Bibliography – stcse students‘ and Teachers‘ Conceptions and Science Education Full Version fv09. rtf / March 23, 2009



Download 4.57 Mb.
Page46/76
Date31.05.2016
Size4.57 Mb.
1   ...   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   ...   76

Morrison, J. A., Roth McDuffie, A. R., & Akerson, V. L. (2005). Preservice teachers' developement and implementation of science performance assessment tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 379-406 // g8, CTL, CSC.

Mortensen, M., & Smart, K. (2007). Free-choice worksheets increase students' exposure to curriculum during museum visits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1389-1414 // g7, INFORMAL.

Mortimer, E. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science & Education, 4(3), 267-285 // g1,CC.

Mortimer, E., Carvalho, A. de. (1996). Describing conceptual evolution in the classroom as conceptual profile change: An example from the theory of matter. In M. Michelini, Jona, S. , Cobai, D. (Ed.), Teaching the science of condensed matter and new materials (pp. 415-429). Udine: Forum // g6,P,AT.

Mortimer, E. (1998). Multivoicedness and univocality in classroom discourse: An example from theory of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 67-82 // g1,SCON,VYGOTSKY,g7,P,AT,DISCOURSE,LPRO.

Mortimer, E., Scott, P. (2000). Analysing discourse in the science classroom. In R. Millar, Leach, J. , Osborne, J. (Ed.), Improving science education (pp. 126-142). Buckingham: Open University Press // g1,DISCOURSE,g5,g7,C,LPRO.

Mortimer, E., Flávia, M. T. S. (2003). Changing referential perspective in science classroom discourse. In D. Psillos, Kariotoglou, P., Tselfes, V., Hatzikraniotis, E., Fassoulopoulos, G., Kallery, M. (Ed.), Science education research in the knowledge-based society (pp. 69-78). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers // g1, SCON, VYGOTSKY, BAKHTIN, g5, g7, P, T, VIDEO, LPRO.

Mortimer, E. F. (1993). Conceptual evolution as epistemological profile's change. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University (distributed electronically) // g1,g6,P,AT.

Mortimer, E. F. (1994). The evolution of students' explanations for physical state of matter as a change in their conceptual profile. In P. L. Lijnse (Ed.), European research in Science Education - Proceedings of the first Ph. D. Summerschool (pp. 281-287). Utrecht: CD-ß Press, Centrum voor ß-Didactiek // g6,P,M.

Mortimer, E. F., Machado, A. H. (1999). Mediational tools and discourse interactions in science classrooms. In M. Komorek, Behrendt, H. , Dahncke, H. , Duit, R. , Graeber, W. , Kross, A. (Ed.), Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future Vol.1 (pp. 181-184). Kiel: IPN Kiel // g6,DISCOURSE.

Mortimer, E. F., Machado, A. H. (2000). Anomalies and conflicts in classroom discourse. Science Education, 84(4), 429-444 // g1,PIAGET,SCON,VYGOTSKY,g7,P,AT.

Mortimer, E. F., Teixera Santos, F. M. (2001). Changing referential perspective in science classroom discourse. In D. Psillos, Kariotoglou, P. , Tselfes, V. , Bisdikian, G. , Fassoulopoulos, G. , Hatzikraniotis, E. , Kallery, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society, Vol. 1 (pp. 131-133). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki // g1,SCON,g7,C,DISCOURSE,VIDEO.

Moscovici, H. (2007). Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the most powerful of all? A self-study analysis of power relationships in science methods courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1370-1388 // g8, CTL, AFF.

Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D. , Robb, J. (2001). Examing student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771-790 // g6,CSC,LPRO.

Moss, D. M. (2003). A window on science: Exploring the JASON project and student conceptions of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(1), 21-30 // g7, NOS.

Mothes, H. (1956). Wie werden Naturerscheinungen vom Kinde selbst gedeutet ? Zeitschrift fuer Naturlehre und Naturkunde, 4, 54-57 // g1,g6.

Moussouri, T. (2001). Out-of-school science learning for children and their families. In D. Psillos, Kariotoglou, P. , Tselfes, V. , Bisdikian, G. , Fassoulopoulos, G. , Hatzikraniotis, E. , Kallery, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society, Vol. 1 (pp. 78-85). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki // g6,B,BIODIV,INFORMAL,GEN.

Muckenfuss, H. (1988). Wie praezise duerfen physikalische Begriffe sein, damit Schueler sie noch verstehen ? Der Mathematische und Naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 41(7), 397-406 // g4,g7,P,E.

Muckenfuss, H. (1993). Der Sinngehalt von Alltagsvorstellungen. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht Physik, 4(16), 16-23 // g7,P,E.

Mueller, A., Euler, M. (1999). Physics learning and the computer. Review, meta-analysis and perspectives. In M. Komorek, Behrendt, H. , Dahncke, H. , Duit, R. , Graeber, W. , Kross, A. (Ed.), Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future Vol.1 (pp. 241-243). Kiel: IPN Kiel // g6,MMEDIA,P.

Mueller, M. P., & Bentley, M. L. (2007). Beyond the ''decorated landscapes'' of educational reform: Toward landscape of pluralism in science education. Science Education, 91(2), 321-338 // g1.

Mueller, R., Wiesner, H. . (1997). Vorstellungen von Lehramtsstudenten zur Interpretation der Quantenmechanik - Ergebnisse von Befragungen. In H. Behrendt (Ed.), Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie. Probleme und Perspektiven (pp. 382-384). Alsbach: Leuchtturm-Verlag // g6,P,Q,.

Mueller, R., Wiesner, H. (2001). Das Muenchner Unterrichtskonzept zur Quantenmechanik: Erste empirische Ergebnisse. In R. Brechel (Ed.), Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie, L21 - Vortraege der Tagung fuer Didaktik der Physik / Chemie in Berlin, September 2000 (pp. 342-344). Alsbach: Leuchtturm-Verlag // g6,P,Q.

Mueller, U. (1992). Lernen als Funktion des Vorwissens. Sachunterricht und Mathematik in der Primarstufe, 20(10), 428-436 // g6,P,O.

Mueller-Lichtenfeld, H., Muenzninger, W. (1999). "Metalle veraendern sich" - Auswertung eines Bedeutungsaushandlungsprozesses zum Thema Oxidation von Metallen. Chimica didactica, 25(1), 5-22 // g4, g6, C.

Muenzinger, W. (1989). "Wenn Blei enstanden ist, dann ist es Reduktion von Bleioxid". chimica didactica, 15, 5-25 // g5,g6,C,GEN.

Muenzinger, W., Bergerhoff, F. , Krumm, B. (1990). Missverstehen und Verstehen bei Lehr-/Lernprozessen im Chemieunterricht. In K. H. Wiebel (Ed.), Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie: Probleme und Perspektiven. Vortraege auf der Tagung fuer Didaktik der Physik/Chemie in Kassel, September 1989 (pp. 187-189). Alsbach: Leuchtturm // g5.

Muganyizi Kaino, L. (2008). Technology in learning: Narrowing the gender gap? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), 263-268 // g7, GEN, AFF.

Mulder, C., Ellermeijer, T. (2001). Is there a place in investigation for computer-based modelling. In D. Psillos, Kariotoglou, P. , Tselfes, V. , Bisdikian, G. , Fassoulopoulos, G. , Hatzikraniotis, E. , Kallery, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society, Vol. 2 (pp. 563-565). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki // g7,MMEDIA,MODELLING.

Mulhall, P., McKittrick, B. , Gunstone R. (2001). A perspective on the resolution of confusions in the teaching of electricity. Research in Science Education, 31(4), 575-587 // g6,P,E.

Mulhall, P., & Gunstone, R. (2008). Views about physics held by physics teachers with differing approaches to teaching physics. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 435-462 // g8, CSC.

Mulholland, J., Wallace, J. (2000). Beginning primary science teaching: Entryways to different worlds. Research in Science Education, 30(2), 155-172 // g1,CON,g8,CTL,LPRO.

Mulholland, J., Wallace, J. (2003). Crossing borders: learning and teaching primary science in the pre-service to in-service transition. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 879-898 // g8, CTL.

Mulholland, J., & Ginns, I. S. (2008). College MOON project Australia: Preservice teachers learning about the moon's phases. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 385-399 // g8, P, AS.

Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790 // g8, CTL, PCK.

Müller, A., & Becker, H.-J. (2006). Kognitive Zustandsanalysen von Kindern nach chemischen Verstehensprozessen in außerschulischen Handlungssituationen. In A. Pitton (Ed.), Lehren und Lernen mit neuen Medien (Vol. 26, pp. 123-125). Münster: LIT Verlag // g6, C.

Müller, C., Duit, R. (2004). Funktionen des Experiments: Vorstellungen von Lehrern und Unterrichtsrealität. In A. Pitton (Ed.), Chemie- und physikdidaktische Forschung und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung Band 24 (pp. 33-35). Münster: LIT Verlag // g8, CTL, LAB, gp, P, VIDEO.

Müller, C. T., & Duit, R. (2004). Die unterrichgtliche Sachstruktur als Indikator für Lernerfolg - Analyse von Sachstrukturdiagrammen und ihr Bezug zu Leistungsergebnissen im Physikunterricht. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 10, 147-161 // g7, gp, P.

Muller, D. A., & Sharma, M. D. (2007). Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote concepiual change. Science Education, 92(2), 278-296 // g1, COSC, CON, CC, g7, P, M, FORCE, MMEDIA.

Müller, R., Wiesner, H. (2003). Evaluation des Münchener Unterrichtskonzept zur Quantenmechanik. In A. Pitton (Ed.), Außerschulisches Lernen in Physik und Chemie Band 23 (pp. 243-245). MÜNSTER: LIT // g7, P, Q.

Mullet, E., Montcouquiol, A. (1988). Archimedes' effect, information integration and individual differences. International Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 285-301 // g6,P,M.

Mullet, E., Gervais, H. (1990). Distinction between the concepts of weight and mass in high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 217-226 // g6,P,M.

Munby, H., Russell, T. (1992). Transforming chemistry research into chemistry teaching: the complexities of adopting new frames for experience. In T. Russell, Munby, H. (Ed.), Teachers and teaching (pp. 90-108). London, New York, Philadelpia: The Falmer Press // g8,CTL.

Munby, H., Russell, T. (1998). Epistomology and context in research on learning to teach science. In B. J. Fraser, Tobin, K. G. (Ed.), International handbook of Science Education, Part 2 (pp. 643-666). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers // g9.

Munby, H., Cunningham, M. , Lock, C. (2000). School science culture: A case study of barriers to developing professional knowledge. Science Education, 84(2), 193-211 // g8,CTL,LPRO.

Munby, H., Taylor, J., Chin, P., & Hutchinson, N. (2007). Co-op students' access to shared knowledge in science-rich workplaces. Science Education, 91(1), 115-132 // g1, SCON, INFORMAL, g7, B.

Muralidhar, S. (1988). Solid water is denser than liquid water: Students' experiences of science lessons in Fiji. Research in Science Education, 18, 276-282 // g6,g8,P,M,AT.

Muralidhar, S. (1993). The role of multiple data sources in interpretive Science Education research. International Journal of Science Education, 15(4), 445-455 // g5.

Murcia, K., Schibeci, R. (1999). Primary student teachers´ conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1123-1140 // g8,CSC.

Murdock, J. (2008). Comparison of curricular breadth, depth, and recurrence and physics achievement of TIMSS population 3 countries. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1135-1157 // g6, P,.

Murmann, L., Schwedes, H. (1999). Learning processes concerning "light and shadow" during Science Education in elementary school. In M. Komorek, Behrendt, H. , Dahncke, H. , Duit, R. , Graeber, W. , Kross, A. (Ed.), Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future Vol.1 (pp. 110-112). Kiel: IPN Kiel // g7,P,O,LIGHT,LPRO.

Murmann, L., Schwedes, H. (1999). Physiklernen im Sachunterricht, Vorstellungsentwicklung zum Thema Schatten und Licht. In R. Brechel (Ed.), Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie, Probleme und Perspektiven - Vortraege auf der Tagung fuer Didaktik der Physik / Chemie in Essen, Sept. 1998 (pp. 167-169). Alsbach: Leuchtturm-Verlag // g6,P,O,LIGHT.

Murmann, L. (2005). Denkwelten vom Kopf auf die Füße stellen. In A. Pitton (Ed.), Relevanz fachdidaktischer Forschungsergebnisse für die Lehrerbildung (Vol. 25, pp. 262-264). Münster: LIT Verlag // g1, CON.

Murphy, P., Schofield, B. (1984). Science at age 13. Leeds: Assessment for Performance Unit // g6.

Murphy, P., Lunn, S. (2001). Understanding practice: Teachers' views of learning and knowledge in science. In D. Psillos, Kariotoglou, P. , Tselfes, V. , Bisdikian, G. , Fassoulopoulos, G. , Hatzikraniotis, E. , Kallery, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society, Vol. 2 (pp. 569-572). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki // g8,CTL,CSC.

Murphy, P. (2005). Young people's perspectives on genetics, identity and society using film and discussion. In H. E. Fischer (Ed.), Developing standards in research on science education (pp. 165-170). London: Taylor & Francis Group // g7, B, GENETIC, BIOTECHNOLOGY.

Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2008). The role of knowledge, beliefs, and interest in the conceptual change process: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the research. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 583-616). New York: Routledge // g1, CC, AFF, g6, g7.

Murray, B., Stark, R. (1999). Pre-service primary teachers' understanding of electricity: Using concept mapping as a research tool. In M. Komorek, Behrendt, H. , Dahncke, H. , Duit, R. , Graeber, W. , Kross, A. (Ed.), Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future Vol.2 (pp. 492-494). Kiel: IPN Kiel // g8,P,E.

Murray, D. L. (1983). Misconceptions of osmosis. In H. Helm, Novak, J. D. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Seminar "Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics" (pp. 428-433). Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University // g6,B,P,M.

Murray, D. L., Bowbal, D. (1987). Constructing a conceptual framework for solving a problem. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2. Int. Seminar "Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics", Vol. II (pp. 348-359). Ithaca: Cornell University // g6,B.

Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2005). The student review of the science curriculum. School Science Review, 87(318), 83-93 // g6, CTL.

Musheno, B. V., Lawson, A. E. (1999). Effects of learning cycle and traditional text on comprehension of science concepts by students at differing reasoning levles. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 23-38 // g7,B,LEARNING CYCLE.

Muthukrishna, N., Carnine, D. , Grossen, B. , Miller, S. (1993). Children's alternative frameworks: Should they be directly addressed in science instruction? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 233-248 // g6,P,AS,.

Mutimucuio, I. (1993). Students' thinking and learning in science. Alternative ideas of the concept of energy. University of London: King's College London // g6,P,E.

Mutimucuio, I., Berg, E. van den. (1995). Conceptions of energy of students in Mozambique. Paper presented at the First European Conference on Research in Science Education, Leeds, UK, April 7.-11. , 1995 // g6,P,T,EN.

Mutimucuio, I. V. (1998). Improving students´ understanding of energy. Amsterdam: VU HuisDrukkerij, Amsterdam // g1,CON,CC,g6,g7,P,EN.

Mutonyi, H., Nielsen, W., & Nashon, S. (2007). Building scientific literacy in HIV/AIDS education: A case study of Uganda. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1363-1386 // g7, B, STS.

Myers, J., Alvermann, D. (1998). A critical postmodernist perspective on the vignettes of conceptual change. In B. Guzzetti, Hynd, C. (Ed.), Perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 183-198). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates // g1,CC.

Mysliwiec, T. H. (2003). The genetic blues: Understanding genetic principles using a practical approach and a historical perspective. The American Biology Teacher, 65(1), 41-46 // g7, B, GENETICS.

Mysliwiec, T. H. (2003). Understanding genetic principles using a practical approach & a historical perspective. The American Biology Teacher, 65(1), 41-46 // g7, B, GENETICS.

Nachmias, R., Stavy, R. , Avrams, R. (1990). A microcomputer-based diagnostic system for identifying students' conception of heat and temperature. International Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 123-132 // g5,g6,P,T.

Nachtigall, D. (1979). Physikunterricht und die Entwicklung von Denkstrukturen. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht - Physik/Chemie, 27, 65-74 // g1.

Nachtigall, D. (1981). The pre-Newtonian concept of motion in the minds of students. Paper presented at the Conference on Methods of Teaching Physics, 11.- 13. November 1981, Khom Kaen University, Thailand // g6,g8,P,M,.

Nachtigall, D. (1982). Vorstellungen von Fuenftklaesslern ueber den freien Fall. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht - Physik/Chemie, 30(3), 91-97 // g6,P,M,.

Nachtigall, D. (1985). Misconceptions in physics and a strategy to overcome them. In P. L. Lijnse (Ed.), The many faces of teaching and learning mechanics in secondary and tertiary education (pp. 296-302). Utrecht: GIREP/SVO/UNESCO // g6,g7,P,M.

Nachtigall, D. (1986). Die Rolle von Praekonzepten beim Lehren und Lernen von Physik. In W. Bleichroth (Ed.), Aufsaetze zur Didaktik der Physik. Sonderheft physica didactica 13 (pp. 97-101) // g1.

Nachtigall, D. (1986). Vorstellungen im Bereich der Mechanik. Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht - Physik/Chemie, 34(13), 114-118 // g6,P,M.

Nachtigall, D. (1990). What is wrong with physics teachers' education ? European Journal of Physics, 11, 1-14 // g9.

Nachtigall, D. (1991). Ueber das "Verstehen" von Physik. In H. Wiesner (Ed.), Aufsaetze zur Didaktik der Physik II. Festschrift zum 65. Geburtstag von Walter Jung (pp. 159-172). Bad Salzdetfurth: Franzbecker // g1.

Nachtigall, D. (1992). Was lernen unsere Schueler im Physikunterricht? Physikalische Blaetter, 48(3), 169-173 // g1.

Nachtigall, D. (1992). Zum Verstehen von Physik im Unterricht. Physik in der Schule, 30(1), 10-13 // g1.

Nachtigall, D. K. (1992). Basic elements of a modern approach to physics teachers' education. In D. K. Nachtigall, Bartsch, H. , Scholz, C. (Ed.), International Conference on Physics Teachers' Education. Proceedings (pp. 158-176). Dortmund: University of Dortmund // g1,g7,P.

Nagy, M. H. (1948). The child's theories concerning death. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 73, 3-27 // g5,g6,B.

Nagy, M. H. (1953). Children's birth theories. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 83, 217-226 // g6,B.

Nagy, M. H. (1953). Children's conceptions of some bodily functions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 83, 199-216 // g6,B.

Nagy, M. H. (1953). The representation of "germs" by children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 83, 227-240 // g6,B.

Nagy, P. (1983). Assessing cognitive structure: A response to Stewart. Science Education, 67, 25-36 // g5.

Nagy, P. (1984). The representation of cognitive structures. Toronto: The Ontario Institue for Studies in Education // g5.

Nagy-Shadman, E., & Desrochers, C. (2008). Student response technology: Empirically grounded or just a gimmick? International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 2023-2066 // g7, MMEDIA.

Nakhleh, M. (1993). Students' models of the matter in the context of acid-base chemistry. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University (distributed electronically) // g6,C.

Nakhleh, M. (2004). Middle school students' beliefs about matter. Paper presented at the NARST Conference 2004, VANCOUVER // g6, P, AT, T.

Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196 // g6,P,AT,C.

Nakhleh, M. B., Krajcik, J. S. (1993). A protocol analysis of the influece of technology on students' actions, verbal commentary, and thought processes during the performance of acid-base titrations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1149-1168 // g6,C,.

Nakhleh, M. B., Krajcik, J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base, and pH concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1077-1096 // g6,C.

Nakhleh, M. B., Samarapungavan, A. (1999). Elementary school children´s beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 777-805 // g6,P,C,AT.

Nakhleh, M. B., Samarapungavan, A., Saglam, Y. (2005). Middle school students' beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 581-612 // g6, P, AT.

Nakhleh, M. B., Polles, J., & Malina, E. (2002). Learning chemistry in a laboratory environment. In J. Gilbert, O. de Jong, R. Justi, D. F. Treagust & J. van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 69-94). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers // g1, C, LAB.

Nardi, A. (1993). Mind fields: Negotiating shared meanings via concept maps. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University (distributed electronically) // g5.

Nardi, R. (1991). Campo de forca: Subs dios historicos e psicogen ticos para a construcao do ensino desse conceito. Sao Paulo: Universidade de Sao Paulo // g1,g3,g6,P,E,MAG,FLD,CTL.

Narode, R. (1976). Cataloque of misconceptions from introductory mechanics: A personal account. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Department of Physics and Astronomy // g6,P,M.

Nash, J. G., Liotta, L. J. , Bravaco, R. J. (2000). Measuring conceptual change in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(3), 333-337 // g7,C.

Nashon, S. M. (2004). The nature of analogical explanations: High school physics teachers use in Kenya. Research in Science Education, 34(4), 475-502 // g1, ANA, gp.

Natadze, R. G. (1957). The mastery of scientific concepts in school. In b. Simon, Simon, J. (Ed.), Educational psychology in the USSR (pp. 192-197). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul // g6,B.

Naughton, W., Schreck, J., & Heikkinen, H. (2008). Seeking evidence for ''Curricular relevancy'' within undergraduate, liberal arts chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(2), 174-196 // g6 C, STS, TXT.

Naujack, B., Komorek, M. , Duit, R. (1997). Mikrounterricht ueber Fraktale. In H. Behrendt (Ed.), Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie. Probleme und Perspektiven (pp. 301-303). Alsbach: Leuchtturm-Verlag // g7,P,FRACTAL.

Naujack, B., Katscher, T. , Komorek, M. , Duit, R. (1997). Studien zur Vermittlung des Fraktalbegriffs. In F. D. d. P. Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft (Ed.), Didaktik der Physik (pp. 294-299). Berlin: Technische Universitaet Berlin, Institut fuer Fachdidaktik Physik und Lehrerbildung // g6,g7,P,FRACTAL,LPRO.

Naumer, H. (1975). "Elektronenwolke "oder "Orbital" ? Praxis der Naturwissenschaften - Chemie, 24, 197-207 // g4.



Share with your friends:
1   ...   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   ...   76




The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2020
send message

    Main page