state court
 | The following paper clearly shows that the infamous Roe v. Wade decision Law of God to which all of man's laws are subsidiary in the moral order; else, anarchy reigns! – Gary L. Morella 96.73 Kb.  1 | read |
 | Recent Decision on the California Mental Health Parity Law: Health Plans Must Cover All Medically Necessary Treatment 15.63 Kb. 1 | read |
| Corporations and Elections: a century of Debate Before the 1970s, only about 10 cases were brought under state and federal laws; nearly twice as many have been brought since then. Also, Bellotti was the first such case to reach the U. S 287.08 Kb. 3 | read |
| Filed united States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 26, 2006 Jay L. Schniederjan, Assistant Attorney General (W. A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General, with him on the brief), Office of the Attorney General of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for Respondent-Appellee 125.04 Kb. 1 | read |
| Time warner entertainment company, L. P. et al V. Six flags over georgia, llc et al States Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our opinion, and remanded the case to us for further consideration in light of an opinion it issued on May 14, 2001 419.72 Kb. 7 | read |
| American Federalism Assignments A. Diagram: Three Major Systems of Government B. Pros and Cons: federalism Define three ways of ordering relations between a central government and regional or local governments 71.83 Kb. 1 | read |
| 247 S. E. 2d 114 146 Ga. App. 560 Echols The appellant, Darnell Echols, sued the appellee, DeKalb County to recover back wages which he claimed he was due. The trial judge granted summary judgment to DeKalb County, and this appeal followed 29.87 Kb. 1 | read |
| Probate of an Indian Decedent’s Trust, Personal, and Real Property This article sets out how aipra governs the probate process for trust or restricted land1 and then describes the established, if complicated, system of probate for an Indian decedent’s non-trust land personal and real property 88.4 Kb. 1 | read |
 | The Supreme Court Moot Court Part 1 A. Facts of the Case The State Court of Appeals held that the law was constitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment says the states have the obligation to uphold the privileges of citizens (due process) 17.17 Kb. 1 | read |
1 2