Brown v. Board of Education Opinion (Excerpt)



Download 4.27 Kb.
Date conversion19.05.2016
Size4.27 Kb.
Brown v. Board of Education Opinion (Excerpt)

Segregation with the sanction of law, therefore, has a tendency to [retard] the educational and mental development of negro children and to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racial[ly] integrated school system. Whatever may have been the extent of psychological knowledge at the time of Plessy v. Ferguson, this finding is amply supported by modern authority. Any language in Plessy v. Ferguson contrary to this finding is rejected.

We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. This disposition makes unnecessary any discussion whether such segregation also violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Questions:
1) What do lines 8 and 9 say about the law in regards to Plessy?

2) What do the words “inherently unequal” in line 12 mean? Do you think that this “inequality” is also present in other areas of society, not just education? Explain your answer



Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/347/483#writing-USSC_CR_0347_0483_ZO


The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2016
send message

    Main page