district court erred

199 F. 3d 281, *; 2000 U. S. App. Lexis 215, table of contents199 F. 3d 281, *; 2000 U. S. App. Lexis 215, table of contents
U. S. 1066; 121 S. Ct. 2216; 150 L. Ed. 2d 209; 2001 U. S. Lexis 4163; 69 U. S. L
1.43 Mb. 19
read
Lexsee 2007 usapp lexis 22130Lexsee 2007 usapp lexis 22130
Anton wheeler, faculty member Yale Law School; convervator stephen wizner, faculty member Yale Law School; john g. Simon, faculty member Yale Law School; michael j. Wishnie, faculty member Yale Law School, Plaintiffs-Appellees, V
74.09 Kb. 1
read
United states court of appeals tenth circuit united states of americaUnited states court of appeals tenth circuit united states of america
U. S. C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). He was sentenced to 64 months imprisonment followed by three years supervised release and was fined $3,000
19.21 Kb. 1
read
Filed united States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 26, 2006Filed united States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 26, 2006
Jay L. Schniederjan, Assistant Attorney General (W. A. Drew Edmondson, Attorney General, with him on the brief), Office of the Attorney General of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma for Respondent-Appellee
125.04 Kb. 1
read
For educational use onlyFor educational use only
Preferability of Raising Effectiveness Issue on Post-Conviction Motion. Most Cited Cases
227.43 Kb. 1
read
Filed united States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 31, 2006Filed united States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit October 31, 2006
Bobbie Bayless of Bayless & Stokes, Houston, Texas, (Michael Paul Kirschner and Lorrie A. Corbin of Kirschner, Kisner, Lee, pllc, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, also on the briefs), for Appellant
37.96 Kb. 1
read
Question presentedQuestion presented
Sentencing Guidelines, the court of appeals correctly applied a de novo standard of review and correctly concluded as a matter of law that the district court in this case departed downward on the basis of invalid factors
31.28 Kb. 1
read
Us-ct-app-9, [79-1 ustc ¶9142]Us-ct-app-9, [79-1 ustc ¶9142]
Us-ct-app-9, [79-1 ustc ¶9142], Alan S. Davis, M. L. Randolph, Fred E. Trotter and H. C. Eichelberger, Trustees under the Will of the Estate of James Campbell, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellees, V
38.17 Kb. 1
read
United states court of appeals for the tenth circuit philip condon fisherUnited states court of appeals for the tenth circuit philip condon fisher
Ystem, inc.; Universal press syndicate, inc.; Sears, roebuck and company; montgomery ward & company; kacey fine furniture; soundtrack; fingerhut corporation; best buy company; tyson foods
40.64 Kb. 1
read
Seth swirsky V. Mariah careySeth swirsky V. Mariah carey
We also conclude that the district court erred in ruling portions of plaintiffs' song to be unprotectable by copyright as a matter of law. We accordingly reverse the summary judgment
46.92 Kb. 1
read

  1   2


The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2016
send message

    Main page