinsella V. Jaekle (ctsc 1984)
The questions were combined under Kinsella v. Jaekle. Lower courts denied the request to quash the subpoena of the cochairmen and delayed deciding the other matters
29.1 Kb. 1
read
Not to be publishedNot to be published
California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b)
20.75 Kb. 1
read
Demerath V. Knights of columbus, 268 NeDemerath V. Knights of columbus, 268 Ne
Larry r. Demerath, appellant, V. Knights of columbus, a foreign insurance company, appellee
88.76 Kb. 1
read
Deficient sample, incomplete testDeficient sample, incomplete test
The defendant also attempted to force the State to elect whether to charge the defendant with a dui aggravated by a breath test result higher than. 15, or a dui aggravated by a refusal
31.8 Kb. 1
read
The state of texasThe state of texas
Defendant is criminally responsible as the primary actor or as a party for committing each essential element of the crime alleged in the charging instrument and each lesser-included offense thereto
110.04 Kb. 1
read
Hypothetically correct community caretaking functionHypothetically correct community caretaking function
The majority sets a dangerous precedent here by basically saying that an ofcr may investigate a person’s harmless activities without observing any danger or distress
49.03 Kb. 1
read
United states court of appeals tenth circuit united states of americaUnited states court of appeals tenth circuit united states of america
We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 1291 and 18 U. S. C. § 3742, and affirm
30.9 Kb. 1
read
Certified for publicationCertified for publication
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Yvette M. Palazuelos, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded, with directions
117.58 Kb. 3
read

  1   2   3


The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2016
send message

    Main page