Assess the importance of anti-communism in shaping the policies of the United States towards Indochina between 1954 and 1965



Download 7.33 Kb.
Date conversion25.05.2016
Size7.33 Kb.
Assess the importance of anti-communism in shaping the policies of the United States towards Indochina between 1954 and 1965.
Anti-communism was an important factor influencing US foreign policy throughout the Vietnam War. During the 1950s, it was the dominant factor. However, by the 1960s, it was just one of a number of reasons the US chose to pursue the war.
South Vietnam was a creation of the United States – brought into being by the Eisenhower Administration with the sole intention of preventing Ho Chi Minh from seizing all of Vietnam. At that time, world politics were seen entirely in the context of the Cold War – the ideological, political, economic and military struggle between the capitalist and communist worlds. As such, Ho Chi Minh was seen by the US as an instrument of Soviet aggression, rather than a nationalist leader with strong domestic support. The US became convinced that a Vietminh victory would unleash a wave of communist revolutions across Asia – a view known as the Domino Theory. It remained a persistent theme in American decision-making throughout the Vietnam War.

Given this anti-communist fear, the US provided economic, political and military support to Ngo Dinh Diem’s regime throughout the 1950s. Nevertheless, these efforts proved ineffective; the Viet Cong grew in strength, and by 1961 its forces were threatening the very existence of South Vietnam. Having devoted so much energy and so many resources to protecting its interests in this region, the Kennedy Administration was reluctant to accept defeat. Such an outcome would mean a significant loss of face, reducing the ability of the US to defend its interests in other, more vital, parts of the world. This so-called ‘demonstration effect’ explains why Kennedy sent 16,000 US advisers to South Vietnam, despite having reservations about the importance of the region to America’s interests.

President Johnson faced a similar dilemma when he assumed office following Kennedy’s death in 1963. The US advisers had failed to stabilise the South. If anything, their presence only played into the Viet Cong’s hands, allowing them to portray the conflict as a struggle against foreign intervention. The situation continued to deteriorate until August 1964, when North Vietnamese gunboats fired on the USS Maddox, in retaliation against US raids on North Vietnam. Johnson portrayed the attack as unprovoked aggression, and had Congress pass the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, giving him the power to wage war as he saw fit.

Recently released tapes from the Oval Office make it clear that Johnson too had doubts about the importance of defending South Vietnam. However, he was very concerned that America might look weak if it failed to back its ally. As he put it, years later: “If I left that war and let the communists take over South Vietnam, then I would be seen as a coward and my nation would be seen as an appeaser, and we would both find it impossible to accomplish anything for anybody anywhere on the entire globe.”

Johnson was also concerned that his Republican opponents might exploit the conflict in Vietnam for political advantage, portraying him as weak in the face of communist aggression. He decided to silence them by initiating a bombing campaign against the North, allegedly in retaliation for the attack on the Maddox. This helped secure him the election in 1964, but it did not secure the South. In January 1965, Johnson’s advisers recommended a round-the-clock bombing campaign against the North – Operation Rolling Thunder – as a means of persuading Ho Chi Minh to end his support for the Viet Cong. If anything, however, this had the opposite effect. Guerrilla attacks on US airfields increased, forcing Johnson to deploy Marines to defend the bases. The first detachment of 3,500 arrived at Da Nang in March 1965.

These troops now found themselves under attack, and were soon given permission to conduct offensive operations against the Viet Cong. Of course, their numbers were insufficient for the new role they were assigned, and the ARVN was unable to offer meaningful support. The generals now informed Johnson that American ground troops would be needed, if defeat were to be forestalled.

Johnson could not countenance defeat, given the investment America had made in South Vietnam over the preceding ten years, so he dispatched another 82,000 troops in July 1965. Almost immediately the US military demanded more. By the end of the year, the number had grown to 120,000.

Johnson now found himself on a slippery slope, with the military demanding more and more men and materiel. Two decades of anti-communist propaganda had created a situation where the American public would not accept retreat in South Vietnam. Johnson’s only option was to give the military what it wanted – an army which eventually numbered half a million men. Richard Nixon faced the same dilemma, prompting him to drag Cambodia into the war. It was only when public sentiment in America changed and the fear of communism subsided that presidents could begin the process of disengagement.


Hence, anti-communism played a key role in shaping American policy in Indochina between 1954 and 1975.


The database is protected by copyright ©essaydocs.org 2016
send message

    Main page